Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    84,167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    231

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. Terrible reading comprehension again. Maybe we should all post in bold? Go back and read the NFL thread again. You will be proven wrong. FACT!
  2. Still don't see me getting anything wrong here. Poster states that he said Sandoval was in the mix in the fall and a lot of posters disagree. FACT! Poster is shown that he never mentioned that Sandoval should be in the mix during the fall. FACT! Poster is in fact shown that an alternate poster was a leading proponent of Sandoval getting playing time. FACT!
  3. There's a difference? Not to me.
  4. If you're dumb enough to believe the "Cheatriots" nonsense, I'm not going to give you the benefit of the doubt elsewhere.
  5. Nope. He used the "Cheatriots" line in the NFL thread and it was god awful. I was just making fun of him for using it in the first place.
  6. Abe Alvarez rocked a nice crooked hat, but that's about it. Bowden was just overhyped and never did anything. Kelly was sent away long before he was a blip on the MLB radar.
  7. It's ok. I understand you don't like to admit when you're wrong. Facts don't matter to Mr Cheatriots.
  8. http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/penaju01.shtml
  9. But saying that you want him traded or "Castillo'd" is not leaving him in the mix?
  10. Stating that you want to either trade or "Castillo" Panda is pretty black and white about your feelings for him on the roster. It's not me reading into anything.
  11. My point is that back in the fall you wanted him nowhere near 3B, so don't pat yourself on the back because "you wanted him at 3B back then and people gave you s*** for it but now want him at 3B too." It's just not true. You didn't want him at 3B.
  12. Posts 21 and 38 of this very thread, FYI.
  13. On the very same day you wanted to "Castillo" Panda or trade him away, I posted the following:
  14. In reference to what to do about Panda on 10/11/16 from this very thread.
  15. You said in reference to the fall: When I just listed Pablo as a possible competitor at 3B for the 2017 season, hardly anyone agreed and many laughed or berated the idea. However, in the fall you spent more time pining for a trade for Frazier and only stated that Pablo should be in the mix at DH, but would rather trade him anywhere else. http://www.talksox.com/forum/threads/17963-Looking-ahead-to-2017
  16. Man, you just love patting yourself on the back over and over again even when you're incorrect about the facts.
  17. He had moments where he was in shape in SF. The production didn't always correlate with his weight though.
  18. I don't think anyone could doubt that. I think Theo just saw him as a one year guy and had no interest in signing him again.
  19. Wrong!
  20. Honestly, for Pablo there was nowhere to go but up.
  21. He's going to exceed those numbers and play 130+ games.
  22. Ells and Paps left after Theo did.
  23. Derek Lowe? I don't think anyone thought he'd come back to bite us. Can't really think of another guy.
  24. And when to feed the monster with a nice fat CC signing!
  25. If you need more than 8 SP's as depth, you're f***ed. Elias has a better chance at a spot start than Owens or Johnson. It's not that hard to find a AAAA pitcher.
×
×
  • Create New...