Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    52,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. So how about Cleveland gets Gilberto Jimenez, alleviating their 40-man roster crunch a bit while helping their farm system Cincinnati gets Andres Gimenez, giving them an actual starting SS Boston gets 5Gold favorite Lucas Sims to help out that bullpen Works per BTV...
  2. I'll take Tomase over Gerry Callahan or Tony Massarotti...
  3. That’s a universal baseball solution that can be applied to every team ever…
  4. Stroman is probably the best option for Boston in free agency, but that hardly makes him the best available option. It does make him one of the easier options, however…
  5. His former employer does have the Sox as very slight favorites…
  6. Not us. Blood is thicker than laundry detergent…
  7. I know!! Next thing you know, he’ll be talking about how indifferent he is about them! The nerve!!
  8. If they decided spending heavily in a year in which Sale was a potential non-factor, I can understand that. Especially if it was only to put it off for one year…
  9. At this point, it’s a safe bet Houston has several contingency plans in the event Lance McCullers gets hurt. What throws them off their game is if he actually stays healthy…
  10. And no one said “truthiness” before Stephen Colbert!
  11. And yet people will use it in front of “pure”. I consider them Satanists. Especially those P&G nutballs who decided their soap was 99 44/100 % pure. Pure means 100%!!! No wonder everyone used to think you were satanic. (Truth is, Proctor was satanic. Gamble just played along.)
  12. "Seldom" just means "infrequently." No one would ever argue with "very infrequently"...
  13. Well, in Florida it means something else. Especially if you're all wicked up...
  14. Once Sale was lost for the year and ERod went down, and Ryan Weber was bumped up to the role of #3 starter, the correct move would have been to deal Betts anyway...
  15. The word "very" is also grammatically incorrect for anyone from Boston. The proper diction to convey this particular meaning is "wicked"...
  16. He threw 8 IP in 4 games. Since he is off until at minimum Friday, I don't that workload was career-ending...
  17. They also lived and died with rookie pitchers. The only reason their rookie pitchers' records were 1-2 in the series as opposed to 1-3 was because they pulled Shane Baz before he could blow the entire lead in game two...
  18. And that was all made extremely evident in the ALDS with Tampa, where teams that got 5 IP from their starter went 3-0. Tampa's downfall was trying to get 25 IP from their bullpen in 3 games...
  19. There' a big difference between "post-season experience" and World Series rings. The entire Rays' lineup had post-season experience except for Wander Franco, and he did not exactly look like he felt intimidated at the plate. And they got much further with last year's team that had barely any post-season experience. What the Rays did have was a team that a little too dependent on it's bullpen. Shane McClanahan in game one was their only starter to go beyond 2 innings (and did so in the only game they won). And after that, the Sox saw the same parade of relievers and maybe got a little too used to them...
  20. Betts was an all time great, but one year of any player making $25mill rarely gets back superstar talent. Bloom did well in that trade. not great, but well...
  21. Sawamura lead the Sox in BB/9 and HR/9 for all pitchers with more than 50 IP. And I don’t mean he lead them in a good way…
  22. Interesting. Not so sure Mata, who is probably out until June or so, and even then hassome minor league work to do, is tht much of a trade entivement. But Oakland might be interested. The one caveat is that if Oakland is able to offer arbitration with any players I listed, I would say Pinder is the most likely, followed by Bassitt...
  23. The starting options via free agency strike me as less than tantalizing. Scherzer is obviously the king, but is 37. There are a few other good ones that I have opinions on both ways like Stroman and Gausman, but how many years should the Sox commit to for either of these guys? The reliever market, on the other hand, at the very least will require fewer years of commitment. The trade market is probably one of the more likely options. But who will be the sox trade bait to get a good starter or reliever? I think Jarren Duran is probably high on the list, simply because it's very possible there is no real role for him in Boston even if Schwarber does not come back. If the Sox keep Kike in CF, then Duran does become expendable. And that he makes no money means he is not priced out of any team's budget. When it comes to adding a starter, the first place the Sox need to look is Oakland, who is going to have a boatload of arbitration cases and will probably look to move a few. Their arbitration-eligible players include Frankie Montas, Sean Manaea, and Chris Bassitt just from the rotation. Also, they will have to deal with closer Lou Trivino, 3B Matt Chapman, 1B Matt Olson, RF Ramon Laureano, and Util Chad Pinder. No way they even try to sign them all. There is a reason they went all in on Starling Marte at the deadline; they knew this team was breaking up. That Marte is leaving and Laureano is on the block does potentially mean that Jarren Duran should certainly be a player who garners some interest...
×
×
  • Create New...