notin
-
Posts
53,380 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by notin
-
First, he seems to get hurt regardless of where he plays. Even if the Sox benched him, he’d probably get terminal hemorrhoids. Second, the Sox have other options there who have proven they cannot handle SS..
-
There’s a need. He just hasn’t been attentive enough to fill it.
-
Exactly. It’s proof he’s so good, you don’t take him out even when his DRS falls to -8…
-
My fear is I’ve already overhyped him. He could never live up to the levels of advanced mediocrity I’ve been calling for. (But I’d be happy if they did get him.)
-
No, they give you another gallon of milk, not knowing whether or not it’s also sour…
-
If he pitched, the option was a clever way to ensure he’d reject a QO. They had faith he would pitch well enough to make this matter…
-
Side with me? I never wanted him and don’t trust him. All I’ve done is accept him and hope he can stay on the field. I don’t think he’s a bad player, but I don’t think he’s irreplaceable either.
-
Is leaving in a pitcher who’s gone 4 perfect innings on 52 pitches instead of an overworked bullpen really a miraculous achievement?
-
For me? Im not the guy who already signed Hendriks (and Fulmer, who also has closing experience). And not going to be the guy who packages Mayer for pitching, leaving Story as the only SS on the roster with anything remotely resembling a defensive skill set…
-
Yeah yeah yeah. And Sale hadn’t been a productive starter since 2019 and is now 35. Are we learning lessons here or not? Hope or not, we both (and hundreds of thousands of others) know that if Story is healthy, he’s the starting shortstop. And will be for as long as that lasts…
-
Yes. September call ups used to get no credit for service time…
-
If the Sox had simply kept Sale, they’d be in right now, right? That’s one pitcher away…
-
Having seen the Sox spend and lose anyway (2015, for example), why prioritize it over making the postseason? If the Sox actually get in, that’s a good thing…
-
Nobody. Season will be over…
-
We’re not Texas! We’re not Texas!! Didn’t that team win a ring a couple months back?
-
Surprised no Wong at DH. Especially with Gasper on the roster… -
1. It’s going to be Story, at least until he breaks again. 2. 2b is likely between Hamilton and Grissom. Hamilton because he’s earned continued chances, and Grissom because they very likely want to give him a proper opportunity. They didn’t post $17mill on Sale’s salary to run up a white flag on 87 post-injury plate appearances. 3. Agreed. Although I suspect more likely a trade than a contract. SI thinks they’re marketing Mayer in just such a trade. Possible. 4. Hendriks? Isn’t this why they got him in the first place? 5. Yes. Yes. A thousand times yes! First up should be Duran and Houck…
-
He very likely does. The Astros originally hired Cora because he was one of the most knowledgeable abut analytics. According to Andy Martino in “Cheated,” Cora looked at what the Astros were doing and told them how far behind the curve they were, and then pushed them ahead to where they needed to be. Among MLB managers, Cora has the reputation as being the most knowledgeable about all their analytics. The Sox may have pre-determined Criswell was only going 4IP, but they didn’t do so without some input from Cora…
-
Paxton’s rather significant and recent injury history probably made him less of a desirable trade acquisition than Xander Bogaerts and maybe even JD Martinez the year before. But the decision both years to fritter, hum, twitter, waffle, and possibly even dawdle for two deadlines in a row was such a detriment.
-
That’s some extremely cursory data analysis. It ignores all the other low spending successes like Milwaukee and Cleveland. As well as all the high spenders that rarely make the postseason, like the Mets, Giants and White Sox. I suspect this relationship is less clear than you think…
-
It’s not convoluted. If the Yankees lose tonight, 50% of the division leaders are near the top in payroll and the other 50% are near the bottom. So that means your data is precarious. To me, it looks like spending is the easy way to compete. It’s no guarantee. The only guarantee is that eventually those big contracts wind down and the players bought decline, and that’s a tough situation to get out of. If the Sox are going to spend, it should be mostly on extension for arb-eligible players, or ones not yet arb-eligible…
-
Let me add a fact that might alter your opinion one way or another. Alex Cora is not victimized by the data analysis of others. He was hired in both Houston and Boston because of his in-depth knowledge of these analytics. He’s THE GUY for this kind of thing, and has been for a long time. It’s a big part of why they want to promote him up the ladder. If you don’t like analytics, Cora is not your savior. He’s your nemesis…
-
And the other two teams are ranked 21st and 23rd in spending. And the team ranked 22nd is 0.5 games out. That means an Orioles win coupled with a Yankee loss means that 50% of the division leaders are in the top ten in spending while the other 50% are in the bottom 10. So, yes, it’s probably a coincidence. If nothing else, it’s certainly far too precarious to be conclusive. And another interesting payroll fact, the team leading the AL Central in payroll - the Chicago White Sox. Also, the Sox decline appears to have started while they had the highest payroll in MLB…
-
After his first 12 games, Hamilton was looking pretty DFA-able. .553 OPS. Couldn’t catch or throw. I’m all about giving players a legitimate chance and not making snap judgments on small sample sizes. But with Hamilton, I wasn’t sure there was anything else to see. Yet the Sox kept him and it’s worked out so far…
-
Straw man argument. He was at 52 pitches and had retired 12 of 12 hitters…
