Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    The Time Has Come: Why the Red Sox Must Trade from Their Outfield Depth This Offseason

    The Red Sox have plenty of talent roaming the outfield. There is no reason to delay the inevitable any further.

    Alex Mayes
    Image courtesy of © Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

    Still in just the beginning stages of the offseason, the Boston Red Sox still have a giant logjam at the major league level in the outfield. There are four, and up to six, names that are starting-caliber outfielders on the 40-man roster. and they all have a chance to break spring training with the major league club in 2026. As we’ve covered multiple times here at Talk Sox, the free-agent market for virtually every position is incredibly thin and offers very little upside outside of the top four or five names that are available. While Craig Breslow expects the Red Sox to add through free agency, any huge impact will likely have to come through trades. Since the Red Sox have so much talent in the outfield, let’s take a look at the pros and cons of trading any of Jarren Duran, Wilyer Abreu, or Ceddanne Rafaela.

    For the sake of this exercise, we'll consider Roman Anthony safe... unless the Dodgers put Shohei Ohtani on the trade block.

    Jarren Duran

    Seems best to start with the one who currently has rumors attached to him as the GM Meetings in Las Vegas wrap up. Jarren Duran’s name has come up in trade rumors since his break out 2024 season when a portion of the media and fan base believed the team should have sold high. He followed that season up with a solid, but far less impressive, 2025 campaign. The biggest pro of trading Duran is that it opens up left field for Anthony and allows Rafaela and Abreu to play their natural positions in center and right field. Both men just won Gold Gloves and shouldn’t be moved off them for anyone else on the roster.

    Can Duran even play center or right? Technically yes, but he’s best suited for left field, as his throwing arm leaves a lot to be desired from any other outfield position. He continues to be an obvious fit as the centerpiece of a trade package to a team that’s willing to deal a starting pitcher back to the Red Sox. The flip side here is that Duran is a locker room favorite and a team leader. His absence would leave a void that would have to be filled, which isn't as easy as simply buying a veteran in free agency—Duran is one of the longes-tenured members of the roster.

    Wilyer Abreu

    Fresh off his back-to-back Gold Glove wins, it may be hard to envision the Red Sox trading the rising star that is Wilyer Abreu. Stranger things have happened though. Abreu spent a portion of the last half of the season on the injured list and when he returned, he was a shell of himself. That being said, he was second on the team in home runs and served as a spark on both sides of the ball when healthy. Similar to Duran above, the biggest pro in trading Abreu is opening up a full-time position for Roman Anthony. Anthony played a great right field before he was injured, so there should be a decent level of comfortability with him taking the position over full time.

    Abreu, with an extra year of team control and several birthdays separating him from Duran, should fetch a nice haul in a trade. The biggest con in trading him is that the Red Sox may actually be selling low on his potential; he continues to get better with each passing year and hasn't even had a chance to play every day without the benefit of a platoon partner. His absence would leave a lineup that already lacked power with even fewer options. We’ve talked about how thin this free-agent market is, and unless the team plans to bring in both Kyle Schwarber and Pete Alonso in free agency, Abreu’s departure would come close to zapping the team of its power entirely.

    Ceddanne Rafaela

    While it would be shocking to see the team trade Rafaela, it’s not out of the realm of possibility. He’s a first-time Gold Glove winner and plays arguably the best center field defense in the entire league. He’s shown flashes of potential on offense and has a propensity for coming through in big moments. Typically though, his offense is boom or bust and he’s best suited for the bottom of the lineup. His contract makes him a steal for most teams, and that’s likely the biggest reason he could be available for the right price this winter. The only positive that can be found from trading him is that the team could potentially upgrade his position with an offensive-minded center fielder like Cody Bellinger, but that also comes as the biggest con of moving him: the team would lose its best defender. At such a premium position like center field, losing Rafaela’s glove would put the team in a much worse position than they current are.


