I didn't have time to find a spot about something that I'm sure has been discussed probably in other threads, but here it goes.
Alex Cora is a genius, well argued by his current 111 wins. He made all the right moves v. Yankees, plays Holt/Devers, goes back to Nunez/Kinsler. Pulls Porcello early, brings in Sale. Has relievers start innings and then has them on a 1-inning leash period--123 or with baserunners. He gives the whole logic of not hitting Holt after the Cycle, how the matchups do this, and that. And he's been right.
....
Now, here's my problem with Alex Cora in game 4 yesterday. This is a guy who made sure he pulled Price before it had any potential of going uglier than 3 runs. This is the guy who takes Sale out after 16 outs due to pitch count. He set this game to go to Kimbrel in the 9th. And why not, 42 saves, and looked brilliant in the 5-4 win at home, etc. When Kimbrel was clearly wild, not getting a breaking ball over for a strike, missing on low fastballs inside, outside, hits a batter, almost hit another batter...In all this, there is a shot of an empty Sox bullpen. OUTRAGEOUSLY STUPID for analytics/strategy/today's game. Grady Little lost his job for putting all his faith in Pedro. Cora decided to do the same with Kimbrel. I say ********!
How come it's okay to put leashes and limits and play with pitchers based on performance and time, then turn right around and go "oh, well Craig is on his own, and I'm not budging." Am I saying you go to another reliever/starter to replace him at any point. Hell yes. He should have had Workman and Price and whomever else had a live arm warming up to face anyone. Electric stuff, 99 fastballs don't mean anything if you can't throw strikes. It's a complete double standard to put all your eggs in one basket (one pitcher). No way. If the philosophy is maximize performance, prevent any Yankee comeback by using your pen, then Kimbrel was not doing his job. He got the save out of sheer luck. The ball hit by Sanchez was over the Monster and it's possible that if a lefthanded Moreland was at 1st, the ball would have skipped past him on Nunez rushed throw, game over. Bottom line, he went like the old time managers with his closer. Live by my closer, die by my closer. ******** again. That philosophy cost the 1986 Red Sox. There is no rule now that says you have to have a set closer anyway. There are so many things that being done backward, including relievers who start, and starters who relief, and pitch counts that are becoming more like 65 than a 100, that everything is open and on the table as far as closing a game. You had Sale and he was sailing, tell me if 90 percent of the Sox fans didn't think it would be better to just let Sale finish off a series-clincher. There was no need other than pride and the closer-belief that prompted going to Kimbrel. It was just an assumption, but made a foregone conclusion.
Let this be a lesson that you don't have to use Kimbrel to closer no matter what. You don't have to do it if you got Porcello in the pen or Sale or it's a series clincher. If Kimbrel is wild, which he is prone to do in big games, it's a circus out there. Last night was a heart attack that went the Sox way. Had Brasier or Barnes walked a single batter, you can bet they are 1 step away from being pulled. Kimbrel? Oh, he has a different set of limits, rules. Nobody warming up in the pen with the game on the line is stupidity. Win or lose. This is the playoffs. This is all bets and standard practices are off. Sale should have started the 9th and if he gave up a baserunner, then maybe I go to Kimbrel. Not just automatically bring him in because he's the closer, and that's it. Yes, it all ended well, but the Astros will not leave Kimbrel off the hook if he gets wild again. Have relievers warming up, and don't go "Price? are you crazy!". It's not about the pitcher who comes in as much as it's about throwing strikes and not giving away bases due to wildness.
Thank you, back to celebrating, Go Sox!!! Go Cora!! Let's win 119.