I don't agree with that they have no hitting.
Eric Chavez, in his somewhat limited time, has been just as good as Scott Rolen this year, not to mention that he's three years younger, is better at getting on base and is developing more power than Rolen. The AB/HR and BB/K say it all, Chavez is better in both of them. Give them full healthy seasons at 27 and 30 respectively next year and Eric Chavez will outproduce Scott Rolen, that's a guarantee.
At the top of the order, Kotsay and Byrnes have been very good at getting on base. While behind Chavez; Dye, Hatteberg, Durazo, Crosby and even Damian Miller have been very solid. All of them (except Dye) are on base at a minimum of a .350 clip and three of them (Dye, Durazo, Crosby) should finish the year with 25 homeruns.
I think their offensive attack is more consistent than the Angels. Once you get past Vlad and Guillen, nothing is really scary. Injuries have hampered Anderson (who's overrated anyway) and Darin Erstad is playing over his head right now. Other than that, none of their hitters are really any good. I'd take the A's offense over the Angels offense, no matter how many of you call me crazy.