Kimmi
-
Posts
27,852 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kimmi
-
User Name seems like a pretty knowledgable guy. So do you. I get that you two don't get along, for whatever reasons, but I'm not trying to take sides here. Both of you have some very good insight to offer, as do all the posters here. If it seems like I'm taking his side, it's only because his opinions seem to be very much in line with mine. It is nothing personal against you. I like you.
-
MLB introduces rules to speed up the pace of games.
Kimmi replied to Northern Star's topic in Other Baseball
While I get frustrated at times watching pitchers who take forever between pitches, I really don't want to see a pitch clock implemented. I like it when pitchers and batters can get inside of each other's heads. As far as automating balls and strikes, I hope that is something that will never come about. -
I think we fundamentally agree on more things than it seems. Sometimes, I think you just like to argue. LOL
-
Why do I give more weight to the Juggernaut? Well, for one, because he's a freaking juggernaut! And for two, because I agree with what he says and his posts support my argument. I'm not trying to say that you don't know what you're talking about. I'm sure that what you say is true for your experiences. I'm also sure that what User Name says is true for his experiences. The point remains, just because something hasn't worked for you company doens't mean that we should trash the whole concept for MLB. For baseball, the incorporation of analytics and technology have been successful.
-
Jacko, the optimism is not necessarily with the rotation itself, per se, but with the overall team. You can't look at the rotation in a vacuum. This rotation is not going to set the world on fire and it leaves a lot of people thinking "meh". However, when you consider several other factors, there is reason to be optimistic that it will be good enough to keep the team in contention, at least until the Sox can add another starter. As far as optimism for the rotation itself, there are reasons to be hopeful that these guys can show improvement this year. Buccholz is a flip of the coin, but when he's good, he's very good.
-
This is what I usually do - pick teams that are high seeds. I try to throw in a couple of "upsets", because those always happen. Not that I have any idea of what would really be an upset and what wouldn't. I can't go with prettiest uniforms because I don't know what their uniforms look like. I think I'll go with Calipari this year, because I'm assuming it rhymes with calimari.
-
+2 each to Spitball and User Name.
-
Or maybe they think Farrell is the guy who can get Masterson, Porcello, Miley, and Kelly to reach their potential. Buccholz is just an enigma. I almost think that he should not be allowed to make any decisions on the mound when there are runners on base. Don't let him think, just do what the catcher calls. IIRC, the Sox did this for a while with not letting him throw to first unless it was called from the dugout, and it seemed to help.
-
I agree with your first statement, to an extent. I think the bigger problem was not having a plan B, should those youngsters struggle, which they obviously did. Even so, the likelihood of all 3 of them struggling as badly as they did was small. Add to that, the struggles of most of the rest of the line up, and it's almost a perfect storm of what could go wrong.
-
The use of analytics and technology is most definitely a part of the skillset in scouting. A scout equipped with the knowledge of the analytics and technology and knows how to use this information to enhance his scouting will do a better job than a scout who doesn't. Although we agree that both are important and have their places in baseball, we are obviously never going to agree on the relative importance of scouting versus analytics.
-
The Bobby Valentine year does not count. As for last year, I challenge anyone to tell me truthfully that they knew the offense was going to be as bad as it was. We knew there would be a dropoff from 2013, but it should have been good enough to keep the team in contention. The team that was assembled was good. The abysmal offense was something nobody could have foreseen.
-
It will be an interesting year. Unfortunately, I think the FO is in a no-win situation from the viewpoint of some people. If the team fails, they will be endlessly bashed for not having a strong pitching staff. If the team is successful, it will be because the stars aligned perfectly or some voodoo magic like that, not because the FO actually did a good job. Truth be told, the way they built this team would not be my preferred method of building teams. That said, I am happy with the overall job that they did.
-
LOL, good one. Although you know I disagree that there will be a need for a fall guy.
-
Word from spring training is that he looked pretty darn good playing defense today.
-
MLB introduces rules to speed up the pace of games.
Kimmi replied to Northern Star's topic in Other Baseball
Yikes. Those are pics I do not want to see. -
When you lose weight, you don't just lose mass in your abdomen. You lose it in your arms and legs also. It's interesting that CC stated that he was too skinny last year. He came to camp 10 pounds heavier this year.
-
The Sox have extended Farrell through 2017, with an option for 2018. Ben really likes this guy. Farrell is no Francona, but I like him.
-
Nothing is fool-proof as far as translating into on-field success. Even a team of all the best scouts could not assure that. I know some will disagree, but I think the FO's track record speaks for itself. We've been one of the most successful franchises this century, and are set up well to continue being one of the most successful for the foreseeable future.
-
That's all I'm saying. It may or may not have much of an impact, but it's something that is certainly worth looking into. And it's something that more and more teams are buying into, so I'm guessing that there is something to it.
-
Well said Spitball. I've enjoyed your posts.
-
If you wait to see whether an idea works or not, any edge that you might have had is gone. By that time, every team is on board with the idea, and every team is back on an even playing field in regard to that tool.
-
I think upgrading the quality of scouts at the expense of technology/analytics, would do more harm than good. IMO, most good scouts tend to see the same qualities/talents in players. It's the analytics that give a scout the advantage over another scout, not a better eye.
-
MLB introduces rules to speed up the pace of games.
Kimmi replied to Northern Star's topic in Other Baseball
Ha ha Youk. Nice job! Started my day off with a good laugh. -
Seriously, what is the appeal of watching 2 dudes hit each other?
-
Might I suggest Women's Figure Skating?
