Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    107,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    144

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I spelled it out, and you know exactly what my position was and always has been. It was "inevitable," when you believe JH will not spend and spend year in and year out. He never did before, and I did not expect he'd start in 2019. We can cry all day long, "But JH CAN SPEND MORE!" That does not make it inevitable he will. JH has cut spending every 2-3 years, over his whole era. I felt it was inevitable, he would again, and that we'd pay the price. You and others claimed, among other ideas, that we could build the farm quickly, that JH would just keep raising the budget from an already 1 ranked budget, or that we still had a strong enough core to keep the window going for 3-4 more years. The farm had nothing from Devers to Houck. The rules were changed to make winning and spending teams have a harder time stocking the farm. Stiff penalties were added to big spenders, and thinking JH was going to pay those taxes was la-la land.
  2. As much as I rant about adding a solid SP'er, I agree that Tanner Scott should be target #1.
  3. Yes, he did, but over the 4 years, he did not spend what DD did. He spent less in 2013 than Theo did in 2010 to 2011. (That's not counting inflation.) Ben did increase spending after 2013, and quite significantly, so your point is solid. The team was at about $165M, the two years before Ben, and he dipped to $154M in '13 before ending at $184M. From start to finish, he went from $168M (Theo in 2011) to $184M- up $1`6M DD went to $197M yr 1 & 2, then 1, $234K in 2018 (1 rank) and $236M in '19. His total add was $$52M in 4 yrs. Bloom from $236M to $181M or -$55M. Brez down $10M in 1 year.
  4. The sham, here, is you inventing we thought.
  5. Of course JH could have become what the Dodgers and Mets are, today. Nobody ever said there HAD TO BE A CLIFF, or that it was inevitable. We knew JH was not going to go from the #1 spending team (2019) to much greater heights to keep all the stars or replace them in kind.
  6. Good article. We certainly need a LH's RP'er, and I'll go farther and say the need for a RHB is overblown. I'd like one, yes, but it's not as high a priority as a LH's RP, a solid SP and another solid RP'er or three. Just get a serviceable RHB catcher, and count of Story, Campbell and Ref to do the rest. Also, Anthony is no platoon player. He hits lefties, very well.
  7. If the pen is not significantly improved, the sham continues.
  8. Agree. 8 teams is pushing it, for me.
  9. Gotta say that list is not something to moan and groan about, right? It turned out rather amazingly, how few did real well. I know the argument that he barely knew the ones decided to keep, except maybe Devers & Beni, but facts are facts. He kept the best and traded almost all the higher/highest stock ones. Also, the returns of Sale, Kimbrel, Nate and Pearce far outweighed the misses like Thornburg, C Smith and maybe PomPom. He knew how to run a high budget team. That 2018 team was a juggernaut. 2016, 2017 and 2019 were all really good, on paper.
  10. Exactly. The best ones were Dubon and Beeks- not the ones we thought, like Moncada, Kopech, Espinoza and others.
  11. I'm not saying DD was bad- just the opposite. I won't say I wish he stayed, because he'd have had a rough time with JH's budget's, too. Probably couldn't have done any worse.
  12. I'm terrible with knowing how good our pitching prospects will turn out. I hardly ever see them live, and go mostly by scouting reports and stats, so that's one reason. I know we lack any great hopes, except maybe Perales, but I think we might have a few more Houck's, Bello's or Crawford's up our sleaves.
  13. Mayer, Abreu, Wong, Crawford & Wikelman for Ober (3 arbs), Ryan (3 arbs) and Jeffers (1 arb)
  14. Kimbrel was really his first move (NOV '15) followed by Chris Young and Price in early DEC. That Price signing shocked the hell out of me, and others. Midseason '16: traded Rijo & Wilkerson for Aaron Hill and traded Basabe & Almonte for Brad Ziegler, then Espinoza for Pomeranz. At the deadline, Pat Light for Fernando Abad. 2nd offseason (Fall '16-Spring '17): Dubon, Shaw & Pennington for Thornburg and the big shocker: 4 players for Chris Sale. Selected Josh Rutledge Rule 5. Singed Mitch Moreland. Traded Buch for Josh Tobias. Paid cash for Hector Velazquez. 2017 midseason: Doug Fister off waivers. Traded Longhi, I Diaz & S Espinal for IFA bonus pool space. Traded Shaun Anderson & G Santos for Nunez and then 3 prospects for Addison Reed. 3rd offseason ('17-'18): Re-signed Moreland & Nunez. Signed JD Martinez. Midseason: Santiago Espinal for Steve Pearce, then Beeks for Nate. Also, Buttrey & Jerez for Kinsler 4th off season and his last: Quiroz for Colten Brewer (effectively Kimbrel & Kelly's replacement) Extended Sale & Bogaerts. Midseason: Cash for Andrew Cashner
  15. Even if they went to 7 game series in each round, there is no need to cut back that much, and they'd never give up that amount of money over a concept. Going to 154 would just return to the old days, so it would not be that extreme, but my guess is they will stay at 162, while still expanding the playoffs.
  16. I do think we might match up with MN, if they are looking to trade Lopez or some of their soon-to-be arb pitchers. I'd like to see us get Jeffers, their RHB catcher with 1 year of control left. He also averages about 28 HRs per 650 PAs. Get it done!
  17. I get that Rafaela played 14 more innings at SS than OF, but his 634 OF innings was 140 more than Ref and 633 more than Yoshida. I like the grades given. I'd have made some minor adjustments: A+ Duran A- Abreu B+ O'Neill and Ref C Rafaela INC Yoshida
  18. I don't trust what any of these guys say. They could go to 14, soon, then 16, if and when they expand to 32.
  19. True but more than half get in. (I'm not for the idea.)
  20. While I do think 154 games is enough to weed out lucky teams, I agree. The long season is for a reason. Asking teams to win short series after short series adds back in the luck factor, or as some call it "a crapshoot." Baseball is not like basketball and football. The playoffs should not be like theirs.
  21. Great point and list. Much had nothing to do with a radical cut in winter spending. While the payroll went up, as Maz keeps pointing out, much was due to arb raises and the extensions that just kept the status quo. There was basically no new spending after 2018, and any new spending in 2020 and 2021 never replaced what was lost, in terms of expiring contracts or players traded away (Betts, Price, Beni...) I will say, I do not think the nate extension was bad, but it wasn't as good as the JD signing or Kimbrell & Sale trade. The Bogey extension was great, despite the opt-out. I doubt we get him for $20M a year w/o that. We can say he should have worked to get a non opt out with Bogey and a Betts extension, but that is really speculating on things with too many moving parts.
  22. Let's get their catcher back.
  23. Kinsler did solidify the 2B defense, as Nunez looked pretty bad out there. There were also guys like Brasier, who did very well under DD.
×
×
  • Create New...