I’m on board with high leverage, but really clutch isn’t so simple to define.
For example, people are citing postseason stats. Are all postseason stats really clutch? We all saw the Sox beat Cleveland in back to back games by scores of 11-2 and 12-2. Were the hits that drove in runs 11 and 12 really all that clutch?
I can agree that late and close numbers and high leverage numbers are good, but they can’t be all there is. JD Drew hit a pretty clutch grand slam in the 2007 ALDS, but it was in the first inning. So clearly, not late.
The only truly clutch hitter I can think of as the one guy with situational super powers was Pat Tabler. Career OPS - .724. Career OPS with the bases loaded - 1.198. Considering he wasn’t really even a starter for most of his career and was used as a pinch hitter - often because of his track record with the bases loaded - he’s the only truly clutch player I can think of…