Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Kimmi

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Kimmi

  1. An insane amount of money is what you see the Yankees giving out to many players, prior to this offseason. And they are feeling the brunt of those bad contracts now. What they gave Ellsbury and McCann last year is insane, IMO.
  2. I read today that Moncada's position of choice is second base, for whatever that's worth. And I agree that if Pedroia gets injured this season, Betts is the logical choice to play second.
  3. I'm not sure how guaranteeing the option benefits the Sox though. It's a team option, so if Lee is pitching well, the Sox would pick it anyway. If Lee is injured or he stinks, the buyout would be the cheaper route. Unless they see something that leads them to believe that Lee could bounce back that second year. Otherwise, it just seems like an additional $15 mil that they lose out on.
  4. I'm thinking one on one swap with Philly kicking in a little cash. I know it's only a one year risk, but $37.5 mil is a lot for one year, especially if Lee flat out stinks or gets injured again. Maybe Lee would agree to waive the buyout in order to be traded to a contending team? Then a one on one swap would seem fair to me.
  5. Well, it comes down to what makes the team better as a whole, not what makes the team better at one position. The Sox have certainly set themselves up well as far as versatility goes.
  6. I disagree with that. I think the amount of money, and more particularly, the length of contract, is a big factor in their decisions. The FO is willing to spend, and they realize that usually they will have to overspend to some extent. However, they do have a limit to how much they will overspend. They typically will not reach the "insane" level with contracts.
  7. I just read this about players not being penalized for their rituals, as long as one foot stays in the box:
  8. I wouldn't at all mind Hamels in the rotation. I just think his price tag is too high. The $110 mil I could live with. The prospects on top of that, especially since we've been hearing that Swihart is the starting point, I cannot live with.
  9. I love Napoli. I never knew that he was struggling so badly with the sleep apnea thing. He said he feels like a new man. It will be interesting to see if his new found health can translate into more on field productivity.
  10. Pedroia is one guy I would never bet against. But even if he doesn't have a "big year" offensively, his defense and intangibles make him very valuable to the team.
  11. Who becomes our next 2nd baseman depends on how Pedroia holds up. If he plays at a productive level for the length of his contract, then both Betts and Moncada will have found different positions by then. I read something where Moncada's arm did not look that great at 3B, but that he looked very good playing 2B.
  12. I would be sad to see Victorino go, but that deal could make sense, depending on the specific terms of the deal. Lee would be a risk, but he would only be a one year risk.
  13. When I first heard about the Hanley signing, his attitude was a concern to me. However, everything that I have read and heard since then has changed my mind about that. He really does seem to have matured, and he seems to have a great attitude about being back in Boston. The rapport/chemistry among these guys seems to be strong.
  14. LOL Spud. You told me logic wasn't allowed, so I went with this.
  15. Whenever possible, getting players for "just money" is preferable to having to pay both money and players. And good post. You should post more often.
  16. Well, he is kind of cute.
  17. My head somewhat agrees with you, but the emotional side of me wouldn't be at all happy about sending Pedroia packing. Emotions aside, however, even with some declining offense, Pedroia has great value to this team.
  18. LOL It's not that important, so don't go all Fred on me about it.
  19. Yes, I am all too familiar with that type of thing. It's almost like that is a requirement of being a Yankees fan. LOL I don't know how Jacko was back then, but he doesn't seem that bad now, outside of rooting for the wrong team. At least he acknowledged a good signing for the Sox. The whole chart thing is too funny though. Thanks for the explanation.
  20. I like charts.
  21. I don't claim to know or understand it all. Far from it. But I find the whole area of analytics absolutely fascinating. I remember my first post ever on a forum was about BABIP. LOL FOs have much more data at their disposal than we have. I am sure that the FO signs their players partly due to reasons about which we have no clue.
  22. I've seen a couple of references to "the chart". What chart might that be?
  23. Thank you for having the integrity to post that. Believe me, I know it's not easy to watch a player that you want sign with the 'enemy'. For a Yankees fan, you're ok.
  24. I was not at all expecting the Sox to sign him, but the more I read about him, the more I like the signing. This signing gives the Sox so much flexibility, both in terms of the positions that he can play and in terms of making trades more possible.
  25. Fine, but even if we're talking FOs, sabermetrics are not what I would consider conventional wisdom, certainly not in the way that "we need a speedy runner to bat lead off" is conventional (and false) wisdom. Saber guys are always questioning and challenging their previous findings, along with developing new analytics and technology. The field is never stagnant enough to become 'conventional'.
×
×
  • Create New...