Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

drewski6

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,537

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by drewski6

  1. drewski6
    I dont think any catcher could be the steal of the winter. I think 90% of catchers can be lumped in with each other. Could be wrong
  2. drewski6
    Its Crochet.
  3. drewski6
    Most of us would want Bregman at 3yrs / 75M. Most of us would want him at 2 yrs / 60M. But hes just not at the point where he is willing to accept a short term deal, and I dont think he will get there (I think he'll find a 5 yr deal). If the 5 yr offers get pulled and he overplays his hand and he has to retreat to a short term contract, then of course, we'll be interested. But it really doesnt make sense for him to take a 1 yr deal. Everyone knows he can still play at a high level, so I think he has more to lose than to gain to kick the can down the road 1 yr, and see whats available 1 yr from now when hes 1 yr older (coming off a 1 yr deal, even if he's 5 WAR in that year)
  4. drewski6
    I agree. Not thinking of any posters/fans in mind, but even some of my personal friends....Its like 1) Why dont the sox spend money! How did they let themselves get and remain so mediocre this 1/2 decade ..... and then 2) (After every FA signing, league wide) What an overpay! You cant have it both ways. Again, not directed at anybody here. Unless Bregman has all offers of 5yrs+ pulled, he isnt taking a shorter one. I agree at this point, we are long shots at best for him, and Ive made my peace with that. He was always a plan C behind Soto and Teoscar.
  5. drewski6
    In the beginning of the offseason, i wanted to upgrade oneill but considered him an acceptable fallback, but ive moved on from both options at this point in time and agree.
  6. drewski6
    I dont think hed take 30-35 1 yr deal. If you want the sox to be serious, you need to give term (not always, but more often than not we're losing guys for the length we are unwilling to go).
  7. drewski6
    We seriously considered making him an offer
  8. drewski6
    If hes hitting .280 and throwing guys out like he did in 2023, I just dont think its possible that hes a problem. Certainly not enough of a problem to warrant taking his bat out of the lineup and replacing him with an all D noodle bat. Or to warrant further depletion from the farm. Personally, I think hes close to average , like almost every other starting catcher in the league. If the arm doesnt improve and he remains at -14 DRS (TY, MVP for the stat) thats different, but if he gets to where he was in 2023, I think its good enough considering hes above average hitting (for a catcher) and gunning guys down, and the fact that a lot of the stuff that catchers use to be responsible for is now called from the dugout. Stuff changes. And what you look for in a catcher has changed vs a few years ago
  9. drewski6
    Tertiary
  10. drewski6
    Are these stats all encompassing? As in, do they take blocking , framing, tagging, and arm all into account?
  11. drewski6
    This whole thing has gotten nutty to me, but Im fully convinced that DHs are the most underpaid players / best free agent values you can find. A DH who anchors your lineup is worth huge. If he hits in the middle and is your top source of RBIs, that dude is undeniably extremely valuable. Occupying positions is not quite an after-thought, but for positional players....the value is the bat. Maybe a top defensive SS, maybe 1/2 of their value comes from D. And thats really the only place where defense can matter as much. Just look at everyones WAR. Its like offensive WAR - 4. Devensive WAR - 8. Overall WAR (everything included) - 4.3
  12. drewski6
    Theres also a durability component. I have no problem with Raffi DH'ing. We need the bat.
  13. drewski6
    Right , and you can make that projection right now, after another signing is made, and at any point during the season, and the projected fWAR will likely vary based on when you are projecting it.
  14. drewski6
    They do it. All 2025 WARs out right now are projected. Snapshot in time being when the projections were made.
  15. drewski6
    Agreed, but thats not talking about the same thing. The initial conversation related to the impact to projected fWAR at a snapshot in time (immediately after Bregman signing) and you are talking about fWAR at a different snapshot in time (after conclusion of reg season)
  16. drewski6
    Why these two is because they were outbid on everyone who they wanted who was better
  17. drewski6
    After 800 innings , your paying for what he did. At 200 , you are paying for what he is going to do (nods at Notin). Good scouts and GMs shouldnt need a long resume to know if he can get batters out. Trust the talent level that your scouts/coaches/front-office dudes assign to him (after all, you are paying your assessors). Trust your own eyes also. Proof is for p*ssies. Take a leap.
  18. drewski6
    Id rather have the guy with less wear and tear.
  19. drewski6
    No, our offense is disturbingly mediocre and we've signed 0 bats.
  20. drewski6
    I actually think our pitching is closer to the braves than our offense. Last year, their top position player didnt play a position, he was a DH :0 The year before they had 3 silver sluggers and Ozuna the fourth big bat , received MVP votes. Our hitting is not on this level. I was screaming about getting Ozuna years back. It shouldnt be too hard to get there. The league is underrating the impact of DH's/1Bs who mash. All you have to do is stop obsessing about defense, pitching, all these other peripheral things and return to what we did when we were successfull. Prioritize hitting
  21. drewski6
    Even more Louis Rengifo. It will get to the point where guys who are one position specialists are rare. Its already kind of heading that way, but it will full get there.
  22. drewski6
    Thats fair.
  23. drewski6
    Yes, more of it.
  24. drewski6
    No, anything can be fine. Theres a universe out there with a team that was 30th in offense won a world series. But my point is merely that having a great offense makes everything else easier moreso than having a great pitching staff does and having a great defense and hitting should be prioritized as a result. Im not trying to nuance / dial-in elite hitting vs having elite hitters and get all ocd about my word choice. If my exact phrasing is jumping around (and Im not doubting that it is), its not intentional.
  25. drewski6
    The Royals had crazy likability. Everyone likes a late bloomer and they had a few of them.
×
×
  • Create New...