Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    Red Sox's Trade Deadline Wishlist Following Curtis Mead Blockbuster

    Now that Curtis Mead has been acquired to fill the hole at second base, where should the Red Sox turn with one week left until the trade deadline.

    Ben Lofy
    Image courtesy of © Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

    The first domino has fallen. After months of being involved in mock trades and rumors, pitcher Connelly Early was traded to the Washington Nationals for infielder Curtis Mead over the weekend.

    A former top-40 prospect, Mead has enjoyed a breakout season in 2026. He’s blasted 17 round-trippers and his underlying metrics suggest that his swing is built for Fenway. Mead’s wRC+ of 134 is good for third on the Boston Red Sox behind Jahmai Jones (in a small sample) and Willson Contreras. He checks the box for a right-handed impact bat, but the roster still has plenty of needs, including potentially another right-handed slugger. 

    While the market for catchers is still largely abstract, there are a few names that could catch chief baseball officer Craig Breslow's eye. Carlos Narvaez and Connor Wong have split time behind the plate this season, but between Narvaez’s regression as a hitter and Wong’s inconsistency, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the Red Sox make a big splash. Following Shea Langelier's injury, the Sox could turn their sights to Colorado's Hunter Goodman, Minnesota’s Ryan Jeffers, or New York’s Francisco Alvarez for some more thump in the lineup. 

    Goodman is having a career year and the Rockies would demand a king's ransom in exchange for the 26-year-old who has three more years of team control. However, Goodman already has 31 homers on the year and would slot in as the Red Sox's best hitter not named Contreras.

    A slightly more realistic avenue would be the Twins’ Ryan Jeffers. Coming off of a two-month absence due to a hamate bone injury, Jeffers is one of the best rental hitters on the trade market; he's batting close to .300 and would be a worthy addition to the lineup. A free agent after the 2026 season, he wouldn’t be as expensive as Goodman, but the Red Sox would still have to pay a pretty penny. 

    A more under-the-radar candidate would be New York’s Francisco Alvarez. Batting .260 with 12 homers on the year, Alvarez has an OPS of .740 with average defensive metrics. Trading for Alvarez would take a haul due to his immense upside, but he’s under control until 2029 and could help give the Red Sox long-term stability behind the dish. 

    Elsewhere on the roster, Mead will plug in at second base, giving the Red Sox a plethora of infield utility options, but none with consistent or outstanding offensive numbers. Should the team stay complacent at catcher, they could pursue an upgrade at shortstop. Between Trevor Story’s season hampered by injury and Marcelo Mayer’s consistent struggles, an upgrade might be necessary. 

    According to Bob Nightingale of USA Today, the Red Sox would “love” to acquire either the Angel’s Zach Neto or the Astro’s Jeremy Peña. Boston checked in on both players this past offseason, but now a trade seems more likely with the poor offensive production at the position so far this season. 

    Neto is batting .236 with 19 bombs this year and a .771 OPS. While his career high 31.5% strikeout rate is worrying and his defense leaves something to be desired, he’s hit at least 23 homers in the last two seasons and is on pace to surpass that again this season. His swing would fit at Fenway, as all but four of his homers in 2026 have been hit to left field.

    Peña is another interesting trade candidate. Despite missing the first month of the season due to injury, the Astros’ infielder is having the best year of his career at the plate with a .315 batting average and a .849 OPS. Peña has no issue getting on base, but with just 28 RBIs and nine homers this season, he lacks the pop the Red Sox might be seeking.

    The Red Sox have also loosely been tied to Nationals’ shortstop C.J. Abrams, but it’s hard to see the Nationals giving up their young star for anything less than a king's ransom.

    As enticing as a shortstop trade might be, the Red Sox might be reluctant to go big with top prospect Franklin Arias waiting in the wings in Worcester. Boston could try and swing a trade for a rental bat at shortstop before calling on Arias in the coming seasons. 

    The only other position of immediate need for Boston is in the bullpen. Although the Red Sox have one of the best bullpens in the game, a high-leverage reliever to eat late innings is always beneficial, especially if they part ways with Aroldis Chapman. If the Mets decide to blow it all up, a pair of solid relievers could be on the market. 

