Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Kimmi

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Kimmi

  1. Absolutely. Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that our team isn't so good because JD joined it, but that JD is so good because he joined our team.
  2. No, I'd leave Bogey in the 5 hole. JD needs some protection.
  3. S5, what stat isn't flawed? And why are you willing to accept some flawed stats but not others?
  4. But WAR does work. What do you mean it doesn't work? The margin of error? Yes, it's flawed. So are strikeouts, as I've mentioned many, times. Being flawed does not mean that it doesn't work.
  5. This paragraph is almost like the writer is channeling his inner Kimmi: Of course, that ignores the trickle-down effect of adding Martinez. Maybe he provides lineup protection. Maybe he makes the other hitters better merely by his presence. Those are speculative ideas, however. One of the earliest and longest-running sabermetrics issues is the question of lineup protection, but comprehensive study after comprehensive study has failed to prove that such a thing exists. The Red Sox are better at the plate because Martinez is better than the players they had last year at his positions and because Betts is better than Betts.
  6. 1. Andrew Benintendi (L) LF 2. Brock Holt (L) 2B 3. Mitch Moreland (L) 1B 4. J.D. Martinez ® RF 5. Xander Bogaerts ® SS 6. Jackie Bradley Jr. (L) CF 7. Rafael Devers (L) 3B 8. Sandy Leon (S) C 9. Nathan Eovaldi ® P
  7. Brasier is working his way into that role, per Cora. Glad you and JBay got to see a great game.
  8. I'm not sure who you're talking about in the Giants clubhouse? A lot of the perception of whether a player is a punk or not probably depends on whether the player is on your team or not. I am guessing that if either Machado or Puig had played their careers with the Red Sox, I would not consider them punks. Personal bias, for sure.
  9. This article sums it up rather well.
  10. Ha. It's interesting how JD is getting credit for everyone else's home runs.
  11. He has been mentioned, and he is definitely worthy of the award. My argument was just in terms of who is more deserving between Mookie and JD.
  12. In the case of batter 'protection', there is strong statistical evidence that batters do not hit any better when they have a strong hitter behind them supposedly protecting them. There is evidence that pitchers may pitch differently to the 'protected' batters, but the batters do not reap any benefits from that. People can talk about line up protection all day, but the numbers just don't bear that out.
  13. Sandy received some very strong praise from Porcello last night.
  14. Catching is definitely more grueling than CF. My only point in comparing the two positions is that I prefer strong defense from those positions over strong offense.
  15. LOL The best laid plans of mice and men.
  16. Machado and Puig are both players that strike me as "punkish" type players. The Dodgers would be a difficult team for me to root for. Also interesting to note that the Athletics have closed the division lead to just one game. It's amazing how well they have played and how much ground they have made up.
  17. I agree with your first two sentences. I also like Moreland/Pearce in the 3 hole, followed by JD, then Bogaerts. We just have a really good line up. You can't really go wrong with it.
  18. Catcher offense, like JBJ's offense, is never an issue with me as long as the rest of the guys are doing their jobs. I think we've all seen how valuable Sandy and Jackie have been to the team defensively. Any offense they provide is gravy. This is why I always liked Varitek behind the plate, even when he was no longer hitting.
  19. I don't think anyone is arguing that JD has made the line up better by lengthening it. I'm arguing against the idea of protection.
  20. Of course it's my opinion, as is 95% of what's posted here. I'm not going to preface every statement with "IMO". That said, I am 100% convinced of my opinion. Just as I'm sure you are 100% convinced of yours.
  21. Just as I really like Mookie leading off, I really like Jackie batting 9th.
  22. Thank you for this Harmony. While this is still not enough to conclude anything, it strengthens my belief that the Sox offense would have improved significantly even without JD, and that JD is not some magical line up protecting presence. Not that my belief needed any strengthening.
×
×
  • Create New...