Fair, inn terms of market value, yes, but that doesn't mean I'm on board with signing him to that.
I would not be upset, if we did. I was for offering Betts whatever it took.
I'm just not for trading even one top prospect for the right to sign someone to a high market value contract.
It was why I was against trading several prospects for Kimbrel and his near market value remaining contract. (True, the market leaped past his numbers right after the signing, and I have admitted that changed that dynamic of the trade, in hindsight.)