moonslav59
-
Posts
108,914 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
162
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings
Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors
Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by moonslav59
-
Just because we added som eone, doesn't mean they will be on the 40 for long.
-
We know our team's attraction to plus RF defense and not caring too much about high K guys, if they can get on base enough or hit 30+ bombs, so we may settle for Gallo. We aren't the only team in need of a CF/RF'er, and Nimmo will have a lot of teams in on the bidding.
-
I don't want either, and it's a close call.
-
I fixed your post for you.
-
So, as I read it, we'd lose 2 picks and $1M of IFA bonus money, if we sign a QO FA: A team that exceeded the luxury tax in the preceding season will lose its second- and fifth-highest selections in the following year's Draft, as well as $1 million from its international bonus pool for the upcoming signing period. If such a team signs multiple qualifying-offer free agents, it will forfeit its third- and sixth-highest remaining picks as well.
-
I guess, if the rebuild is going on one more year, and we're looking for a 1-2 year guy, then okay, but we'd have to strike gold in many other areas to win in 2023 with Gallo as a FT'er.
-
Thaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh Yankeeeeeeeees Lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Not falling for it.
-
I'm not sure I'd rank any ahead of Haniger... maybe Conforto.
-
Agreed. Most likely never.
-
Shouldn't that be put in the 3rd person? You are slipping.
-
I'm not expecting much either, but Ferguson has some interesting numbers. We got 'em both in the Hosmer for Groome trade, so not much was expected.
-
I thought you called yourself the best poster.
-
I like the literal answer better.
-
Now, yes.
-
LOL. You only contradict yourself in discussions with me? Classic!
-
Yes, yes, yes, we know what history means to you with only certain players. Broken record.
-
I don't forget history.
-
None of the 4 prospects Bloom acquired at the deadline cracked the top dozen on the soxprospects.com's rankings list, but they did put up some impressive 2022 numbers: Enmanuel Valdez AA/AAA .296 28 107 (T 6th in RBI) .918 OPS (Only 2 players had a higher OPS and more PAs) Wilyer Abreu AA .247 19 73 (2nd w 114 BBs/ 3rd in runs scored w 106) 31 SB w 3 CS (.834 OPS- only 8 players had a higher OPS and more PAs) Max Ferguson A/A+ .214 7 60 (6th in SB w 61 w only 5 CS & 24th in runs, despite just 527 PAs) 8th in BB w 95 helped him to a .366 OBP Corey Rosier A+ .242 7 41 (.359 OBP w 40 SBs and 5 CS) .730 OPS Lots of nice OBPs and speed acquired.
-
Last year was last year. Forget about it!
-
notin's got the intangibles that Haniger only dreams of having.
-
Another might be Bellinger who has these career games started by position: 321 CF 214 !B 109 RF 37 LF
-
Except he started 57 games vs RH'd SP'ers and 43 vs LH'd starters. While the ratios of starters vs LH'd pitchers is much higher (43 out of 52) than vs RH's starters (57 out of 110), this doesn't look like a platoon, to me. He started more games vs righties than he did not start. He was a starter in 2019, not a sub. Not a back-up. Other years, maybe and yes.
-
That season, the Dodgers did seem to share the action among several players and play several players at multiple positions. I don't think doing that changes the fact that some players started and played in way more games than others and should not be called subs. Check this out... PAs at each position: C 228 Barnes 221 Martin 186 W Smith 1B 195 Muncy 139 Freese 119 Bellinger 92 Beaty 78 Pederson 9 Kike 2B 277 Kike 264 Muncy 78 Lux 59 Taylor 3B 521 J Turner 121 Muncy 3 Kike SS 534 Seager 133 Taylor 28 Kike LF 270 Pederson 124 Taylor 107 Beaty 73 Pollock 60 Verdugo 20 Kike CF 257 Pollock 232 Verdugo 86 Bellinger 72 Kike 49 Taylor RF 453 Bellinger 128 Pederson 68 Verdugo 29 Kike I suppose someone could argue the 2019 Dodgers had just 3 starters and 10 subs.
-
Yes, for many it does. Not Kike.