    Luke Weaver has been nothing short of outstanding in his first year in Queens. A 1.98 ERA through 41 innings speaks for itself, but when you add in a 0.805 WHIP and an xERA of 2.80, you get one of the best relief arms on the market. Right-handed relief isn’t a necessity for Boston, and the Mets would demand a high return, but with a lack of left-handed relief pitching on the market, acquiring Weaver could make Boston’s pen the best in the sport. 

    A.J. Minter is another potential trade chip from the same source. In 22 games this season, Minter has recorded a 2.45 ERA and an impressive 1.045 WHIP.  A look under the hood is slightly more worrisome as an xERA of 3.71 dictates some amount of luck is baked into his results. His groundball rate is also 10% lower than the past two seasons. Despite the concerns and being a step down from Weaver, Minter is still a quality arm and could be a more affordable option. Additionally, Minter fills the left-handed relief role the Red Sox are hungry for.

    Acquiring players at any of the three positions would be a boon at the trade deadline, making a scorching hot Red Sox squad more dangerous in advance of the postseason.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos

    Red Sox Top Prospects

    Justin Gonzales

    Portland Sea Dogs - AA, OF
    The 19-year-old went 3-for-4 with 2 HR on Sunday and is headed to AA Portland. In 89 High-A games, he hit .271/.391/.463 (.828) with 12 doubles, 2 triples, and 17 HR.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    40 minutes ago, JoeBrady said:

    So we trade for an SP, and keep him in the BP until someone goes down?  Like Moon said, maybe demote Tolle for 15 days and maybe do two 3-inning stints just to keep sharp, and then do the same with Bennett.

    Maybe I'm just being superstitious and hate to mess with what's working.

    Maybe? or you roll with a 6 man rotation.  Not for the whole season but teams employ that over a 1-2 month stretch much much more often than I realized until I looked into it.  It makes sense. 

    I mean if you're superstitious, wouldn't you be concerned with another Sox pitcher going down? pitchers go down like flies nowadays and we've ran through all our depth. 

    We could also (or in addition to a starter) pick up another guy who has options who can go up/down. 

    15 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    Maybe not as much as we expect.

    They're both very large strong humans: 6 foot 6, between 230-250 pounds. There is a chance "smaller" pitchers like Suarez and Early pull muscles because they have to generate more force from their bodies in their own deliveries.

    I have no evidence to prove the notion, but there is at least a possibility that dimensions -- however inflated in PR guides -- could affect longevity. 

    How'd that work for 6'6" 245 lb Garrett Crochet? 

    8 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    Maybe not as much as we expect.

    They're both very large strong humans: 6 foot 6, between 230-250 pounds. There is a chance "smaller" pitchers like Suarez and Early pull muscles because they have to generate more force from their bodies in their own deliveries.

    I have no evidence to prove the notion, but there is at least a possibility that dimensions -- however inflated in PR guides -- could affect longevity. 

    I mean, we've been witnessing this for a few years now, especially in the modern game where pitchers pitch harder than they ever have. 

    It's not just the risk of fatigue but how will that effect them the following season? Is Crochetts injury related to such? He went from 24 innings to 146 innings to 200 innings and now he's going to miss most of this year. 

    Actually the more I research this the more confusing it becomes.  There actually isn't any real hard evidence to support this.  However, teams obviously really care about workload, I think there is more evidence that guys get fatigued.  I still, even with lack of evidence of the correlation of injury and increased workload, believe starting pitching should be a priority.  Because all our depth is gone.  It's just gone.  Right now our next starters up are. 

    Bello/Wehunt and that's it.  The next two guys in WOO are Raymond Burgos and Michael Sansone who would need to be added to the 40 man.  

    6 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    RP is always on the wish list, but the backend of the bullpen has been doing their part lately.

     

    The whole bullpen has been much better than I thought they were ealier this year. 

    With Slaten stepping it up the Slaten/Whitlock/CHapman back end has been nails. 

    Tyron Guerrero has been good, Weissert and Watson have looked better recently as well. Not great but fine for 6th inning guys and Jovani Moran has been really good lately. 

