Devers has had a ton of big and clutch hits over his career. Memories are short, for some.
He has not been "clutch," so far this year, but even some of his solo shots have tied game, or got us within striking range. They were not all useless.
Here are the large sample size numbers: career 3,765 PAs for the 27 year old, who has just reached prime:
.855 Career overall OPS (.842 home/.892 away shows that Fenway has not helped him.)
.870 Men on Base (better than overall) .850 bases loaded (about the same)
.905 RISP (better than overall)
.892 RISP w 2 outs (better than overall)
.876 High Leverage (Better than overall) .795 Low Leverage
Can we stop with the "not clutch" talk? Is someone really being judge by a 34 game sample size? Is someone really being judged more harshly, because we didn't keep Betts, 4 years ago?
It looks like the answer is yes, for some. Not me.
Sure, I wish we kept Betts. I suggested we offer him $400M/14, if that's what it took. Sure, I wish we extended Bogey way before that last season with us. Sure, I wanted us to lock up Devers "forevers," and I'm still glad we did.
We'd be much worse off without him, and we all know we could not have counted on JH to spend his money on others.