    Masataka Yoshida was left off of this list because he barely played in the outfield during the 2025 season and honestly, most people expect that he will not be with the club come 2026. He’s never going to live up to his contract, but he has the ability to catch fire in a bottle and be productive. It wouldn’t be shocking to see him involved in a trade with any of the outfielders mentioned above to try and make salaries match for a second playoff-caliber starter.

    The Red Sox have so much talent at positions of need for a lot of teams in the league and they’d be smart to capitalize on that as the offseason begins to progress. Remember, none of this conversation thus far has mentioned Kristian Campbell or Jhostynxon Garcia. With the GM Meetings in the rearview mirror, all eyes turn to the Winter Meetings where Craig Breslow made his biggest trade to date last year. Will history repeat itself this time around?

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos

    Red Sox Top Prospects

    Sadbiel Delzine

    Salem RidgeYaks - A, RHP
    The 6-foot-5, 18-year-old struck out five batters in three scoreless, one-hit innings. It was his fifth Salem start, and in 18 total innings, he has a 2.50 ERA and 1.11 WHIP. 23 Ks to 6 BB.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Except Crochet...and oh yea...Narvaez...

    c'mon moon....put down the bong for a minute. yeah, we gave up a shitload for Crochet but holyf*** have the Sox been fleeced in nearly every trade they've made since DD was canned.

    3 hours ago, UtahSox said:

    Yikes….. Okamoto, Polanco, Story, Mayer, Anthony, Rafaela, Abreu, W/ Romy/ Yoshida @DH……. Bottom 10 offense with high strikeout rates here we come!

    We were #7 in scoring last year and had an OPS of .745.  Ignoring Okamoto, since I can't find good projections for him, a team of Casas, Polanco, Story, Mayer, Anthony, Rafaela, Abreu, Yoshida, and Narvaez, projects to an OPS of .752, according to Steamer.

    1 hour ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    Absolutely -- and it wasn't just the dumb Bronx series where the longball could've changed everything. ALL the other playoff rounds had games decided by HRs.

    It got to the point that even an ex-pitcher like Breslow finally admitted that in order to go deep in October, teams have to hit big flies deep into the night.

    We absolutely did not hit in the playoffs, but if Duran doesn't drop a fly ball, or if the runner was sent, etc.

    21 minutes ago, Duran Is The Man said:

    c'mon moon....put down the bong for a minute. yeah, we gave up a shitload for Crochet but holyf*** have the Sox been fleeced in nearly every trade they've made since DD was canned.

    Pick up a bong, dude! Pack a big bowl and light er up. My stoney memory is better than yours!

    I'm looking at Brez and seeing more good than average or bad.

    Good: Crochet, Narvaez, Slaten, Fitts & Weissert for Dugo, scraps for O'Neill, Yorke for Priester

    OK or TBD:, Sonny Gray, minor deals- Steve Matz, Sandlin

    Bad: Sale, Devers (so far) Priester (so far), minor deals-L Garcia, L Sims, Paxton, D May

    4 hours ago, Duran Is The Man said:

    c'mon moon....put down the bong for a minute. yeah, we gave up a shitload for Crochet but holyf*** have the Sox been fleeced in nearly every trade they've made since DD was canned.

    Nobody bats 1.000 in trades. I love the job bres-slow has done thus far 

    1 minute ago, Larry Cook said:

    Nobody bats 1.000 in trades. I love the job bres-slow has done thus far 

    He's done very well with trades. It's his FAs that have a not paid off.

    I still don't blame him for Sale, but it's the nature of the job to be blamed for a 35 year old injured pitcher to find a second life.

    The Priester trade was also understandable, and maybe Holobetz steals the limelight.

    The Devers trade was a situation caused before the need for the trade. Blame Brez for that, if you want, but a few people have to share in that blame, along with Devers and Cora.

