Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. You have to change your avatar back. I can't look at that.
  2. Here's a comment from FanGraphs that everyone is going to love: From the 'After Dark Chat' on Tuesday: 9:12 Barry from Boston: The SP rotation after Price, slobs Panda and Handley, unproven Castillo and catchers. How can they be so highly regarded with this many holes? 9:13 Paul Swydan: Because there are potential solutions there. The Sox have a very wide beta. They could easily be a 98-win or 72-win team. Which I think is about 8-10 wins wider than the gap is for most teams. So there you have it folks - anywhere from 72 to 98, per FanGraphs! (I think the guy who asked the question may have been Jacko posing as a Sox fan.)
  3. I don't think it's a stretch to say that the Sox have about $78 million riding on Panda's 2016 season. Because if he isn't an appreciably better player this year than he was last year, he's a writeoff.
  4. Again I say, that is very ironic.
  5. I'll bet you really wrecked 'em the first time you told that joke.
  6. My optimism about Panda turning it around was quickly snuffed by the pictures. This guy might be a complete writeoff of 95 million.
  7. Agreed. I was just pointing out to mvp78 that he wasn't '3 wins in half a season' bad.
  8. Well, he was awful, but he wasn't quite that awful. His actual UZR for the games he played in was -17.8. The -31.9 is the number extrapolated to 150 games.
  9. Holy hell...talk about bad optics.
  10. The only problem with fat jokes is that hardly any of them are funny.
  11. Don't be led astray by mvp78's strange obsession with trading Pedroia.
  12. You guys are vicious!
  13. Good one Pete.
  14. I'd say he needs to put up a minimum OPS of say .690 to be a plus player on an everyday basis.
  15. I think you're right. But they really made themselves look ridiculous, starting with an offer of 70 million and ending with an offer of 135 million.
  16. Yes, he should leave that up to the experts - us.
  17. Balderdash. I'm a skeptic, but we were a .500 team last year and we've certainly improved.
  18. Agreed. But I was disagreeing with SoxHop about them not spending any money on pitching last year.
  19. Of course he has!
  20. Except for being one of the defensive outfielders in the game.
  21. JBJ was everyday material for his stint in 2015. He had a 2.4 fWAR in 66 starts, 74 games.
  22. The thing is, though, they basically swapped Lester for Porcello, who they're paying 95 million for 5 years. If they could have signed Lester for Homer Bailey+ money of 6 years, 110 to 120 million, they didn't save very much money at all.
  23. So their bungling led to the departure of 2 pitchers who put up a combined fWAR of 8.6 in 2015. That only leaves the question of how much of the blame for the bungling belongs to Ben, which we'll never know.
  24. I think you copied all this from a library of your own past posts.
  25. I don't think it's necessarily a mental connection. sk7326 is Mr. Reasonable of this forum, like thirtysomething was on the old forum.
×
×
  • Create New...