Jump to content
Our MLB mock draft board has updated! Who do we have the Red Sox taking with the 20th pick? ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,178

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    127

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    LOL. He's in Nebraska.
  2. moonslav59
    It was nice seeing you be wrong, tonight. Maybe this is the start to something! LOL I'm not sure the word "flops" fits, as that implies we had good teams that underperformed. Maybe our management team are flops & misers, but the teams have largely played up to expectations.
  3. moonslav59
    What a game baseball is, huh? We do still have a nice team. I get the point about the high cost of SP'ers, but not finding some cheap platoon bat for 1B is a real headscratcher. Nothing to do with anatomy.
  4. moonslav59
    Sox now 4 down to TOR and the ALE lead. 1/2 behind NYY SEA playing TEX means one loses
  5. moonslav59
    ...and after a night like last night!
  6. moonslav59
    Isn't baseball such a wonderful game?
  7. moonslav59
    No deadline balls, but Bloom never made a trade like Crochet (or Sale.)
  8. moonslav59
    Hard to know how teams value Campbell.
  9. moonslav59
    Dham at .500 might still be better than Grissom, due to his D and running skills.
  10. moonslav59
    It does suck, now. The deal was more about the long run, so I try to give the GM some slack. There were reasons, but they all ring hollow, now.
  11. moonslav59
    Yes, w HOU announcers.
  12. moonslav59
    Maybe in FEB or a Rafaela plus deal.
  13. moonslav59
    Anthony is the real deal.
  14. moonslav59
    Huge play!
  15. moonslav59
    I've given similar stats several times, before. Toto's nice run is over. It's time to call Campbell up for a chance at 1B. Too bad he's not the right hand to platoon with Romy, but we can use Romy at 2B, anyway.
  16. moonslav59
    Why do you keep saying Toro is doing better than Devers. He's doing way worse since the trade, since opening day and over his career. That's not to say it wasn't the right thing to trade Devers- it was, but why misrepresent how well Toro is doing, when he has sucked for nearly 2 months now and was a .638 batter before the year began. The guy filled in well for Casas for a nice stretch. The stretch of sucking is way longer, now. .538 first 8 games. 1.102 next 16 games .587 last 39 games (not counting 0-3 tonight)
  17. moonslav59
    Woo won 2, today. JH Garcia his a granny as Sandlin pitched very well. Kelly, too. Garcia had 2 hits in the other win. Harrison allowed 10 H+BB in 5 IP, but he only allowed 2 runs. Rogers pitched very well in the 2-1 loss by POR. Futrell went 5IP allowing just 1BB & 1 hit.
  18. moonslav59
    Criswell did very well as a SP'er for the Sox, last year. We started 9 other pitchers before him, this year. It would have been 10 had Sandoval been ready.
  19. moonslav59
    And your guy, Toro, keeps killing rallies.
  20. moonslav59
    "Slightly above average." Talk about rewriting history.
  21. moonslav59
    Bernardino has had some long stretches of good pitching, but he's been inconsistent. Murphy seems about the same as Bernie, to me. I'm still not sure why a LH RP'er was so high on our deadline wish list.
  22. moonslav59
    I said the same thing, when it happened. He showed his hand. It wasn't about being "asked to play every position," it was about sticking it to his boss- a boss that was not the one who promised he'd play 3B forvers.
  23. moonslav59
    I agreed that posting Devers numbers is fair game. (Just don't say Toro has done better.) I agree the trade was the right thing to do, but I would not use small sample sizes to make it look like Devers sucks. (I'm fine that others post those numbers.) I think Devers will hit well, again, and it will still be the right thing to do.
  24. moonslav59
    They seem to think lying over and over again to their customers will never catch up to them. So far, it seems to have worked. "Full throttle" "Buyers" Once again, we're back to thinking of 2026 and beyond based on a fuzzy hope, we will swing the pendulum far enough to the hear and now to be serious contender. The thing is, we don't have to spend over the tax line or empty the farm. A healthy balance can be maintained, while we win, now. We just keep choosing to put it off another year, while we stockpile 18 OF'er & DH types. (Hyperbole alert.)
  25. moonslav59
    One package included a ML OF'er, and likely not Tolle. I'd probably have preferred that offer. I wonder if Campbell was offered or asked for. We heard "no even close," so what was that about? Would Campbell, Garcia, Arias and Early have been enough?
×
×
  • Create New...