    Crochet, Narvaez, Slaten, O'Neill and the Dugo dump tip the balance to plus. I also think the Gray trade will be a good one, despite the fact that he might not be a #2. Maybe Oviedo surprises us. There is also Fajardo, Sandlin & Holobetz TBD.

    7 hours ago, Larry Cook said:

    Nobody bats 1.000 in trades. I love the job bres-slow has done thus far 

    Especially since a lot of dust hasn’t settled yet.

    Did we already lose Priester for 17yo Yophery Rodriguez, John Holobetz, and the pick that was Marcus Phillips?

    I think when it comes to bad Sox trades, the focus is Sale, Betts and Devers, probably exclusively in many eyes.  The problem is, none of these deals were done for the sole purpose of collecting talent…

    10 hours ago, moonslav59 said:

    He's done very well with trades. It's his FAs that have a not paid off.

    I still don't blame him for Sale, but it's the nature of the job to be blamed for a 35 year old injured pitcher to find a second life.

    The Priester trade was also understandable, and maybe Holobetz steals the limelight.

    The Devers trade was a situation caused before the need for the trade. Blame Brez for that, if you want, but a few people have to share in that blame, along with Devers and Cora.

    Crochet, Narvaez, Slaten, O'Neill and the Dugo dump tip the balance to plus. I also think the Gray trade will be a good one, despite the fact that he might not be a #2. Maybe Oviedo surprises us. There is also Fajardo, Sandlin & Holobetz TBD.

    I agree with most except for the Devers part. I blame Brez 100% for the way the fiasco was handled, and what was handled, and if the Red Sox don’t grossly overpay like the Red Sox already did for 1 year of Bregman, and Bring Bregman back it will all be for a 1, and done, and will be worse than the Mookie fiasco.

    53 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    Every trade is good, or every trade is a bust when you ignore 1/2 of them

    First of all, are you counting every single trade since DD, including no names for no names or just the significant ones? Who determines which ones are significant, as in if a non name for no name trade yields a good player on either side, does the trade then become a good or bad trade? For example, had we traded Priester and he amounted to nothing, it would have never been mentioned, unless Holobetz shines, later.

    No doubt the Betts trade sucks in every way. Go ahead and blame Bloom, despite the fact that DD was close to trading him, too.

    No doubt the Devers trade sucked, and it will suck more if we don't use the money saved to add more talent.

    No doubt the Sale trade ended up sucking and the frail Sale suddenly found health for the first 3/4 of two seasons with ATL, and the hope of Grissom fixing out 2nd base issue fizzled out quickly.

    What other major trades were clear failures?

    Hembree and Workman for Pivetta?

    Did Beni do so well that his trade for Wink and others was some horrible trade?

    Aldo Ramirez for Kyle Schwarber?

    Vazquez for Abreu and E Valdez?

    2 scrub pitchers for T O'Neill?

    Ammons for Slaten?

    A bunch of prospects for Crochet

    Are these major trades?

    Cash for Ottavino? Cash for Y Rios?

    Scherff for H Robles?

    Dugo for Weissert & Fitts?

    Renfroe for JBJ & DHam was a bad one, but Renfroe was no big loss.

    Springs for Ro Hernandez was pretty bad.

    Barnes for Blier?

    3 scrubs for Danny Jansen?

    Yorke for Priester? Then Priester for Holobetz & others.

    Some minor ones I thought of: (Do they count?)

    Chavis for Austin Davis

    Diekman for McGuire

    Blalock for Luis Urias/ Urias for I Campbell

    Bolivar for Paxton

    Schreiber for Sandlin

    Gaspar for Moran

    Booser for Fajardo

    Recents: Fitts & Clarke for Gray/ JGarcia for Oviedo +

    I probably forgot a few, so please list them out.

    Show me more bad trades than good.

    Now, on FA signings, I'll drive the "We Have Sucked Bandwagon."

