Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Yes, because it is not falling as fast as normal balls do.
  2. Also, Anibal Sanchez, Frankie Montas and Jalen Beeks.
  3. Replacing Wright with Chacin makes sense, especially if Wright will cost over $2-3M.
  4. Our possible 26 man roster opening day 2020: 6 SP: Sale, ERod, Price, Eovaldi, Wright, Johnson (out of options) 7 RP: _FA__, Workman, Barnes, Taylor, Walden, DHernandez, Hembree 2 C: Vaz & Centeno (Leon if back at near min) 2 1B: Dalbec & Ockimey (or Travis from LF) 2 2B: Chavis & Marco (or Lin/Chatham) 1 3B: Devers 1 SS: Bogey 2 LF: Beni & Travis (or Duran) 1 CF: __FA__ 1 RF: Betts 1 DH: JD Other 14 on 40 man roster: Chacin, Velazquez, Reyes, Weber, Houck, Shawaryn Brasier, Brewer, Lakins, Poyner, Kelley Lin, Chatham, Sturgeon or Gorkys
  5. I've always lobbied for the 26 man roster, but I hope it doesn't lead to one more pitching change per game. I like the Sept limit of 28. That will avoid the 10 RP'er per game fiascoes.
  6. I think, if we lose JBJ's salary, we'll have about $5-7M to spend and stay under the first tax line. That could get us a cheap defensive CF'er and a cheap RP'er. The rest is filled in house.
  7. Or, you like Marco and Lin more than I do. I'm not high on Travis, but I do think Ockimey can work as a strict platoon 1B/DH type. He has killed RHPs for years: .898 in 2019 AAA .968 in 2018 AA .844 in 2017 A+ If Chavis (.742 v LHPs_ or Travis (.711 v LHPs) can do better vs lefties, we might be okay on offense at 1B. 2B looks much better defensively, if Marco and Lin play more than Chavis.
  8. I'm thinking it's about even: 1B: Chavis, Travis, Dalbec, Ockimey 2B: Chavis, Marco, Lin, Chatham (Dalbec?)
  9. Sox managers have been using some form of extra rest or scheduled rest days off for a long time. One could argue it sucks, but one could argue it has worked (4 rings). It's all conjecture. As for Remy and Eck being "clowns," I like Eck most of the time, but he certainly has some weird positions and has made clownish statements, like the "...rising fastball..." Remy is a cool guy, but to me, he's lost it and become a cult of himself. I think he tries to be funny, too much. That's why I referenced "clown" with him. They both make some great insights, and calling them "clowns" instead of saying they act like clowns, at times, was wrong.
  10. Nobody is expecting Dalbec to come any where near JD on offense, and since he's one of our better defensive players, he might be the last choice at DH. Chavis & Ockimey may try and fill that roll (not like JD) after 2020. I can see the point in trading Dalbec, who is blocked at his most value fulfilling position, but we really need a 1Bman next year.
  11. My guess is this will be the plan. I do think the trade or non tender JBJ to stay under the tax line. If we playw ell, we may pick up some players at the deadline and maybe even go over the tax line in an attempt to win in 2020. If we don't, we'll trade Betts and maybe more at the deadline.
  12. LMAO- literally!
  13. For a lawyer, you really misinterpret a lot. I have said over and over, I have no position on this debate, except that I think it's all conjecture and maybe pointless. There's no way we'll ever know what the tiny bit of extra rest for most not all of our players unleashed. For all we know, we might have done worse or seen more injuries had we played them more often. Pointing out factual mistakes in your argument happens so often, because you make more mistakes than others. Using terms like "the entire team" may just be hyperbole or "alternative facts," but it's not true.
  14. I didn't claim this case was an example of false equivalency. I merely pointed out the nature of such happenings and implied this might be such a case.
  15. 1) It wasn't the entire team. 4 of our top 9 batters had more ABs this year than last. 2) A couple starters had more IP. 3) So, you agree with the NESN clowns, but that doesn't make it anything more than conjecture.
  16. It's conjecture to link a tiny bit of extra rest to poor April results. It's conjecture to to think restgate had nothing to do with our poor April results.
  17. That often happens with false equivalencies.
  18. It appears DD & Henry were not.
  19. Beni in CF is an awful idea, even if just for a 1 year bridge to 2021. Beni in LF is bad enough (defensively).
  20. Couple this with the huge drop off from international FA signings, and we can see why our farm is ranked 30th.
  21. Plus, JBJ was a comp pick. We won't be getting those anymore. Other comp picks (Imagine what our teams would be like without these guys): Ellsbury Buchholz Lowrie D Bard Hagadone (part of VMart trade) Ranaudo Workman Barnes Swihart JBJ Johnson Light (traded for Abad) Kopech (part of Sale trade) Kopech was our last comp pick way back in 2014.
  22. This looks realistic. I might go a step further by trading JD for the best prospects or young ML talent I can find, even if I pay part of just his 2020 salary. (He will likely opt out after 2020, unless he gets hurt or falls off a cliff.) I'd hope we go back to spending in 2021, including making a solid offer to Betts. No FA returning. No JBJ or JD. Sign only FAs that look like they can help for the long run at a reasonable cost or 1 year bridge players to fill some gaps and keep us respectable for 2020. SP: Sale, ERod, Price, Eovaldi, D Hernandez, Chacin (Wright/Johnson/Velazquez/Weber/Shawaryn) RP: __FA__, Workman, Barnes, Hembree, Taylor, Walden (Failed SP'er/Brasier/Houck/Brewer/Lakins/Poyner/Reyes/Feltman/Bazardo) 1. Betts RF 2. Beni LF 3. Bogey SS 4. Devers 3B 5. Chavis 2B 6. Dalbec/Ockimey or Travis 1B/DH 7. Ockimey/ Travis 1B/DH or Chatham/Lin 2B 8. Vaz C 9. __FA__ CF
  23. I'm not ready to anoint Duran as our FT CF'er next year, but if we are resetting next year, it might be an option. I'd prefer to use the little budget space we might have with no JBJ on the roster to sign a cheap but great defensive CF'er. Maybe Travis, Duran or Lin can be our OF depth. I don't want JD in the OF, either, unless we are at a NL park.
  24. I've suggested Dalbec at 1B. I used to suggest him at 3B and Devers at 1B, but RD has stepped up his defense to the point where messing with him would be a mistake. I'm fine with giving Dalbec a chance at 1B, since 1B is wide open, however, notin makes a valid point. His defense at 3B would be wasted at 1B, and that value may be worth more to another team than ours. Assuming we get equal value back in trade, the theory of trading him to a team in need of a 3Bman for an equal value prospect that plays a position we need makes sense.
  25. He's a pure hitter. He's always been that. I wouldn't mess with a thing. Sometimes a great line-up needs a guy that doesn't fit the mold of the other hitters- like Adrian Beltre did way back when.
×
×
  • Create New...