Me, too. I'm not projecting better than 108 wins, but with so many of our players on the rise towards prime or in the meat of their prime, I think we could win 105 games and still be a better team than the 2018 team (or at least the same).
Many great hitters had high K rates. He walks enough for it to not be a major issue.
Sox K% last year
27.5% Swihart
26.0% Leon
25.6% JBJ
24.7% Devers
22.5% JD
22.2% Moreland
19.9% Holt
How about hard hit%?
44.9% JD
44.5% Betts
41.1% JBJ
37.9% Bogey
34.9% Moreland
34.4% Devers
33.3% Pearce
29.6% Swihart
29.2% Holt
28.0% Beni
27.5% Vaz
27.2% Nunez
26.4% Leon
He's so damn young, I'm not sure why only the K rate should matter.
He's a free swinger. He reminds me of Vlad Guerrero or Adrian Beltre at the plate.
I can't find a link to support my point, but I thought I read it somewhere, and Vaz always looks to the dug out for a long time between pitches.
I'm not 100% positive.
Exactly!
"Shown little?" The guy has been a Yankee killer.
He has 31 HRs and 96 RBIs in his very first 730 PAs in MLB at a super young age playing against pitchers many years older than him.
Not many good to great players started out worse than this. BR lists players with similar batting numbers at age 21- here are a few of them:
Ron Santo
Juan Gonzalez
Cal Ripken
Willie Mays
Jose Canseco
Larry Parish
Of course, Devers could underachieve or flame out, but I see more signs he busts out and becomes a great hitter.
Click the link, schroll down to Advanced. At the bottom is Steamers 2019 projection of an .805 OPS.
https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=17350&position=3B
Yes, but the 100 best doctors could say he is 100% healed, and he could experience the same injury or a new (serious) one this season.
(knock on wood.)
We all want Sale back.
Possible budget constraints is the only thing that may make it a tough choice.
I'd like to extend him, now, but waiting to see how his health looks makes sense, too. However, if he has a great season with 200+ IP, his price tag should go up.
It's about resetting or not.
If the plan is not to reset in the next 2 years, then yes, go for Bogey and Sale first and Betts next year.
If we are looking to reset after 2019 or 2020, then signing Bogey AND Sale would greatly lessen the chances we can keep Betts.
Note: just because we are looking extend Bogey and Sale, we may be thinking if one accepts, we'd not up the offer to the other in hopes of resetting and keeping Betts after 2020.
Yes, as is the case for most younger players moving towards prime. (999 PAs by Vaz and 672 by Devers)
If you really are expecting .731 from Devers and .540 from Vaz, then I can't make any more points, but even that would be better than what their replacements gave us last year.
I'm thinking .800 from Devers and .670 from Vaz is not a stretch.
Steamer projects:
.805 Devers (.805 THE BAT and .787 ATC)
.672 Vaz (.659 THE BAT & .637 ATC)
These numbers blow Nunez, Leon and Swihart out of the water.
The 15 minor league players get next to nothing. The pre-arb MLB players make about $600-$800K each.
For 2019 & 2020 our pre-arb MLB players might be...
Devers
Johnson
Velazquez
Brasier
Lin
Poyner
Lakins
Feltman
For just 2019
Beni
That's 9 for 2019, plus we could add Chavis, Shawaryn, Dalbec or others.
We'd basically have to fill these roles:
Porcello (#3 starter)- Wright/Johnson/Velazquez?
1B (Pearce/Moreland)- Chavis/Dalbec (Devers from 3B)?
Utility (Holt/Nunez)- Swihart, Lin, Chatham, Chavis, Dalbec?
Maybe we need 3-4 decent free agents.
Yes, but since we reset in 2017 and 2018, there will be an increase in 2019 and 2020- the two years we are talking about with Sale, Bogey and Betts, among others, coming due for their big paydays.
2018: 20%
2019: 30%
2020: 50%
That's just for going over the first line. Keeping everyone would certainly put us over the $20M line and likely the $40M line, too.
You are assuming they will repeat their 2018 numbers in 2019. This is not a valid way to project future output, but if you want to go by that....
.731 Devers
.677 Nunez
.540 Vaz
.511 Leon
While the gain might look slight here, I don't think I'm being a homer to believe they can at least give us their career norms (or better) in 2019:
.760 Devers
.632 Vaz
Both would be a significant improvement over their 2018 replacements' numbers.
$33M Betts
$32M Sale
$31M Price
$24M Bogey
$23M JD
$14M Pedey
$158M for 6 players + $15M player benefits= $173M with 34 more guys to pay.
It won't be $300M, but we'd have to be over the max line to keep the rest of the roster good enough to compete (replace Porcello, find a 1Bman, pay for arb raises to JBJ, ERod, Barnes...)
We had a 5 year window (2015-2019): that's pretty darn long! Maybe we can eek out 2020 by keeping Bogey and Sale, but if we go to reset after 2020- bye bye Betts.
I filled in the blanks...
SP Sale, Price, E Rod, Eovaldi, Wright/Johnson/Velazquez
BP Barnes, Brasier, Hembree, Workman, Poyner, Lakins, Feltman
CF Beni
RF Betts
LF JD
SS Xander
1B Devers
2B Dustin
1B Chavis
3B Dalbec
C Vazquez
I can't see how we can get under the first luxury tax line with Sale, Bogey, Betts, JD and Price.
Where did I go wrong?
2020
Trade JBJ & Vaz for a low cost 5th starter.
Do not resign FAs to be Porcello, Nunez, Holt and Thornburg
33 Sale
31 Price
~28M Betts (last arb)
~23M Bogey (re-sign)
22 JDM
17 Eovaldi
14 Pedey
$168M in 7 players
~7 ERod (3rd of 4 arbs)
~4 Beni (1st of 3)
~3 Barnes (2 of 3)
~2 Hembree (2 of 3)
~2 Wright (3rd of 3)
~2 Leon (4th of 4)
~2 Swihart (2 of 4)
add $22M
add $15M player benefits
$205M Total for 14 players under contract and projected arbs.
The 2020 luxury tax line is $208M.
We can argue about going or not going over the first line next year, but my question was how can we keep all these guys AND stay under.