Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. I am not downplaying it, but a guy who has reached Lester's level of sustained success at the MLB level got there by working out all the kinks over several seasons. He maintained his success by repeating his delivery thousands of times. He has built up muscle memory that is robotic like every other successful ballplayer. I don't think that he could have strayed from his mechanics so radically that he would have to rebuild the whole thing. Usually, after achieving his level of sustained success, it is a minor fine tuning situation as opposed to a major overhaul. He should have worked it out over the course of a season. I think there is very possibly something else at work whether it be mental or damage to his arm. People think that he will regain his old stuff if he abandons the cutter. I don't think it works that way. Dick Radatz used to tell an interesting story about adding a pitch to his arsenal. He was at the height of his success when one Spring Teddy Ballgame suggested that he had the perfect motion for a sinker. Teddy Ballgame was like a walking god at Spring camp. If he talked to you, you listened. Radatz worked on the sinker all spring and it was coming along really well, but when they broke camp and Radatz reached for his bread and butter, the big heat wasn't the same. He had lost a foot off his fastball and he never regained it. He had no discernable arm injury. I don't believe that he ever had arm trouble, but his dominating gas was gone. He went from being an intimidating overpowering force to a punching bag seemingly over night. I am sure someone will research this and my recollection could be faulty on Radatz. Maybe William s suggested a slider and not a sinker, and he may have hit the DL at some point, but the main point stands. Lester's 4 seamer is not what it had been. Others have inferred that the cutter could have a negative impact on other pitchers. I am just saying that abandoning the cutter may not bring back the fastball.
  2. Lester is going to have to figure this out on his own. If it is simply a mechanical problem, he will have to figure it out on his own. I am not convinced that this is simply a mechanical issue, because his problems lasted too long.
  3. Home or away didn't matter. Last year, the old Lester didn't show up anywhere. I also don't buy the Fenway Park bugaboo explanation.
  4. So, but for a few starts in one stretch, you think he was the Lester of old? I can't agree with that. Whenever I hear such cherry-picking of a players performance, I answer with a question: What do you call a pitcher that has one bad inning every game giving up 5 runs in that inning? The answer is that he is a bad pitcher even if he puts up goose eggs in every other innings. The same goes for a season. Lester is what his final stats showed. He stunk. What is most concerning is that he didn't appear to return to anything close to a dominating form by the end of the season.
  5. SFF, you are one of my favorite posters and you are solid on player evaluations, but this ^ is an untenable statement. I am not saying this to pick nits or to argue, but we all need to feel the cold slap of reality of 2012. It was the year that opened our eyes to the fact that this is a bad organization on all levels of its baseball operations. Their marketing department is top shelf, and they have a great established fan base that stretches around the globe. The baseball operations needs an overhaul. Hopefully, we will see that they have made some progress in that regard in the next few years. I really think they need to get some people in the organization who know and can evaluate pitching at all levels.
  6. Is the alternative that it is a physical issue as opposed to a mental issue? Is a physical issue less problematic?
  7. The "Farrell Effect" on Lester or Buchholz is wishful thinking. I don't think pitching coaches have much effect on performance at all.
  8. They made the right call with Bay, but it had nothing to do with their injury assessment which was for his knee and shoulder. Neither have caused him a problem. He runs as hard and fast as when he was with the Sox. His game fell apart after the cumulative effect of two concussions.
  9. Are you interested in the signature bet?
  10. In he ALE poll, out of 19 votes so far, only 1 person voted that the Red Sox would win the division. Either the positive posters don't think the team has much of a chance or they didn't vote. There's no reason not to vote, because the votes are anonymous.
  11. Stop with the hedging about injuries. Durability is baked into your prediction, so we will hold you to it if he gets injured. How about a signature bet? I post my projections and whoever comes closer on more categories win.
  12. Be a little more specific. Do your best Bill James. What kind of numbers are you projecting?
  13. And his WHIP is atrocious. He really isn't that much better than Happ at this point. He could be better, but he is yet to prove it. De La Rosa is good depth? Based on what track record. Throwing hard is not enough.
  14. I though Drabeck had the TJS in June last year, so he would be a depth option after the ASB. No one said Happ was good, but he is probably better than our depth options. Doubront is not much better and he is in our rotation.
  15. Crawford. If we had the Giants pitching where they could put Lincecum in the bull pen, I would much care if our SS could hit. But we have terrible pitching, so we will need to bludgeon people.
  16. Plus, they have Drabeck and Happ for depth.
  17. It's a solid move.
  18. You will not get an argument from me. In fact, I think the first base and OF could be just 1 move.
  19. Now you are talking crazy. If the Red Sox did that, they could be contenders. Everybody has given up hope of contending until at least 2015. I'm not quite sure why that is.:dunno:
  20. I don't think Drew would have signed without the assurance that he will be the starting SS.
  21. This is an interesting way of looking at it.
  22. If they only want De Ls Rosa, stuff him in a Fed Ex box so he gets there before Christmas.
  23. If they only want De Ls Rosa, stuff him in a Fed Ex box so he gets there before Christmas.
  24. I guess Luchinno and Cherington will be in your seats for the next Pats home game. LOL! It looks like they have little confidence in Iglesias' offensive ability.
×
×
  • Create New...