Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. How about just a straightforward autographed 2018 World Series logo baseball? The pricing order is interesting. Betts $400 Price $200 Kimbrel $200 Benintendi $200 Bradley Jr $180 Pearce $170 Bogaerts $150 Eovaldi $150 Devers $100 If you want your Mookie ball with a 2018 WS Champs inscription, that'll up the price to $500 If you want your Pearce ball with a 2018 WS MVP inscription, that'll up the price to $200 The Devers ball looks like a relative bargain, doesn't it? Maybe even the Price ball. Hmmm...
  2. Let's start at the top. Shadowbox display case with 8 2018 World Series logo baseballs (not sure exactly who the 8 autographs are, but it looks like they're all primo ones) $2,500 Red Sox 2018 World Series Champions Louisville Slugger logo bat in display case 'with at least 10 signatures' $2,400 16 * 20 Red Sox 2018 World Series Champions 'dogpile' celebration photo 'with at least 10 signatures' $1,880 2018 World Series logo baseball in display case 'with at least 10 signatures' $1,800 Shadowbox display case with 3 2018 World Series logo baseballs autographed by Betts, Bradley & Benintendi $1,000 Framed 16 * 20 celebration photo of Betts, Bradley & Benintendi autographed by each $800
  3. The numbers are actually pretty striking: 1996-2018 ATL 14 playoff eliminations + 1 Wild Card loss OAK 7 playoff eliminations + 2 Wild Card losses MIN 6 playoff eliminations + 1 Wild Card loss Total 27 + 4 = 31
  4. I really do find this hard to believe. The Red Sox have won it all 4 times in 15 years. Oakland, Minnesota and Atlanta combined have won it zero times since 1995 despite making the playoffs a whole bunch of times. I think we had significantly better chances of winning than them because we were more stacked in all the different departments. Which resulted from our large payroll advantages and some smart GM's. Just my opinion.
  5. They didn't do that, but the closest thing to it-they put a limit on the width of the goalies' leg pads.
  6. To be fair, the vilification took place when the series was 2-1. And it did seem like a crushing loss at the time. Thankfully the team turned right around and pulled off an amazing comeback the next game.
  7. Something tells me that after a short grace period you're going back to saying mean things about Dave again.
  8. Yes, absolutely. Comparing Red Sox teams on their postseason records is just SO much more fun than it once was.
  9. As you mentioned earlier, I think, a team with a 60% probability of winning a game or series has only a 21.6% probability of doing this 3 times in a row. The flip side is that a team with a 40% probability of winning a game or series has only a 6.4% probability of doing this 3 times in a row.
  10. There's another item that I forgot to list: the growing paranoia about sign-stealing, forcing teams to have multiple sets of signs and changing them frequently. One unsightly by-product of this is all the instances of wild pitches and passed balls resulting from catchers getting crossed up on the signs.
  11. We had that moment this year when Mookie Betts pulled out and flashed his 'cheat card' after making a catch. A lot of folks found this funny/entertaining. Personally it made me a little queasy. No reflection on Mookie, of course. Just the fact that fielders now need these cards to know where to position themselves on every play.
  12. They were a longshot, though. Not impossible-longshots do come in sometimes. I guess the only real question here is, how much better of a chance does the favorite actually have vs. the longshot.
  13. Colorado had no chance, seriously. They were not a very good team.
  14. This year, I think Atlanta and Colorado had very little chance of going all the way. I think the Vegas guys were right.
  15. This year the biggest longshots on the Vegas board were Atlanta and Colorado. They were leaning heavily toward the AL to win it. The top 3 favorites were 1) Astros 2) Red Sox 3) Dodgers.
  16. Some teams come into the postseason as longshots on the Vegas board. If you really think those teams have the same chance, you should be betting those longshots every year.
  17. I hear what you're saying. But before they made the changes, the incidence of ties was getting to be ridiculous, because the games were also lower scoring.
  18. Some divisions are consistently weaker than others, are they not?
  19. Yeah, I get that. But some teams are clearly better than their record. Some are not. The franchises of Oakland, Minnesota and Atlanta have remarkably bad postseason records over the last 20 years or so. I don't think it's all randomness.
  20. You are on a roll, man.
  21. I disagree with this a bit. I think there are some teams that come into the playoffs with virtually no chance to win.
  22. MLBTR seems to think baseball is still on the upswing financially, judging by their predictions for Harper and Machado: Harper 14 years 420 million Machado 13 years 390 million
  23. It wouldn't be so boring if they sign Eovaldi...and Buchholz.
  24. Cole? Let's hope.
  25. Miller would be worth considering if his issues knock down his price to something reasonable. :D Like that's gonna happen.
×
×
  • Create New...