     

     

    13 minutes ago, Old Red said:

    I agree with most except for the Devers part. I blame Brez 100% for the way the fiasco was handled, and what was handled, and if the Red Sox don’t grossly overpay like the Red Sox already did for 1 year of Bregman, and Bring Bregman back it will all be for a 1, and done, and will be worse than the Mookie fiasco.

    100%?

    A player won't play where he is needed and he gets 0% of the blame?

    A manager is too chicken to ask the player to play a new position: 0% blame?

    Not sure how Bregman factors into discussions about trades, but if you go down that rabbit hole, then the trade is TBD.

    11 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    100%?

    A player won't play where he is needed and he gets 0% of the blame?

    A manager is too chicken to ask the player to play a new position: 0% blame?

    Not sure how Bregman factors into discussions about trades, but if you go down that rabbit hole, then the trade is TBD.

    This has already been gone over 1000 times on here. A player won’t play where he is needed? Did Cora say Raffy was needed at 1B? NO! Cora is too chicken to ask Raffy to play a new position. I know that’s what you believe to fit your constant bad narrative on Raffy after you preached Devers Forevers for years many times over. I don’t think Cora was chicken at all, but didn’t think Raffy would be a good 1B, and didn’t see it benefiting the team. Why to put a lesser bat at DH? Also was 100% behind Raffy telling Brez to do his job. The Red Sox wouldn’t be in such a need of big bats in the lineup if Raffy was still there now would there? That’s all on Brez 100%.👋

    1 hour ago, Hugh2 said:

    I think we’re about to see either Duran or Abreu get delt in the next 6-7 days.  We got the meetings coming up and it’s highly likely to happen when the action takes place.  

    The only reason I want Duran traded instead of Abreu is the ~$8M it saves. That’s it. And the fact we’re even talking about nickel-and-diming like this tells you everything — we’re fully in the “budget team” era now.  It’s wild: ownership disappears, management goes silent, and then their media echo chamber tries to convince us they just “don’t have the money”. COME ON!!

    Red Sox fans aren’t begging the team to keep pace with the Yankees or Dodgers. Ownership has successfully lowered our expectations away from that. We’re literally just saying: don’t get outspent by the Mets, Phillies, AND Blue Jays. When your revenue is firmly top 3–4 in MLB, and 100m + more than Mets, Phils, and BJ’s………. RS fans expecting top-5 spending isn’t greedy — it’s basic.

    That’s the standard this franchise HAS, Red Sox fans are everywhere. There’s a reason that when the Sox roll into a visiting ballpark, it can feel like a home game — the brand is that powerful, that deep, that generational. A franchise with this reach, this history, and this revenue shouldn’t be acting like it’s scraping coins out of the couch cushions. The brand is elite — now it needs ownership to act like it once again. 

    Spending up to the next tax threshold could literally be the difference between a nice season and a legit World Series run. And the front office knows exactly how much revenue a deep October run generates — it pays for itself ten times over. The last few years, whatever… we weren’t that close, so the penny-pinching didn’t sting as much. But this year? This year we’re actually close.

    This is the window where a real organization pushes in, not pulls back. If Sox fall short because they were afraid to cross tax line, that’s on JH — not the roster, not the coaches, not the Front office. 

    3 minutes ago, UtahSox said:

    This is the window where a real organization pushes in, not pulls back. If Sox fall short because they were afraid to cross tax line, that’s on JH — not the roster, not the coaches, not the Front office. 

    I like this. The Yankees are always all in, but they're also desperate to win in the Judge Era. So they sign Cole, Rodon, Fried -- top of the rotation guys at the top of the free agent market every year.

    They also trade a boatload of prospects for Soto, another generational talent. Sucks for them that he left for the Mets, but it was worth it to make the World Series.

    And no regrets dealing those prospects, because the Yankees will just fill those positions when necessary by signing other guys. If there's a bad signing, cut your losses and move on. 

    Boston can also afford to do all of the above, especially now in the Roman Empire.