    I'm sure they could still use a depth arm, or some talent with options.  

    5 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    I mean, we've been witnessing this for a few years now, especially in the modern game where pitchers pitch harder than they ever have. 

    It's not just the risk of fatigue but how will that effect them the following season? Is Crochetts injury related to such? He went from 24 innings to 146 innings to 200 innings and now he's going to miss most of this year. 

    Actually the more I research this the more confusing it becomes.  There actually isn't any real hard evidence to support this.  However, teams obviously really care about workload, I think there is more evidence that guys get fatigued.  I still, even with lack of evidence of the correlation of injury and increased workload, believe starting pitching should be a priority.  Because all our depth is gone.  It's just gone.  Right now our next starters up are. 

    Bello/Wehunt and that's it.  The next two guys in WOO are Raymond Burgos and Michael Sansone who would need to be added to the 40 man.  

    Great post.

    Our real SP'er depth is the IL. No way we hand the ball to Wehunt, Burgos or Sansone for a big game.

    No SP'er on the IL looks close to a return. None are even rehabbing in actual games. While our 4 man rotation on the 60 Day IL might be a top 10 rotation in MLB, what good is it, if none return?

    60 Day: Crochet, Houck, Crawford & Oviedo

    Ideally, we could count on Bello as the 6th starter, and using an opener followed by 5 IP from Bello essentially eats the same IP as a starter, but I'm not comfortable entering the final two months with nothing beyond Bello and Sandoval as the #5.

    Add to that the IP limits on Tolle & Bennett, and adding a pitcher seems like a no-brainer.

    On the pen being better than expected. This seems to have happened for 3-4 years in a row. Maybe we need to give some credit to Sox management for achieving this so often. It can't be a fluke.

    I remember when we signed Chapman: many felt he was a good back-up closer or good set-up man. Many worried about Whitlock being ruined by the starter experiment. Slaten was rather unknown. Weissert was ridiculed. We patched the rest of the pen with guys like Bernardino, Wilson, Murphy and Kelly.

    Brez was grateful to Bloom for handing him Jansen and Martin, but both slipped a little in 2024. Guys like Weissert & Slaten led the team in RP IP and did well. Bernardino & Booser did well, but others like Wink, Chase Anderson, Keller and Horn not so well.

    fWAR pen rankings:

    3rd 2026

    2nd 2025

    16th 2024

    13th 2023 (Bloom)

    4th since Brez took over ('24-'26)

    From '25-'26:

    2nd in fWAR

    1st in ERA-

    1st in ERA, WHIP & FIP

    24 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    I mean, we've been witnessing this for a few years now, especially in the modern game where pitchers pitch harder than they ever have. 

    It's not just the risk of fatigue but how will that effect them the following season? Is Crochetts injury related to such? He went from 24 innings to 146 innings to 200 innings and now he's going to miss most of this year. 

    Actually the more I research this the more confusing it becomes.  There actually isn't any real hard evidence to support this.   

    ... to support anything. Nobody knows anything because everyone is different. Oviedo's been out all year with a sore elbow. He's a giant but didn't throw a million pitches last year because he was returning from missing his first entire season in 2024.

    Derek Lowe, a big guy, and Pedro Martinez, not so big, left Boston via free agency after '04. DLowe wound up throwing three times as many more innings the rest of his career than Pedro.

    Dwight Gooden was tall and slim for his day when he was an instant star at 19 and pitched over 200 innings while leading the league in strikeouts. The Mets protected him so much the next season they let him lead the NL in IP with 276 and win the Cy Young. 

    Gooden would average over 200 IP through the first decade of his career and miss more time because of drug addiction than overuse.

    1 hour ago, moonslav59 said:

    Giving them a 2-3 start total rest may work better, but they could get rusty.

    That's my concern.  I kind of think pitchers are more creatures of habit and routine than most, and don't want them to lose their rhythm.  I can defer to Breslow and Baily on the psychology.

    Just now, JoeBrady said:

    That's my concern.  I kind of think pitchers are more creatures of habit and routine than most, and don't want them to lose their rhythm.  I can defer to Breslow and Baily on the psychology.

