Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Dipre

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Dipre

  1. Well goddamn. Didn't expect you to be the voice of reason.
  2. Well goddamn. You have me there.
  3. As soon as this team loses two games in a row, a bunch of people here become insufferable and make it hard to post on the site. It's not that complaining isn't warranted, but as I understand it, this a *baseball discussion* forum, not a *let's whine until the site is unreadable* forum.
  4. Not that this a team that could make the playoffs. They're in the hunt. Also, is the sole reason why some of you (and I'm including you) follow the Red Sox is to whine incessantly? That takes a toll on one's mental health.
  5. Well this weekend sucked
  6. Cool. Still not worth what they will ask for him, as a bat-only player.
  7. I loved it when he Fistered the Yankees though. Didn't happen often, but it was always funny.
  8. W-L is the worst way to evaluate a pitcher's ability.
  9. I have 10/10 rights then.
  10. Rangers are done IMO. And many of the sources I've read believe this is posturing by Young. But he may really believe in his club. We'll see.
  11. There's a lot of context to be analyzed in Gomber's numbers though. Not a fan myself. Something tells me old friend Eovaldi might wind up rejoining the Red Sox.
  12. The point isn't just avoiding 4-seamers. It's avoiding bad 4-seamers.
  13. *Meant drafting for need, and won't let me edit.
  14. Yeah not the point. You come up here with this "gotcha" crap, as clearly stated by your post, and it's clearly not true, and that's evident to anyone following the draft. They weren't clearly "hunting for pitching". They drafted big-bodied, projectable pitchers in a draft that was weak in position players, and even then, their first pick was an OF who was the best athlete available, and their most exciting pick a two-way player who was clearly the best athlete available at the time. You wanna know what trading for need instead of best player/athlete available look like?https://www.mlb.com/news/angels-pick-only-pitchers-in-2021-mlb-draft How¿d that work out?
  15. It's been a hitters' park for a while, yet they have a bunch of talented hitters who seemingly underperform.
  16. I'm tired of these motherf***ing Grissom haters, in this motherf***ing Talksox.
  17. Yeah, this. His launch angle is strangely low for a guy his size and with very much an uppercut swing.
  18. This was the worst position player crop in maybe the last decade. And they only signed two more pitchers than last draft. Like, if you don't really understand how something works, why spew this BS?
  19. Bellhorn richer than a mo'fo. He can afford them.
  20. I mean, did you mark them?
  21. I don't think Devers and Vlad are comparable, as you can argue Devers is the better athlete. That's why he still plays the field and Vlad does not. Guerrero hit the ball very hard, but needs improvement to his launch angle from what I've gathered. There's something there.
  22. I think it's a conditioning issue, not a coaching issue. As a fat guy I can tell you being fatter than usual f***s you up.
  23. If they sign Giolito and Elfin, we still have Houck as ace and an actual 5th starter.
×
×
  • Create New...