    12 hours ago, moonslav59 said:

     

    The Devers trade was a situation caused before the need for the trade. Blame Brez for that, if you want, but a few people have to share in that blame, along with Devers

    I believe cora and bres-slow handled the Devers situation badly, no doubt!

    but Devers and his agent caused too much of a distraction to the team and organization for Bres-slow to allow Devers to stay. 

    San Fran graciously rescued us!!   this trade was a win for the Red Sox organization!! 

    1 hour ago, Old Red said:

    This has already been gone over 1000 times on here. A player won’t play where he is needed? Did Cora say Raffy was needed at 1B? NO! Cora is too chicken to ask Raffy to play a new position. I know that’s what you believe to fit your constant bad narrative on Raffy after you preached Devers Forevers for years many times over. I don’t think Cora was chicken at all, but didn’t think Raffy would be a good 1B, and didn’t see it benefiting the team. Why to put a lesser bat at DH? Also was 100% behind Raffy telling Brez to do his job. The Red Sox wouldn’t be in such a need of big bats in the lineup if Raffy was still there now would there? That’s all on Brez 100%.👋

    You've said this a 1000 times, too.

    I guess you remember Devers playing 1B, where we needed him. I don't. It's all Brez's fault,,, LOL!

    11 minutes ago, Larry Cook said:

    I believe cora and bres-slow handled the Devers situation badly, no doubt!

    but Devers and his agent caused too much of a distraction to the team and organization for Bres-slow to allow Devers to stay. 

    San Fran graciously rescued us!!   this trade was a win for the Red Sox organization!! 

    All three had some blame. I could see going 33-33-33 or 50-25-25 or whatever, but in no way is it 100% on anyone. That's my opinion. I can't see how Devers and Cora are 100% blameless.

    1 hour ago, moonslav59 said:

    All three had some blame. I could see going 33-33-33 or 50-25-25 or whatever, but in no way is it 100% on anyone. That's my opinion. I can't see how Devers and Cora are 100% blameless.

    It was 10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 -- that's 10 Asst. VPs who have been entrenched in the front office since at least when Raffy came up as a 20-year-old. 

    They all knew all about him: his personality, and how he'd react when they intentionally wouldn't prepare him for the Bregman acquisition. And poor Devers, by pouting and refusing to bend -- and better yet, calling them out in public -- "forced" the org to wipe that albatross contract clean off the books!

    Devious, for sure. Unbelievable? What's more hard to fathom: that out of an entire overloaded office of the best Ivy League brains a billionaire can collect, not one of these Einsteins could forsee this scenario?

    Not one genius Red Sox Exec felt the need to reach out to the team's sensitive best hitter and highest paid player with the longest tenure BEFORE signing his asterisking replacement?

    Put it another way: if they were all suddenly that dumb, how did  they keep their jobs after losing their one star home run hitter?

     

     

     

    3 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    It was 10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 -- that's 10 Asst. VPs who have been entrenched in the front office since at least when Raffy came up as a 20-year-old. 

    They all knew all about him: his personality, and how he'd react when they intentionally wouldn't prepare him for the Bregman acquisition. And poor Devers, by pouting and refusing to bend -- and better yet, calling them out in public -- "forced" the org to wipe that albatross contract clean off the books!

    Devious, for sure. Unbelievable? What's more hard to fathom: that out of an entire overloaded office of the best Ivy League brains a billionaire can collect, not one of these Einsteins could forsee this scenario?

    Not one genius Red Sox Exec felt the need to reach out to the team's sensitive best hitter and highest paid player with the longest tenure BEFORE signing his asterisking replacement?

    Put it another way: if they were all suddenly that dumb, how did  they keep their jobs after losing their one star home run hitter?

    They could be happy he's gone, toasting with champagne and cashing in their Xmas bonus checks with the Devers money saved.

    These guys are likely high-fiving the fact that they got two TOTR starters for $23M total (21 Gray + 2 Oviedo.)