    I'm more worried about these two young pitchers running out of steam just as we make the playoffs than needing a start or two to get over rustiness.

    Of course, making the playoffs is no given, so resting these guys hurt those chances, but adding a capable innings eater helps mitigate that loss (on paper.)

    22 minutes ago, 5GoldGlovesOF,75 said:

    ... to support anything. Nobody knows anything because everyone is different. Oviedo's been out all year with a sore elbow. He's a giant but didn't throw a million pitches last year because he was returning from missing his first entire season in 2024.

    Derek Lowe, a big guy, and Pedro Martinez, not so big, left Boston via free agency after '04. DLowe wound up throwing three times as many more innings the rest of his career than Pedro.

    Dwight Gooden was tall and slim for his day when he was an instant star at 19 and pitched over 200 innings while leading the league in strikeouts. The Mets protected him so much the next season they let him lead the NL in IP with 276 and win the Cy Young. 

    Gooden would average over 200 IP through the first decade of his career and miss more time because of drug addiction than overuse.

    I still want to buy pitching.  Also, even if there was a strong correlation between workload increase and injuries that wouldn't mean that injuries wouldn't exist in the absence.  Theres' more than one way to skin a cat, it's also true that there are more ways for something to go wrong. 

    7 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    I still want to buy pitching.  Also, even if there was a strong correlation between workload increase and injuries that wouldn't mean that injuries wouldn't exist in the absence.  Theres' more than one way to skin a cat, it's also true that there are more ways for something to go wrong. 

    If the worst thing that happens is we have to demote Moran, Guerrero or give Watson back, it would  be because someone else is better.

    What's the chance we finish 2026 with no more pitchers going on the IL?

    While I really like our current 13, number 14, 15 and 16 scare me.

    14 Rivera

    15 Gamboa

    16 Samaniego

    17 Uberstine

    IL pitcher La Sorsa is the only one not on the 60 IL

    Non 40: Wehunt, Burgos, Sansone, Bastardo, Holobetz, Paez, Mullins, Eyanson

    12 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    If the worst thing that happens is we have to demote Moran, Guerrero or give Watson back, it would  be because someone else is better.

    How many available RPs are pitching better than those 3 right now (over the past 28 days, 1.74, 0.96, and 2.70)?  I know these are small samples for guys with limited experience, but in a world of limited resources, I am not inclined to improve our BP.

    7 minutes ago, JoeBrady said:

    How many available RPs are pitching better than those 3 right now (over the past 28 days, 1.74, 0.96, and 2.70)?  I know these are small samples for guys with limited experience, but in a world of limited resources, I am not inclined to improve our BP.

    Id rather we add a SP to force a demotion of one of those 3, and I really dont think any of them deserve a emotion, but someone will get hurt, and if we have to do it, it would only be because the guy we added is better, equal or can pitch more IP as a starter.

    To me, having a solid 13 is great, but #14-16 scare me bigtime. We've already used 25 pitchers, which is nearly double 13. We've used 21 pitchers for 9 or more IP. 18 pitchers have 14+ IP and Sandoval is the guy with 14. He's projected to reach 50+. Guerrero is at 24 and could reach 40-50.

    Add a SP'er and find a way to make it work. If a really good pitcher has to be demoted for a few days, so be it.

    36 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    If the worst thing that happens is we have to demote Moran, Guerrero or give Watson back, it would  be because someone else is better.

    What's the chance we finish 2026 with no more pitchers going on the IL?

    While I really like our current 13, number 14, 15 and 16 scare me.

    14 Rivera

    15 Gamboa

    16 Samaniego

    17 Uberstine

    IL pitcher La Sorsa is the only one not on the 60 IL

    Non 40: Wehunt, Burgos, Sansone, Bastardo, Holobetz, Paez, Mullins, Eyanson

    Anyone who is willing to bet we have zero injuries on the pitching side thru seasons end has some serious balls. 

    15 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    There were a lot of injuries in the first half. Maybe the bad luck is just out of the way? 

    Oh, I'm certain it is, but that doesn't mean an injury can't strike.  

    Regardless, there's a difference between being hopeful about a clean bill of health than not being prepared for it.  The pitching could use help, doesn't have to be high end it can be more depth but at the very least we need depth.

