Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Nobody is expecting Dalbec to come any where near JD on offense, and since he's one of our better defensive players, he might be the last choice at DH. Chavis & Ockimey may try and fill that roll (not like JD) after 2020. I can see the point in trading Dalbec, who is blocked at his most value fulfilling position, but we really need a 1Bman next year.
  2. My guess is this will be the plan. I do think the trade or non tender JBJ to stay under the tax line. If we playw ell, we may pick up some players at the deadline and maybe even go over the tax line in an attempt to win in 2020. If we don't, we'll trade Betts and maybe more at the deadline.
  3. LMAO- literally!
  4. For a lawyer, you really misinterpret a lot. I have said over and over, I have no position on this debate, except that I think it's all conjecture and maybe pointless. There's no way we'll ever know what the tiny bit of extra rest for most not all of our players unleashed. For all we know, we might have done worse or seen more injuries had we played them more often. Pointing out factual mistakes in your argument happens so often, because you make more mistakes than others. Using terms like "the entire team" may just be hyperbole or "alternative facts," but it's not true.
  5. I didn't claim this case was an example of false equivalency. I merely pointed out the nature of such happenings and implied this might be such a case.
  6. 1) It wasn't the entire team. 4 of our top 9 batters had more ABs this year than last. 2) A couple starters had more IP. 3) So, you agree with the NESN clowns, but that doesn't make it anything more than conjecture.
  7. It's conjecture to link a tiny bit of extra rest to poor April results. It's conjecture to to think restgate had nothing to do with our poor April results.
  8. That often happens with false equivalencies.
  9. It appears DD & Henry were not.
  10. Beni in CF is an awful idea, even if just for a 1 year bridge to 2021. Beni in LF is bad enough (defensively).
  11. Couple this with the huge drop off from international FA signings, and we can see why our farm is ranked 30th.
  12. Plus, JBJ was a comp pick. We won't be getting those anymore. Other comp picks (Imagine what our teams would be like without these guys): Ellsbury Buchholz Lowrie D Bard Hagadone (part of VMart trade) Ranaudo Workman Barnes Swihart JBJ Johnson Light (traded for Abad) Kopech (part of Sale trade) Kopech was our last comp pick way back in 2014.
  13. This looks realistic. I might go a step further by trading JD for the best prospects or young ML talent I can find, even if I pay part of just his 2020 salary. (He will likely opt out after 2020, unless he gets hurt or falls off a cliff.) I'd hope we go back to spending in 2021, including making a solid offer to Betts. No FA returning. No JBJ or JD. Sign only FAs that look like they can help for the long run at a reasonable cost or 1 year bridge players to fill some gaps and keep us respectable for 2020. SP: Sale, ERod, Price, Eovaldi, D Hernandez, Chacin (Wright/Johnson/Velazquez/Weber/Shawaryn) RP: __FA__, Workman, Barnes, Hembree, Taylor, Walden (Failed SP'er/Brasier/Houck/Brewer/Lakins/Poyner/Reyes/Feltman/Bazardo) 1. Betts RF 2. Beni LF 3. Bogey SS 4. Devers 3B 5. Chavis 2B 6. Dalbec/Ockimey or Travis 1B/DH 7. Ockimey/ Travis 1B/DH or Chatham/Lin 2B 8. Vaz C 9. __FA__ CF
  14. I'm not ready to anoint Duran as our FT CF'er next year, but if we are resetting next year, it might be an option. I'd prefer to use the little budget space we might have with no JBJ on the roster to sign a cheap but great defensive CF'er. Maybe Travis, Duran or Lin can be our OF depth. I don't want JD in the OF, either, unless we are at a NL park.
  15. I've suggested Dalbec at 1B. I used to suggest him at 3B and Devers at 1B, but RD has stepped up his defense to the point where messing with him would be a mistake. I'm fine with giving Dalbec a chance at 1B, since 1B is wide open, however, notin makes a valid point. His defense at 3B would be wasted at 1B, and that value may be worth more to another team than ours. Assuming we get equal value back in trade, the theory of trading him to a team in need of a 3Bman for an equal value prospect that plays a position we need makes sense.
  16. He's a pure hitter. He's always been that. I wouldn't mess with a thing. Sometimes a great line-up needs a guy that doesn't fit the mold of the other hitters- like Adrian Beltre did way back when.
  17. Tiny sample size. He had those numbers early in the year,m and I heard the same thing. Some even wanted to demote him. Don't read too much into simple slumps.
  18. Would you want him back?
  19. Ben is available, isn't he?
  20. I agree. I was just wondering who was doing the thinking. Looks like my suggestion that we will reset after 2020 or 2021 is looking correct.
  21. Ask yourself why mess with success?
  22. You could trade Dalbec for a good young 1Bman.
  23. If that's what they said (doubtful) and this has nothing to do with my response about restgate.
  24. It's crazy to think we won't have a reset. We have some role players on the farm but nothing that will give us a boost.
  25. Who are the "thinking Sox?" Henry? We have no GM. I'm hoping that if we do decide to trade Betts this winter, we make a push at signing him after 2020. If we trade Betts, we might as well trade JBJ, and maybe even ERod, Workman and Barnes. Build up the farm. Keep a core of Bogey, Devers, Beni, Vaz and out of necessity, Sale, Price and E-o. Maybe look to spend again for 2021, but only players that look to have long term impact, or waiting until 2022 might also make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...