    They convinced themselves Casas will get 650 PAs and hit 35 bombs.

    They see Anthony as a top 3 MVP vote getter in 2025 and expect Mayer to bust out and hit over .800.

    They think 14 Sp'ers equals 5 great ones.

    They think 2B is not worthy of any sense of decency.
    They have some serious holes to fill. The good thing is there are only 2-3 major holes. The problem is, they just see one or two minor tweaks needed.

     

    53 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    It was 10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 -- that's 10 Asst. VPs who have been entrenched in the front office since at least when Raffy came up as a 20-year-old. 

    They all knew all about him: his personality, and how he'd react when they intentionally wouldn't prepare him for the Bregman acquisition. And poor Devers, by pouting and refusing to bend -- and better yet, calling them out in public -- "forced" the org to wipe that albatross contract clean off the books!

    Devious, for sure. Unbelievable? What's more hard to fathom: that out of an entire overloaded office of the best Ivy League brains a billionaire can collect, not one of these Einsteins could forsee this scenario?

    Not one genius Red Sox Exec felt the need to reach out to the team's sensitive best hitter and highest paid player with the longest tenure BEFORE signing his asterisking replacement?

    Put it another way: if they were all suddenly that dumb, how did  they keep their jobs after losing their one star home run hitter?

     

     

     

    Of course we had some on here with one in particular, who went around doing his Paul Revere impression shouting Devers Forevers, Devers Forevers, Devers Forevers to all, and any who would listen year after year.🤔🤫

    52 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    It was 10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 -- that's 10 Asst. VPs who have been entrenched in the front office since at least when Raffy came up as a 20-year-old. 

    They all knew all about him: his personality, and how he'd react when they intentionally wouldn't prepare him for the Bregman acquisition. And poor Devers, by pouting and refusing to bend -- and better yet, calling them out in public -- "forced" the org to wipe that albatross contract clean off the books!

    Devious, for sure. Unbelievable? What's more hard to fathom: that out of an entire overloaded office of the best Ivy League brains a billionaire can collect, not one of these Einsteins could forsee this scenario?

    Not one genius Red Sox Exec felt the need to reach out to the team's sensitive best hitter and highest paid player with the longest tenure BEFORE signing his asterisking replacement?

    Put it another way: if they were all suddenly that dumb, how did  they keep their jobs after losing their one star home run hitter?

     

     

     

    don't forget Ryan Otero, hired just a few days ago as a "Special Assistant to the CBO". or, maybe, he's just a "special" assistant to the CBO. and Theo....what the f*** happened to him? do we need to put his face on a milk carton?

    3 hours ago, moonslav59 said:

    These guys are likely high-fiving the fact that they got two TOTR starters for $23M total (21 Gray + 2 Oviedo.)

    They convinced themselves Casas will get 650 PAs and hit 35 bombs.

    They see Anthony as a top 3 MVP vote getter in 2025 and expect Mayer to bust out and hit over .800.

    They think 14 Sp'ers equals 5 great ones.

    They think 2B is not worthy of any sense of decency.
    They have some serious holes to fill. The good thing is there are only 2-3 major holes. The problem is, they just see one or two minor tweaks needed.

     

    We have an offer out therefor 4 years to Alonso. The market for Alonso is soft! 
     
    if I were Alonso, I would leverage that offer to get an offer from the Mets!!  

    2 hours ago, Duran Is The Man said:

    don't forget Ryan Otero, hired just a few days ago as a "Special Assistant to the CBO". or, maybe, he's just a "special" assistant to the CBO. and Theo....what the f*** happened to him? do we need to put his face on a milk carton?

    He may be laying low until he can officially change his last name. I'm half serious; he's legendary for achieving ultimate success for two franchises known for decades as lovable losers -- and after he reached those pinnacles, some pundits wondered if he'd be a viable candidate for political office... 

    ... at least for Manfred's job, which comes with as much bs as donkeys and elephants.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...