I'm 100% sure. You can be charged with a blown save if you come in in the 6th inning with a lead. If you give up the lead it's a blown save. If you protect it, it's a hold.
Look up the game logs on Baseball-Reference and you'll see the holds.
This is a case of bad stats, Denny.
Relief pitchers are charged with 'blown saves' even if they were in a 'hold' situation.
To figure out the correct numbers you have to add in the 'holds' earned as well.
With BA, let's look at a real life example for fun.
Mitch Moreland's BA is .227. Does that mean he's having a lousy season at the plate?
Well, he leads the team in SLG, HR and RBI, so there's that.
WAR is not that complicated if you accept that its intent is to measure how many RUNS a player produces or prevents above what a replacement player would.
WAR is derived from RAR - runs above replacement.
Obviously there are a lot of moving parts involved in trying to calculate runs produced and prevented.
I'm not interested in all the minutiae of how the calculations are done. I'm satisfied that the metrics folks are doing the best possible job they can. I also accept that there are going to be flaws and anomalies.
Nunez at DH is pretty ridiculous, agreed.
I can only guess it's the injury concern with not wanting JD to play left in Fenway. It's not a large area to cover but it's a little on the tricky & dangerous side.
Left may be the easiest of the three in Fenway, but it's probably asking a bit too much from JD to play right field in other parks and left field in Fenway.
The worst thing about batting average is that it spawned that stupid expression about even the best hitters failing 7 out of 10 times.
Williams and Ruth both got on base 48% of the time.
Like batting average, SLG is a very simple and transparent stat.
As another wise poster (sk7326) said, the problems with most stats are at the inference level.
OK, it's time to ask...
Who in the hell is Gio Urshela and how in the hell is he so freaking good all of a sudden? There is NOTHING in his history to suggest he can hit like this.
Barnes has been terrific.
Walden has been the big pleasant surprise DD was hoping for.
Workman has been as good or better than anyone could have hoped.
But Brasier is clearly struggling.
And after that, good luck.
I don't think anyone wants to sign him for more than 3 years.
With regard to the durability aspect, he might be one of those physical freaks who just doesn't break down like most guys do.
Yeah, these paternity leaves are pretty damn questionable. And you'd think ballplayers and their partners could time things to have their kids in the offseason.