    1 hour ago, Hugh2 said:

    I still want to buy pitching.  Also, even if there was a strong correlation between workload increase and injuries that wouldn't mean that injuries wouldn't exist in the absence.  Theres' more than one way to skin a cat, it's also true that there are more ways for something to go wrong. 

    How many ways do we need to skin a cat? And why is anyone doing this at all?

    12 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    Oh, I'm certain it is, but that doesn't mean an injury can't strike.  

    Regardless, there's a difference between being hopeful about a clean bill of health than not being prepared for it.  The pitching could use help, doesn't have to be high end it can be more depth but at the very least we need depth.

    Yeah, I don't think they want to call upon Uberstine as he's not stretched out. Wehunt really shouldn't be called up yet. Any help has to come from outside the org once you get beyond plugging Bello back into the rotation. 

    I wonder what is going on with Mullins this year? I thought he would be in line to help out by the end of this season at least for bulk relief innings. 

    24 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    Yeah, I don't think they want to call upon Uberstine as he's not stretched out. Wehunt really shouldn't be called up yet. Any help has to come from outside the org once you get beyond plugging Bello back into the rotation. 

    I wonder what is going on with Mullins this year? I thought he would be in line to help out by the end of this season at least for bulk relief innings. 

    I don't think his 5.21 ERA in Portland is inspiring too many folks about him performing any better up two levels in the bigs.  He also walks a lot of guys.  Love the K rate though, he could be more in a relief role.  But like.......they're still starting him. 

    3 hours ago, Hugh2 said:

    Anyone who is willing to bet we have zero injuries on the pitching side thru seasons end has some serious balls. 

    Exactly, and looking at our #14-16 pitchers left on the already depleted depth chart should be enough to scare anyone into putting pitching as a high need on the deadline add list.

    Nationals get

    Franklin Arias

    Jake Bennett

    Justin Gonzalez

    Marcus Phillips

    2x lower level players

     

    RED SOX get

    CJ Abram’s

    Foster Griffin

    it’s at least a good starting point

    Washington gets a haul (including Bennett back, looking much better at the MLb level) and the Sox get a rental for the stretch and their SS for the next few years and hopefully lock up long term.

     

     

    3 hours ago, moonslav59 said:

    Id rather we add a SP to force a demotion of one of those 3, and I really dont think any of them deserve a emotion, but someone will get hurt, and if we have to do it, it would only be because the guy we added is better, equal or can pitch more IP as a starter.

     

    I'd second that demotion.. 

    5 minutes ago, southpaw777 said:

    Nationals get

    Franklin Arias

    Jake Bennett

    Justin Gonzalez

    Marcus Phillips

    2x lower level players

     

    RED SOX get

    CJ Abram’s

    Foster Griffin

    it’s at least a good starting point

    Washington gets a haul and the Sox get a rental for the stretch and their SS for the next few years and hopefully lock up long term.

     

     

    Swapping out Bennett for Griffin?  Hard pass…

    17 hours ago, notin said:

    Swapping out Bennett for Griffin?  Hard pass…

    Hard pass? Why?

    Bennet will not be available for the playoffs and probably September anyways with his IP limits. We get a rental who’s as good this year as Bennett is, for down the stretch that doesn’t have an IP limit…I’m sure we can get another starter this offseason. 
    if you want Abram’s we’re going to have to get uncomfortable. But he’s a proven stud at SS for the long term. If they’ll take Eyanson instead or Eyanson and say Valera, I’d do that too…

    like I said…it’s a good starting point. I want to win this year. If Bennett or any other pitcher not named Tolle will make it happen, then I’d do it.

    1 hour ago, moonslav59 said:

    RH'd RF'er?

    Abreu is killing lefties.

    When you look at their full stat lines, Abreu and Rafaela are having very similar seasons , including the most important stat:  AVAILABILTY        Cedanne has played in 101 of 105 games and Wilyer in 103 .  Contrares has racked up 98 games, despite his 5 day vacay,   and Duran also has 98 games played.

    Predictably, these 4 guys are the RBI leaders in the clubhouse .




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...