moonslav59
-
Posts
105,023 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
132
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by moonslav59
-
They did get the Pham option amount wrong, when that trade was made.
-
, The only way taking on that lux tax hit might make any sense is if Max Ferguson and Corey Rosier are way, way better than Jay Groome. (I don't see that, at all.)
-
Maybe Rogers. Don't know much about Senga. No way will those 4 will draw fans to the park or TV.
-
If going cheap placeholder at SS meant we could sign Judge, Rodon, Montero and Fulmer, would that satisfy most fans?
-
All the articles said the Padres picked up all the rest of the contract, minus the min salary. Nobody said the Sox took the tax hit. It would have been reported as such.
-
Playoff Rankings 1. Georgia 2. Ohio St. 3. Michigan 4. TCU 5. Tennessee 6. Oregon 7. LSU (highest ranked 2 loss team) 8. USC 9. Alabama 10. Clemson 11. Ole Miss 12. UCLA 20. Notre Dame
-
Maybe Simmons? Can Segura still play SS?
-
It's my wish, not my prediction. My guess is, we add 2 decent starters in hopes we find the next Wachas.
-
Some serious gobble-dee-goop.
-
It has to be on the Padres, but when it comes to MLB, you can't assume the logical answer.
-
That can't be right, but no site explains where that $6M tax budget differential goes.
-
The AAV only matters to a team, if they are going over the tax line. It doesn't help or hurt, otherwise. Hosmer signed a $144M/8 year contract that comes to $18M on the tax budget for all 8 years. Nothing changes that, except maybe who it counts against, if a trade happens. Yes, the Padres were paying him $21M for 5 years, and the tax line was only $18M, but it shows $18M for all 8 years, if you look at previous totals on cots. When they traded Hosmer to the Sox, they agreed to pay all but the min salary for the remaining contract. That means they pay the Sox $13M a year minus the min salary, but on the tax line, it should be $18M minus the min salary, as that line never changes. The $18M counts on someone's tax line, and IMO it should be SD, since they are paying almost his whole salary.
-
I totally agree, and trying to build a rotation by striking gold with #5 starters or long shots like Wacha and Martin perez with the Rangers, this season is not a strategy I support. Building a winning rotation almost always starts by adding solid #1 or #2 types, which pushes Sale and Whitlock to #3-4 starters and Bello and Pivetta to #4-5 or 6 starters. I'm not sure management is ready to trade top prospects to acquire an ace, but I'm thinking they may need to, this winter or next.
-
Yes, you are right. It's a $13M contract per year, from now on, but the tax number was and remains $18M. Another mistake by cots.
-
Cots has Hosmer on SDP's tax budget line as $12.28M, which deducts min salary from his salary.
-
"Those picks" used to be much higher than now.
-
I'd hate that. I'm all about "Devers Forevers," but I don't want what is happening to Bogey to happen again.
-
Me, too. I like Houck in the pen.
-
He should get an award for that.
-
LAD might offer T Anderson a QO.
-
A trade is likely to get more than a measly comp pick.
-
Career numbers (not very big sample sizes) Whitlock as SP'er OPS Against .587 1st PA (81 PAs) .901 2nd PA (72 PAs) .573 3rd PA (11 PAs) (As RP: .615 first PA (425 PAs) & .361 second PA (20 PAs) Houck as SP .504 1st PA (180 PAs) .647 2nd PA (164) 1.017 3rd (30) (as RP: .588 in 1st PA (195) and .423 in 2nd (25)
-
It might be closer to $90M, and instead of 8-12 slots needing help, like the past 3 winters, we might get by with 4-6 significant additions.
-
I did not mean by opening day. I think we start with Hoz-Dalbec or a new addition. If we signa RF'er, Refsnyder has to be a consideration, too. Arroyo is a decent hitter, as well. His splits are nearly even.
-
I'd prefer Brantley, but even his moderate contract cost could be used to upgrade other possible FA signings.
