Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,327

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    I'd like to know what the math is behind those projections. I am sure that he didn't pull it from his ass. The projection of a 4.00 ERA makes it hard to justify the $20 MILLION/YEAR contract. I wonder how many starters with 4.00 ERAs have signed $20 million/year contract for 4 years. Edti: I am not asking you to get me the math. I am just saying that I am curious about what goes into these projections.
  2. a700hitter
    You didn't answer my question. It is fine to be forward thinking. Every business need to do that to be successful, but I was asking about metrics that would indicate that he would improve his game. As for the better Red Sox defense, that is probably off set by Fenway being more hitter friendly.
  3. a700hitter
    What metrics are the FO relying upon as indicators that Porcello's game will progress to a level where he will be worth $20 million/year?
  4. a700hitter
    Welcome. I am a Brooklyn, NY born lifetime Red Sox fan. And don't believe Kimmi. She' s as twisted as the rest of us. Otherwise, she would not fit in.
  5. a700hitter
    I am reading that teams looking to upgrade their starting staff and potential competition for Hamels are the Dodgers, Yankees, Cardinals, and Cubs. Stiff competition with deep pockets. I can hear the whiny excuses when we land Eric Bedard 2.0 and one or more of the other teams land the prize catches.
  6. a700hitter
    True.
  7. a700hitter
    I agree. I hate losing to those guys.
  8. a700hitter
    I knew he mention of Gator would get a response from you. I don't think Greeny was a good OFer, but he wasn't as bad a people made him out to be. I think he was better than HanRam is.
  9. a700hitter
    I think this is accurate, but it was not a big value play. If anything Ben paid a premium price here and established a new bar. It was surprising to me, because the Red Sox have not been in the habit of setting the market since Theo departed.
  10. a700hitter
    Hanley is not quoite as bad in LF as Daniel Murphy was when the Mets tried him out there in 2009. But he is mich worse than Manny and maybe even worse the Mike Greenwell.
  11. a700hitter
    I am encouraged by what I have seen and read about Johnson, but concerned about Owens. I'd look to see if the Phillies have any interest in him.
  12. a700hitter
    He has been stepping up the k's which is encouraging, but until last night it came with an alarming increase in HR balls. Time will tell. If he fails, this team is cooked in 2015. Even if he performs like a #2, I still think $20 million/year for a #2 establishes a new market value level for #2's. I can't think of many #2's making $20 million/yr.
  13. a700hitter
    That is what we need from him.
  14. a700hitter
    Yes. We both agree that the contract extension came too fast. And I think we both agree that he is not an ace. I am holding out hope that he can step up and pitch like a #2 with under a 4 ERA. I am not sure that he will, but a case of beer will make for an interesting bet and some fun.
  15. a700hitter
    Not you Spud, but don't do that. Respect the "ignore" feature unless you are stirring the pot for a troll.
  16. a700hitter
    ^ You are irrelevant to me, so why bother responding when i don't view you?
  17. a700hitter
    It was and is a legitimate thread. The state of our pitching is a huge concern not just to fans, but I heard last night's pre-game radio show and Farrell is very concerned as well. The porblem is not that thread but a few jackholes (and you know who they are) who insist on demeaning posters for their opinions about baseball and the Red Sox.
  18. a700hitter
    He'd rather accuse you of something, which by the way, I don't think anyone else took it the way he did.
  19. a700hitter
    Just proves that your hate filter for iortiz has short circuited your ability to read and comprehend. He was clearly asking her to bet $. His reference to "boys" was not sexist or exclusionary. It was clearly a reference distinguishing between child and adult. Otherwise the invitation in the same post to bet money makes no sense. He rebuffed the offer to bet a sig saying it was for "boys". Certainly, it should be clear to you by now that ioriz is someone who prefers to bet cash, and he invited her to bet cash. He didn't say sig bets were for girls. English is your first language but when colored by your hate filter, you get things pretty messed up. But by all means, tell iortiz what he meant to say when he posted that, because you know better than he what was in his mind.
  20. a700hitter
    Thank you. Good luck!
  21. a700hitter
    Plus, our fans and friends here will not know who to root for or against. Their hate will consume them and we will just be haqving fun. Don't bother reseraching U.S. IPAs yet. I'm usually pretty good on these bets.
  22. a700hitter
    Israel, did you open your books for 1 more Porcello bet?
  23. a700hitter
    You didn't. You said that sig bets were for boys not for men, but today in the US all references must be gender neutral or you get accused of stuff. So, you see the "victim mentality" requires that you say sig bets are for children not for adults, and then you would only be accused of hating children. LOL!!!
  24. a700hitter
    Oye.
  25. a700hitter
    Signig a guy to a long term contract that continues into his 40s just makes no sense.
×
×
  • Create New...