Well, this is a silly argument, and you're changing the facts as you go. You said 5-6", which I thought was ridiculous; you now say it was a foot (I erredin accepting what you said the first time as what you meant). And I'm guessing (you apparently know, but I don't) that Hanley would not have started to swing at a pitch a foot inside that "would" have hit him square in the ribs. Maybe it "would" have, but that "would" not be supported at all by the video replay, which you may as well claim now is likely doctored and not real evidence.