Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    82,877

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. mvp 78
    For reference, this is probably the first time Jacko and Slasher have agreed.
  2. mvp 78
    LAA's payroll is $50M less than BOS. There's wiggle room to squeeze one pitcher and eat half of the other pitcher's salary.
  3. mvp 78
    It just reminds me of the Lester situation, that's all.
  4. mvp 78
    For Casas? No.
  5. mvp 78
    Unfortunately, I have always believed that if he walks out the door, that he doesn't come back. That's why I'm a big proponent of just re-signing him now.
  6. mvp 78
    You have the same training regiment and DNA as Mookie?
  7. mvp 78
    Everything is risky. It's not 100% to be a slamdunk. I just believe the likelihood of it working out is better than for other big contracts.
  8. mvp 78
    Creepy.
  9. mvp 78
    But I never expected him to stay at MVP levels from age 34 - 40. This "bigly" drop is really hard to determine. How much of a drop are you expecting? Is he going to crater, or just be a solid MLB starter? It's impossible to say for sure.
  10. mvp 78
    I'm really trying not to roll my eyes at this one.
  11. mvp 78
    Maybe the bigger issue is Pujols' contract and not Trout? Maybe having one big monster deal is easy enough to work around, but having 2 is another matter?
  12. mvp 78
    Because Mitch has been around for a few years, is a known quantity and a guy everyone likes? There weren't too many other LHB platoon options available and the price seems pretty attractive to me.
  13. mvp 78
    It's something for sure!
  14. mvp 78
    If Pujols was given a 12 year deal at the same age Mookie is requesting it, he would already be retired by now. Pujols also provides next to nothing with the glove. Betts will give a decent amount of value defensively even if his offense in his late 30's turns to Pujols levels.
  15. mvp 78
    Not sure that's Trout's fault. Here's Trout's salary by year: 2014 1M 2015 5M 2016 15M 2017 19M I can't believe Trout put the owners in the poor house like that! Over those 4 years, he provided $250M in value to the Angels. Yup, definitely Trout's fault!
  16. mvp 78
    Reset some other time then? The Sox need Mookie more than they need to get under the tax.
  17. mvp 78
    God willing!
  18. mvp 78
    IMO, Mookie is an exception too.
  19. mvp 78
    Was "All I want to see is one Red Sox WS title before I die." Is "Please don't sign the greatest modern day Red Sox player to a long contract that I won't outlive."
  20. mvp 78
    Not my problem. That's when my post count finally reaches the top!
  21. mvp 78
    Also, if he was beyond generous, why f*** around with Lester?
  22. mvp 78
    If they are willing to pay Eovaldi and Price the amounts they are paying, they should be willing to pay Mookie (a guy who offers so much more to the franchise) a metric f*** ton more than that. He's worth the money according to Fangraphs.
  23. mvp 78
    Well, nobody leaked that they offered $300/10 to him until now. Nobody has leaked about the coaching hire. Seems like this is the new normal. Rather than running to Henry's paper, they are just handling their business in house.
  24. mvp 78
    Limits? They've year in and year out been towards the top of payroll spending?
  25. mvp 78
    According to fangraphs, he's already been worth about $300M in the previous 6 years. It's not far fetched to think he can replicate that for the next 6. Then you just have to decide what he'll be worth for the remaining 4-6 years. His glove will always play. He takes care of himself. Even if you factor that his production shrinks to a 1/3 over the final half of the contract (age 34 - 40), he'd be worth about $100M for 6 years. That's basically $400M for 12 years in fangraphs value. You're earning a lot of value on the contract in the first half. You can't expect to hose the player for the last half. He's already been hosed enough. Through 2020, he'll only be paid $60M for his whole career. According to fangraphs, he should be worth almost $350M through 2020. Why does he have to eat that loss of approx $250M in excess value he's provided to the Sox? Why is it that only the owners can get ahead? Mookie is the face of the franchise. He's a future HOF. You pay him and build around him.
×
×
  • Create New...