There seems to be some confusion over the difference of a bad trade vs. the decision to trade someone.
Mookie Betts was my favorite player, I knew he was going to be a star when he was in Salem. We can say the decision to trade him was the worse decision in a very very long time. But that should stand alone on the return, think of it as a sunk cost. Reality is you were trading what ended up being a 1/3 of a season of Betts. Players without team control, no matter how good they are, are only going to bring back so much.
Yes trading Betts was stupid, and it f***ing sucked, but the return was fine.
If Betts had 2-3 years of control left I would have expected a MUCH higher return. This is how these things work.