Exactly. This is why the Sox have had a better offseason so far. The Yankees only needed to upgrade, much like we upgraded last year with Schilling and Foulke. The Red Sox HAD to go out and replace their #2 and #3 starters, replace their SS and try to sign their 3rd baseman and catcher. We lost Pedro, Cabrera, Williamson, Lowe, Roberts, Reese, Millar or Minky and Kapler - yet we are almost as good, if not deeper than last year. AND, we still have some holes to fill.
The Yankees surely upgraded from last year, but Theo basically rebuilt 1/3 of the team with players that can come close to/match/or even exceed last years FAs. Oh, and our payroll will be more flexable since we are spending I think 10 million less than last year and, AND, we didn't lose a single prospect in doing so.
Come the trade deadline, the Sox will be sitting pretty and the Yankees - should they need someone - will not be as flexible. This is why the Sox have had the better offseason if you ask me.
Just an interesting Sox tid bit here:
Last year's opening day rotation plus the number 6 starter win totals for 2004:
(yes, I know wins are overrated, but here they are anyway..)
75 wins.
This year's opening day rotation plus the number 6 starter - if they collectively total the same number of wins they had last year.
71 wins.
I think Miller and Clement, if healthy, can win more than the 16 total games they won last year, don't you? They could probably both win 16.