I think there's another team or two out there that would take him if they didn't have to give up much in return. As Sox fans we've been watching the guy so long that all we see now is his downside.
For what it's worth, over the three seasons from 2013 to 2015 Miley posted 5.9 fWAR and 4.6 bWAR while Buchholz posted 7.5 fWAR and 5.4 bWAR.
I agree with your other points. Miley had significant advantages other than the quality of his pitching.
Yeah, there's not much doubt that being manager of the Red Sox is one of the toughest jobs in sports when it comes to scrutiny and abuse. You can win 2 World Series and pick up the nickname Coma along the way.
You have a vivid imagination. Whether you go by FanGraphs or B-R, Buchholz put up a higher WAR in less innings last year. That's a simple and indisputable fact.
I see what she's saying, which is that they signed Buchholz, then tried to swing a trade of prospects for a #2 type starter but found the price too high, so they kept Buch. If they had swung the trade they would have traded him.
By the same token, in spite of the big dollar mistakes, Cherington's best pitching moves may have been getting Wright and ERod for Lars Anderson and a 2-month rental of Andrew Miller.
OK it's time for me to take a clear stand on Buchholz. No more fooling around.
I am in the group that believes categorically and unequivocally that if Clay starts pitching better, picking up the option will start looking better. And I'm not backing down on that.
You're illustrating the value of the WAR concept which gives you a much clearer way to compare 2 guys. For 13 million Buchholz should produce a WAR of about 2 to earn his pay. Price should produce a WAR of about 4.5.