a700hitter

There are a couple of hotties sitting by the Cleveland dugout. Maybe Tito is snapchatting with them during the game.

Just he back of her head.

He has realy regressed in AAA. He's barely hitting .200.

Ells is getting on base tonight.

Take my bet or shut up blowhard.

He hits my roster today. He'll probably go 0 for 4.

Are they going to finish this game under water?

Damn!

They are trying to give us this game.

It looks like Farrel is going to pull Doubront after 6 innings and 85 pitches. ???

Ells is useless right now. I just can understand why he has to find his groove while batting leadoff. Let him find his groove in the 9th hole.

I hope he blows out his arm.

They are almost all brainless. Some are stubborn too.

Two slugs at the top of the order, and just like I said, Ortiz will lead off the second inning.:thumbdown Brainless manager.

Why are we talking about Tito if Ellsbury batting leadoff is causing a problem? Who the f*** cares about Tito. good luck to him, the clueless bastard. He's my all-time favorite Red Sox manager by a long shot.

What does Larry L have to do with batting two slugs like Ellsbury and Gomes at the top of the order so that Papi has a good chance of leading off the second inning? I don't care who is making the lineup, but any lineup with 1 or 2 slugs batting at the top forcing Papi to the 4th slot is just a bad lineup.

Larry L made the lineups?

That's why we made the trade. We both think it will help our teams.

Not really. For a trade to get vetoed, it has to be either completely one-sided and/or it has to unfairly impact the competitive balance of the league. This trade is neither. If Segura finishes close to Trout in points my point will be vindicated that the trade was imbalanced. It won't matter if I lose the bet to Pal. He's a good guy, but I disagree with him on the issue. I proposed the wager to keep attention on this. As for UN, I'll give him some of the action on the bet, but the terms would be different for him. Trout had 643 points last year. What would constitute a lopsided trade 10% difference, 15% difference? A player with 10% less points would have 579 points. Only 10 hitters had more points than that in 2012. Trading players in the top 10 is not a lopsided. 15% less points would be 547 points. Only 18 hitters reached that level. Let that blowhard UN put his money where his mouth is. Let him take the Segura vs Trout bet and since he is convinced it is lopsided he should spot me 15%. He'll never go for it, because he is nothing but a blowhard.

Put your money where your mouth is Fantasy writer.

"The Man" ? You are such a fool.

People have expressed their opinions. I offered to rescind the trade. I offered alternative trades if the trade got vetoed or if he wanted to rescind the trade. My offers still stand. My friend knows that I will not bear ill will against him if we rescind and go forth with the alternative. So, how am I taking advantage of anyone? Under the alternative, I get to keep Segura and I would get Trout.

Side wager when we go head to head?

You are such an angry bitter person.

The trade with Pal for Papi will help my team more than the alleged lopsided trade, because it will give my team more balance. My top 3 hitters are CarGo, Papi and Trout. On the pitching side, I have Verlander, Harvey, Lee, and Greinke. Closers are Kimbrel and Chapman. I'll ride with that.