It's "the spend like we did" comment that is not so clear cut.
No, we are not spending like 2018 or 2019, and we have not been 11th or 12th in spending since JH took over. Your point has merit, for sure, but we have reset many times- only to go on to spend larger again, afterwards.
We are spending more the 14+ seasons before 2015, perhaps even if adjusting for inflation.
The not being below 6th in opening day or EOY spending until the last 3-4 seasons is certainly factual. To me, it is more out of other teams suddenly spending like maniacs, than us spending less than before, but us spending less is a factor, for sure.
Some sort of tax began in 1997. We paid a tax in 1998 and a tiny one in 1999 ($21K.)
We then stayed under for 4 years, including 2 JH seasons.
We went over for 4 straight (2004-2007)
Under for 2.
Over for 2.
Under for 3.
Over for 2.
Under for 1
Over for 2.
Under for 2.
Over for 1 (2022 and not by much)
Looks like under for 2023
A clear pattern developed after 2008.
No 3 straight overs and only 1 under for 3 straight ('12-'14 surrounding a ring season!)
I happen to think we will spend, again. We may spend some at the deadline and get us up to 8th place in the spending rankings.
In terms of spending on actual active players- not player on the IL or paying players to play elsewhere, we are not much different from other years.
No paying ERod to sit out 2020
No Half-Price
No Rusney
No Pedey
No Pablito & HRam
No $3.9M Dodger payment for Crawford
I probably forgot others.
We even got something from Sale, finally.
We have one more year to pay Sale, and the budget looks clear of deadwood, unless Story continues to stay on the IL.
I expect more spending in 2024 and almost all of it on active 26 man roster players, except for Sale, who drops off after '24 and was not a Bloom signing.