Jump to content
Will the Red Sox get back to winning after yesterday's housecleaning? Join the conversation! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
  2. User Name
    Woah there young man, this is not a certainty, even for Oswalt.
  3. User Name
    The problem with the payroll projections is that nobody actually knows. The could be over, they could be under, they could be at it. We don't know.
  4. User Name
    Jenks is post-surgical. He's unmovable.
  5. User Name
    See, here's the point. None of us knows what was the scenario that prompted them to offer Ortiz arb.
  6. User Name
    This point can also be applied to the Wakefield/Varitek situation.
  7. User Name
    I still think they're actually below the cap, because they can exercise/have exercised the Lackey option. Otherwise, moving Scutaro quite simply makes no sense.
  8. User Name
  9. User Name
  10. User Name
    If they really had to trade Scutaro to free up salary, then that makes no sense.
  11. User Name
    Well you certainly think you're a know-it-all. "Anyone who could read the tea leaves". So everyone else is ignorant? And i'm nasty..... Anyways, there was a market for Ortiz (Baltimore and Seattle) and the Red Sox did offer him 2/18 before offering arb, which is what a700 says he would have taken.....and he didn't. So the assumption is incorrect.
  12. User Name
    The player benefits are too high, and iirc the Lackey option has been exercised (i could be wrong) if Ortiz loses his arb case, that would leave the Sox much further under the luxury tax than he predicts.
  13. User Name
    They don't "disagree with me" genius. What i meant by that is that they are usually wrong with their analysis and predictions. Which they are. Lrn2read. I said that i'm not saying anyone on the forum is an idiot.
  14. User Name
    No. You have a problem with reading comprehension. Both Cherington and Valentine denied such invitation was ever formally made, and only one source reported it, meaning it was probably a reporter who jumped the gun. What the f*** does this even mean? Posada retired after weighing his options to go to another team, not because he was "classy".
  15. User Name
    What's funny is that several people are clamoring for the Sox to operate more "Friedman style", and this is exactly what Andrew Friedman does with the Rays.
  16. User Name
    It seems like yesterday when you and i were being ridiculed for suggesting that very idea Example. Funny how these things work.....
  17. User Name
  18. User Name
    A) The whole "Everyone but Cherington knew he would accept" line is ridiculous. B ) It has been publicly denied several times that the Red Sox offered Varitek or Wakefield any type of contract. Including your beloved Bobby V. Really bro. Stop it.
  19. User Name
    Hey Jacksonian, Skyrim thread plz.
  20. User Name
    Yeah it's a pipe dream.
  21. User Name
    If they moved Pedroia to SS (which they shouldn't do) then they should play the offensively superior Aviles at 2B.
  22. User Name
    I dunno about that. Wrist injuries are always very complicated. I'd say late April as the best-case scenario.
  23. User Name
    His skills have noticeably eroded. I don't think that's a chance you want to take.
  24. User Name
    The problem is, that right now, they can't hide his bat in the lineup. They can do it when the lineup is at full strength, but it would be a problem to start the season.
  25. User Name
    .643 combined OPS the last two seasons. Can't get on base, non-existent power, ineffective base stealer, and below-average D. Why would we want him?
×
×
  • Create New...