Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Booooooooo
  2. User Name
    What the hell are you doing Felix?
  3. User Name
    Doubront gave Davis a meatball.
  4. User Name
    Epic Fail for the OBP "Monster"
  5. User Name
    Nava DO NOT GIDP!
  6. User Name
    Well son of a bitch. Iglesias has some balls on 'im.
  7. User Name
    And JBJ is very very good at baseball.
  8. User Name
    Victorino is apparently not that bad at baseball.
  9. User Name
    Pitcher's best friend.
  10. User Name
    For $5 mill? Yes.
  11. User Name
    Jesus Christ Napoli.
  12. User Name
    NAPOLI DO NOT GIDP!
  13. User Name
    My God Ellsbury flies.....
  14. User Name
    That wasn't Valentines' problem. His problema was losing the clubhouse with both the Mets and Sox.
  15. User Name
    Hey-oooooooooooooh
  16. User Name
    Haha that's because they call Moustakas "Moooooooose" in KC, which sounds very much like "Boooooooooo".
  17. User Name
    The first Red Sox HR will be hit by Jose Iglesias, and we will all bow before his greatness. That is all.
  18. User Name
    No it wouldn't. It would demonstrate the ability for excellence, coupled with bursts of "very good play" and a ton of injury problems.
  19. User Name
    Actually the market for OF with Ellsbury's profile was set by the Red Sox with the Crawford contract. Fast-forward to this year, and look at the Bourn contract (who is essentially Ellsbury with less power but more pure OB ability) and notice that trend being reversed. If Ellsbury doesn't exhibit big power, he's not making big money. it's a simple as that.
  20. User Name
    Except that the Dodger OF is more than full with Kemp/Ethier/Crawford and Puig waiting in the wings and Pederson/Baldwin quickly developing. The "Dodgers will sign him" argument is overplayed. They cannot sign every major free agent, since roster space is, after all, limited.
  21. User Name
    So is their offense.
  22. User Name
    They are different issues though. The positional change is one thing, the Red Sox paying him is another. I get the impression that the possibility of Ellsbury staying is a lot more real than most of us think. I don't think he'll ever post 20 HR's again, and if he posts a .300/.360/.450 line with 15 HR's and 40+ SB, he probably won't be able to parlay those numbers into a contract significantly bigger than the one Michael Bourn got, allowing the Sox to be players for him. 2011 is long gone. What matters is what he does in 2013. Whoever says the Sox (or anyone for that matter) should/would pay 20 per for Ellsbury needs to have their head examined.
  23. User Name
    How does the phrase "grabbing at straws" apply in that instance? He was suggesting a plausible scenario which was actually tried by the Red Sox before. All of that positional discussion is mostly nonsense. The only problem here is whether or not the Sox are willing to shell out the dough.
  24. User Name
    Dear Lord Aceves sucks ass
  25. User Name
    Palodios and i had an argument about Nava and hyperbole about his on-base skills.
×
×
  • Create New...