Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    52,004
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. It's very possible. OTOH, if you lose a 1B/DH to injury or suspension or whatever, he is practically free to give a tryout to.
  2. If you were an O's fan, you would not have sundaes...
  3. But they are concerned about the luxury tax. .
  4. They have a decent foundation of position players - Betts, Benintendi, Bradley, Devers, Vazquez - but beyond them, what else do they have that will still he here in 3 years? Price will be older than and very likely less effetive. ERod is nice to have and might be special someday. But when it comes to filling those other holes, they don't have much. Especially pitching...
  5. Hey!! That's Kevin's kid you're trashing
  6. I think the fans do a better job picking All Stars than the coaches and players do picking Gold Gloves..
  7. Typically feels like that ate from the other team's media deciDing they need all of the best rebuild options for their best player. While JD Martinez went for squat last year, I don't expect Machado to be foo cheap. But I also Don't think he is going to bankrupt anyone. Unless the acquiring team is as well in the farm add Boston. I suppose that is the one bright side to having a depleted farm; we have no untouchable prospects to worry about losing. ...
  8. Would that be Baltimore radio?
  9. A 30 year old pitcher with 57 MLB IP is the centerpiece for Machado? Not very likely.
  10. I consider that moving on to Plan B. Just because a move was unplanned or done earlier than expected doesn't make it necessarily "panic." Especially if it's easily reversible. I'd rather see the Sox gamble on promoting players rather than go out and sign another David Price or Pablo Sandoval. Those deals strike me as the panic moves, where the Sox do whatever they need to in order to fill a void, whether it's a good idea or not...
  11. Sort of like Aroldis Chapman?
  12. This is so true. Once Sale and Kimbrel go, the Sox are going to NEED to retain Betts and a few others if they want to be competitive. There is no real talent on the farm the Sox can count on to be anything more than minimum wage roster fillers.
  13. But would Baltimore say yes to anything else?
  14. So you would trade 5 years of Devers for 3 months of Machado and 3 months of a recovering Zach Britton? Britton has thrown all of ONE INNING this year. Are you certain he is the pitcher he was once? Also, there should be no overlap in willingness to demote a player and willingness to trade a player. The Twins just demoted Miguel Sano. Does that mean they're trading him?
  15. The Sox aren't getting Machado. Not with our farm system. What would we give up? Bryan Mata and Jalen Beeks? That's not going to pry him from Baltimore. In fact, the Sox are unlikely to acquire any big name this July. Maybe an infielder or a reliever, but don't expect a name bigger than Lowrie...
  16. What's the panic regarding calling up players you already have? That's just trying all your options before you do something drastic. I have no problem wIth any of the call ups you mentioned. To me, signing Rusney Castillo was more of a panic move than any of those call ups...
  17. Agreed. In fact, calling a player up from the minors should rarely be considered a "panic move." Internal moves are always first, since they can be undone if they don't work out. A true "panic move" would be unloading various pieces of the minor league system to hastily fill a need via trade. THEN you're stuck with the guy, regardless of how good he is. Look at Juan Soto in Washington. He is crushing in MLB despite being 19 and having all of 31 minor league at-bats above A-ball. Was that a panic move to call up him and his 1.000+ OPS in MLB? If the Sox demoted Devers today, and went with Holt/Nunez, would it still be a panic move? Devers would have given the Sox 125 games and an OPS of .755 over that stretch. That's not so bad, and beyond the year of service time, it didn't cost the Sox much to get it...
  18. The only real advantage Hanley gives them is that he would make minimum wage. They could sign him, and if a contender has a 1B/DH injury and Hanley manages to get hot, he might be a reasonable trade piece for them, and they could move him and his minimum wage butt for a reasonable farm piece while Boston kept footing the majority of the bill. If nothing else, he becomes a much better trade candidate than all their other expendable 1B/DH types.
  19. He certainly has not outplayed Holt. Nunez has an OPS of .564 since April 20. Holt has an OPS of .914 since April 17.
  20. Mookie has come up with 102 runners on base and driven in 20 of them, or 19.6%. That's an excellent percentage. RBI leader JD Martinez has come up with 176 runners on base and driven in 33 of them, or 18.75 %. (Most hitters run about 16-18%.) So yes, Mookie needs more people on base. But such is the way of the lead off hitter.
  21. .. which is probably why Hanley is waiting for some key 1B or DH to get injured before signing anywhere...
  22. Haniger is quietly entering the MVP race. Mike Leake and Wade LeBlanc are quietly becoming very reliable starting pitchers, especially after a very slow star from Leake.
  23. I think Rusney should have a future in MLB, but the Sox are not going to gamble on him this season given the potential penalties they would face from the luxury tax should they call him up. Next season is still in play for Castillo, but he will be another year older and runs the risk of declining past the point of usefulness. He is more likely to be nothing more than the highest paid player in the International League for a few more years. ..
  24. notin

    replay

    They do get reviews from the league office. But also bear in mind, a lot of what we think are the rules are solely umpire calls. For example, ask any amateur coach about what happens when a player making a taf drops the ball and he will tell you the runner is safe. That's not the rule. The rule is it becomes the umpires call if the runner is out or not. (Many umpires do use the guideline that the runner is safe when the ball is dropped during a tag, but the rule is that is it their call.)
  25. Or see if thre is an injury between now and then. Any deals made for slight upgrades between now and the deadline likely deplete the Sox limited trade resources unnecessarily...
×
×
  • Create New...