I guess it's a matter of choice, and we have to pick one methodology to name a rank, but to me this one does not really reflect the commitment to spending or "saving."
The Suarez contract pays him $7.6M, this year, but later on he'll make $35M/yr. The AAV is $26M. To me, that's what we spent on him, but I'm not claiming my way is the only way to view this issue.
I'm sure some other teams have similar situations, and some teams are paying players more this year than their AAV is, thereby inflating their numbers and perhaps ranking, too.
Here are some interesting facts about our payroll:
Crochet makes $24,7M, but his AAV is $28.3M.
Sonny Gray has a $41M AAV, makes $31M this year, but STL pays $20M of it.
Contreras makes $18M, but STL pays $2M of it. His AAV is $21.3M.
Story makes $25M, and his AAV is $23.3M (I think he's the only Sox player with a lower AAV than 2026 salary other than Whitlock's $7.5M and $4.7M AAV.)
The younger player salary structure really warps the picture:
Salary/AAV
2.7/16.3 Anthony
6.2/9.2 Bello
2.3/7.5 Campbell
2.3/6.3 Ceddanne
I fully understand the merit of using just 2026 salary, since JH could dump these guys making more money, later, but some context is needed, IMO.
I'd say we are about #10 to #12 in spending. Most of us think we should be top 6.