It's a different game today. Ballparks are smaller today. The pitching mound is lower. The 1960's were ridiculously pitching dominated, because of the higher mound. As for fielding, if you can get a copy of the second to last game of the 1967 season (which is the oldest known full game broadcast in color) you will see the drastic difference in field condition from today. The groundskeepers for today's teams have all sorts of Masters degrees in grass and dirt. Back then heads groundskeepers were retired fireman, cops etc. The grounds crew were part-time guys. Today's infields are made of composite materials that cost millions and they are carefully manicured. Back then the IF's were dirt. There were lot's of bad hops. If you watch that game you will see how the Infield got chewed up after a few innings from the players cleats. The outfielders were splashing around because of all the standing water from the prior day. Scott was the premier fielding 1B of his day. The stats don't translate to today. They just don't.... offensively or defensively. Youk is not the best fielding 1B in the game today. He is very, very good, but he is not the best. Tex is much better with the leather. No one was better than Scott in that era. It's got nothing to do with putting anyone on pedestals. Greatness is determined in the context of a player's contemporaries. You didn't see him play, and if you want to use stats to judge him, judge him against the stats of his peers.