Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Jeez Dojji, you're killing me with this dump Nava stuff. You were his biggest booster and he had a great season and you want to dump him. WTF? His OPS of .831 was 3rd highest for Sox regulars after Ortiz and Napoli.
  2. I'd like to know where the 75-80 million posting fee estimate comes from. That just seems wrong. It'd be 50% more than the fee for Darvish, and by all accounts Tanaka is not as good as Darvish.
  3. As much as I liked Drew this year, 36/3 is too much.
  4. While Dempster ('the money') was on mopup duty.
  5. 75-80 million would be insane. Fee for Darvish, like Dice-K, was a little over 51 million.
  6. There's a new penalty for going over the threshold. If a big market team like the Red Sox stays under the threshold they have to pay less in revenue sharing than they do if they go over. No idea how it's calculated but it's a significant chunk of money.
  7. Yes, that was a huge problem this past season. They spent all that money on mid-range guys. And where did it get them?
  8. They did fall short with the same guys last year.
  9. You might need him in a park with a short right field fence to pull that off.
  10. Nobody should sleep on Workman, and (sorry about this) Buchholz should sleep on nobody.
  11. I know one thing - one of the world's thinnest books would be: 'Buy-low starters who have been big successes for the Red Sox.'
  12. Now I'd like to see a list of the buy-low guys from the last few years that have actually paid off.
  13. Yes. The Red Sox have Bodacious Ben.
  14. I'm looking forward to watching him for years. Although his numbers weren't great this year he was one of the guys I always wanted to watch when he was at the plate.
  15. What would you like to see them do about catcher next year?
  16. And the manager was certainly a lot more balanced than the last one.
  17. Not vastly underestimating, I don't think. Compare to Russell Martin's 2 years/$17 million. Martin is better defensively and not hugely worse offensively. Especially when Salty's OPS this year partially resulted from a high BABip.
  18. I don't think the revenue sharing rebate is quite that much but I could be wrong. However much it is, keep in mind that the rebate is an annual thing so it will always be there as a disincentive to going over the $189 million.
  19. I think they did last year, especially letting Swisher and Martin go and not replacing them with much. That was not the Yankee Way. They might get fed up with the thrifty s*** in a big hurry though.
  20. Look at it this way mark - if the posting fee was a non-issue, the Sox would have been all over Darvish. Darvish's contract is 6 years, 56 million - that's chump change by today's standards. Ryan Dempster - 13.25 million a year. Yu Darvish - 9.33 million a year. What's missing from that picture?
  21. I'm assuming it's also ownership's goal to make a certain amount of profit. I think they would be very much concerned about a $60 million fee they have to pay.
  22. Tanaka won't cost $10 million. Even on the low side, if it's $60 million posting fee plus $60 million for 6 years the total cost is $120 million. That's an average cost of $20 million per year. The only break is that the posting fee isn't counted for luxury tax.
  23. Plus the posting fee. So if the posting fee is $60 million and the contract is 6 years $90 million the total cost is 6 years $150 million.
  24. And his writing clarity is every bit as bad as his reading clarity. I need an interpreter to explain what he was saying there. At first I thought he was saying Ben needed to keep the team together because of it's great chemistry...then he seems to be saying get rid of Ellsbury & Drew etc...it all gets a bit baffling.
×
×
  • Create New...