Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    102,918

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    127

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    His D was what was holding him back, and he's made a few errors already, but the kid has some range.
  2. moonslav59
    40HR Dozier or 25 HR Dozier. I think your idea has merit. 25-30 HRs is better than Moreland's 15-18, but at what cost?
  3. moonslav59
    When you have an almost 100% DH in Papi, it did help having extra versatility, but I always thought it was over-rated. He's never been a real plus defender at any position, and defense is usually what you want from your subs. His .700+ OPS might be slightly better than most IF subs, but it was never good enough to make up for the mediocre, at best, defense.
  4. moonslav59
    That time was long ago.
  5. moonslav59
    How Soon Is Now?
  6. moonslav59
    I doubt Lin continues at .739, but he can't do much worse than .537. Neither should play much anyways.
  7. moonslav59
    I thought of him minutes after posting my response. Who-da-thunk-it?
  8. moonslav59
    We keep waiting for Betts and Bogey to catch fire. It's been a long wait. I know JF will never do it, but maybe we need to open with... 1) Nunez 2) Beni 3) Devers
  9. moonslav59
    Just finished watching tonight's game. I know we have no real clean-up hitter, but to see Moreland back in the 4 hole was disappointing. Will Devers be in the 4 slot soon?
  10. moonslav59
    Thanks. We will have a 4th OF'er slot open next year, but my guess is JF's love child, Holt, has the inside edge on that opening. We may just let Brentz become a FA, but I don't see how it would hurt to DFA Selsky and add Brentz to the 40 man roster. Bring BB up in September and take a long look at him in ST'ing. Maybe we can even trade him, if we can't find room on the 25 man roster. We won't get much in trade.
  11. moonslav59
    I don't know about his options. My guess is, if we add him to the 40 man roster, he may become a rule 5 player.
  12. moonslav59
    Yes, I doubt Betts takes a home discount extension, but they do offer security against injury or serious decline before reaching free agency. What an extension can do, is provide that security and some more up-front money, so players and their families can enjoy the MEGA rich life earlier. Instead of giving Betts $50M/3 + $110M/3 ($160M/6 total), you structure it something like this: $20M, $22M, $24M, $28M, $32M, $34M or $66M/3 + $94M/3 The player can invest the early money and end up making more than a back-ended contract worth less overall money.
  13. moonslav59
    Swihart did catch a significant amount of time in the Sox system. He caught over 335 games on the farm and got 78 games at the big league level. That's not a whole lot, but I got the feeling Sox brass did not like his progression in these hard-to-measure areas.
  14. moonslav59
    Updated Sox OPS leaders (PAs noted if under 215) 1.054 Nunez (67) .977 Devers (64) .806 Beni .804 Betts .784 Pedey DL .775 Travis (50) .773 HRam .757 JBJ .747 Moreland .744 Young .739 Lin .726 Bogey .700 Vaz .672 Leon .629 Hernandez DL (60) .622 Pablo (108) .576 Marrero (166) .558 Rutledge (118) .537 Holt (83)
  15. moonslav59
    It's weird how 3 people get 3 very different take-aways from that one plate appearance. No way am I saying mine is right, but I just didn't like the vibe HRam was sending to the rookie coming up.
  16. moonslav59
    Remember, any extension now would include 3 arb years, where Betts might make $45-50M, so if you are talking $180M/6, you're really giving him an extension of about $130M/3 or about $43M a year x 3.
  17. moonslav59
    You mean he accidentally did something right this year?
  18. moonslav59
    At one point the word was HRam was going to DH the rest of the year. That's how bad his injury looked at one time.
  19. moonslav59
    As great as our pen has been, other than Kimbrel, who can we really trust?
  20. moonslav59
    He is NOT on the 40 man roster right now. If we add him, he won't become a minor league FA. (I got that wrong before.) He's not rule 5 eligible, so that the 25 man roster thing you are talking about does not apply. He's been in our system since 2010. From soxprospects.com... The following players will become minor league free agents in November 2017 unless they are added to the 40-man roster or re-signed. Jeremy Barfield, Brian Bogusevic, Bryce Brentz, Dan Butler, Ryan Court, Jacob Dahlstrand, Matt Dominguez, Conrad Gregor, Shawn Haviland, Williams Jerez, Kyle Kendrick, Deiner Lopez, Heiker Meneses, Edgar Olmos, Mike Olt, Mitchell Osnowitz, Tim Roberson, Jose Sermo, Aneury Tavarez, Herny Urrutia, Elih Villaneuva, Marcus Walden, Jordan Weems
  21. moonslav59
    I read it differently, but you could be right.
  22. moonslav59
    I got the sense from watching HRam's body language and facial expressions, he was sending a message like, "You are a God, Chapman. There's no possible way anybody in the world can hit you!" I actually thought about how his behavior might make poor Devers feel coming up to face the HRam- anointed God. Nope, the kid in his "happy bubble" swung wildly once, then he calmly cranked a long HR off a 103 mph fastball. This kid is really making a big difference. He single-handedly (Okay, he had help from Sale) turned the joyful Yankee dugout into a funeral procession, and all he did was tie the game!
  23. moonslav59
    Probably every team could show a similar dispariity, but what are the numbers of these two groups of Sox players? Sale, Pom, Kimbrel & Kelly vs The rest
  24. moonslav59
    Sale, Pom and a hodge-podge pen that somehow has done a great job.
  25. moonslav59
    I'm usually against large and long contracts. The vast majority are failures or near failures, but extending Betts 7 years beyond the 3 he already has, at his age, is a good gamble. Almost all his years would fall within prime or very near prime. That's what's different about extending vs signing a 30 year old FA to 6-7 years.
×
×
  • Create New...