Ted, I will be paying my dues pretty late in the year because my credit card with US currency on it was cloned. I had to cancel it and it will take a minimum of 45 days to replace it counting from last Friday.
Yet I've seen multiple instances of hitters diving at close intentional balls and getting base hits. Miguel Cabrera driving in a game-winner on an intentional ball comes to mind.
Why is this argument still a thing? Don't you people know the immortal Carlos Quentin is now a Red Stocking? This team no longer has a single weakness!
You clearly don't understand what a sample actually is. A whole career, half a career, a month, two games, anything can be a sample depending on context, which was my point.
I've talked to players who have been on consistent winners (though not at the mlb level, but rather winter league levels, with some having cups of coffee in the majors) who believe clutch is not a repeatable skill (because it's not) but that some guys let the pressure get to them and shrink. Your statement is incorrect on so many levels.
That's the point. Why would you do the same thing? It's illogical. You need a point that your use of a sample should back up.
Everyone knows EE's story. He was a terrible defensive 3B and a meh hitter who broke out after reaching the Blue Jays and being moved off the position. Shouldn't the "current" EE be the basis of comparison against Hanley? Also, stop being such a massive homer. Encarnacion is clearly an overall better player than Hanley right now. I love Hanley, but it is what it is.
Nope, some guys just perform worse on pressure situations. If a guy consistently has problems hitting or getting people out out in pressure situations, he's a choker. Let me do a little research (I have done this before mind you) and I'll give you a list of hitters and pitchers who have consistently underperformed in pressure situations throughout their careers (Hint: A-Rod is not one of them).