Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. After going a record 0 for 39
  2. Kelly took a dump on the mound tonight.
  3. with MLB extra innings I watch lots of different broadcasts. He is an excellent analyst. He doesn't have pet peeves that he beats to death, and he doesn't try to explain and analyze minutiae. He finds the right balance and always gives relevant insight into what is going on.
  4. Every time that I look at Pomeranz, I see the cliff and I pine for the potential of Espinoza Anderson.
  5. Excellent stuff.
  6. Mookie's first HR since August 3rd I think.
  7. Dewey Evans type catch by Mookie in the first inning.
  8. Stop bringing up nonexistent things. Choking? Why don't you blame the tooth fairy.
  9. Yes, that is unfortunate. But he has to be more movable than Pablo was.
  10. With his balky knee, I don't think we can count on Pedroia for 150 games even under ideal circumstances. Bogey's inability to handle a slider, he may need to sit from time to time. Devers may not be able to handle 3B defensively full time. If we sign or trade for a big 1B bat, I would rather move Hanley and keep Nunez who brings more value and versatility.
  11. Especially after an off day.
  12. I thought Eck was on tap for tonight, but I am glad Remy will be in the booth.
  13. I thought he still had a play at 1B after the double clutch. He tried to force the play and that is never a good idea.
  14. That is great news about Remy.
  15. That had nothing to do with him as a player for the Sox.
  16. Everyday leadoff hitter. Is that good enough to call him a full time player? I think so.
  17. What didn't you like about Boggs as a player -- too many batting championships... too high of an OBP?
  18. Running with your head down without noticing that the lead runner is returning to the base that you are running toward.
  19. And even assuming that it could be proved (and it cannot) that we did not lose a single game due to base running blunders, that would be pure random luck. Or are you saying that a noted flaw of this team (poor base running awareness) will not or cannot cost us any games? If you can prove the former, I really don't care about identifying and quantifying the reasons for each of our losses. If you are taking the position that a recurrent flaw can never cost us a game, then you are just wrong, and on that there can be no countervailing argument.
  20. You think you are proving something, but you are not proving anything. It is worthless blather with no point, unless your point is that sound base running doesn't matter in baseball. If that is your point, you are just 100% wrong.
  21. His whole position is untenable. They don't coach kids and professionals about sound situational base running, because it doesn't matter. It is good baseball that helps you win games. If it didn't cost us a single game this year, then we were just randomly lucky. Until I see an analysis of every base running blunder and defensible provable analysis that it didn't affect the outcome of any game, his argument goes into the worthless blather category. You and others have astutely and correctly made the point that a single play can affect the entire dynamics of a game, so no such analysis he might make would be reliable.
  22. In that game if we had put up an additional run an CC had to pitch to an additional batter in a stressful AB in that inning, the whole game could have changed.
  23. Base running mistakes that take runs off the board change the dynamics of the game with regard to which pitchers each manager might be used etc. I agree with you that OOBs stat is not reliable. In fact, I would say that OObs is for boobs. And that is not a sexist term!
  24. No one is quantifying 5 or 10 games, but even if it can't be causally linked to losses to your satisfaction, it may have played a big part in some losses. We have had few games where base running gaffes have cost us a couple of runs. In some of those games, we were blown out, but that doesn't mean that the base running gaffes didn't contribute to the loss. If we are down 1 or 2 runs in the 7th inning, the manager will not go to his top shut down relievers and the other team may open up a bigger lead, and that would never have happened if we were tied or ahead going into the 7th inning. I guess this type situation of doesn't factor into your calculations. Your position is untenable as you say, because fundamentally sound base running is coached, because that is good baseball, and good baseball gives you the best chance of winning. If it doesn't cost us at the end of the season, great for us, but they shouldn't be making these base running gaffes on such a regular basis.
  25. Nunez is an everyday player -- not a supersub. He's versatile, but he should play everyday.
×
×
  • Create New...