What are you talking about? Who was promoting Paredes with less control as a viable trade for Duran (PLUS MORE!) when he has more control? Spier, Jen Mc, Cotillo, McAdams and multiple national commentators all said multiple times across different podcasts and articles that Astros wanted him for Paredes.
A simple google shows this up straight away -
"Meanwhile, Houston would jump at a chance to acquire Duran in exchange for Isaac Paredes," McCaffrey writes.
Sending Paredes to the Red Sox for Duran would be a big win for the Astros. Meaning, they'd likely need to attach a bit more to this trade to get the Red Sox to bite.
But landing Duran, a left-hitting outfielder who would be a massive upgrade over their current group, would be a no-brainer if they could pull it off.
And while sending away Paredes would be sad, he'd be more than worth moving on from if it meant that Duran would be coming to Houston.
However, McCaffrey notes that Paredes, with his 115 OPS+ and below-average defense, might not be as enticing for the Red Sox in a trade.
While she isn't shutting down the notion of a deal, the Red Sox would be more likely to explore other infielder additions than that of Paredes.
He's a one-year rental, and while he's tailor-made for the Green Monster in left field in Boston, this swap doesn't fit the Red Sox's needs as much as it does the Astros."
____
The reason it didn't happen is not because anyone in their right mind thought the Sox had to give more.
At the very least it is clearly not true to say there was no interest in Duran.