sk7326
-
Posts
7,663 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by sk7326
-
And of course, universal DH remains a great idea.
-
I have gone back and forth - but MLB is often so stoddgy about new rules and tinkering with entertainment value that this is a welcome departure. I don't love the ghost runner - but I do agree that in the regular season having games longer than 12 innings, particularly with how pitchers are handled - is not sustainable and kind of sucks for viewers. Would you prefer something like this over declaring ties after 13 innings or something? I have come around on the shift banning. Mandating suboptimal behavior so there are more balls put into play makes sense to me. Little baseball is fun - not instead of homeruns, but just being able to have that as part of my baseball life.
-
There is a wide range of outcomes - this is where looking at some of the detailed reports and not just the rankings helps. Mata missed development time with the injury. Chris Murphy has just had trouble throwing strikes. And of course pitching is just volatile anyway. But the org does not have at this moment even an Anderson Espinoza of yore type - yes he was dealt, got hurt, flamed out ... but the industry saw a #1/#2 starter in there in lower levels. Kopech was the last blue chip pitcher they have had. What has happened is that the org has done a nice job just getting big league "something" type of arms - more than in a long time. But whether those are quality starters or long relievers or relievers where 20 of them will appear in a big league game and Cora manages the team like an All-Star game? That is an open question.
-
This year will give us an idea exactly how gold plated he is ... at some point he's going to be a 20 year old in Portland, which would make him one of the youngest regulars in AA. If he plays well this season, then it's time to dream very big.
-
This is fair ... McDaniel's main critique is the next wave of prospects coming has to step up. And of course if some of the arms in the organization start to flash some "closer to ceiling" outcomes then everything really starts coming up Red Sox.
-
Since Theo/Cherington left? No - but it was also when the system was drained by graduations and such. He put Devers in his Top 100 at ESPN based on what he did in the complex league.
-
18 is also not very high and probably outside where you'd expect likely major leaguers anyway. I reckon there is not much separation between 18 and 40 aside from some positional preference and where ceiling vs floor is in your values system.
-
A dart throw based on an elite athletic profile.
-
This is a little bit unfair. Ownership hired him to build a champion - and they gave him the greenlight to do it. Indeed, Dombrowski's acumen mattered a lot - in that his job was to look at all of the Sox premium prospects and make ex ante calls on all of them. And it turned out, he was mostly right - though Moncada has been a perfectly solid starting IF and Kopech is a very good starter when healthy (which has not been often). And the two prospects he and his team decided were the real deals, he promoted them extremely aggressively. (I think Benintendi and Devers had a combined 3 days at AAA)
-
(more) Honorable Mentions Fallen: Cam Cannon Leap Candidates
-
Law deep dive on Sox: https://theathletic.com/4146022/2023/02/07/red-sox-top-20-prospect-farm-system-ranked/ 1. Marcelo Mayer (#11 overall) 2. Ceddane Rafaela (#37 overall) 3. Triston Casas (#40 overall) 4. Miguel Bleis (#72 overall) 5. Bryan Mata, RHP 6. Nick Yorke, 2B 7. Mikey Romero, SS 8. Matt Lugo, SS/3B 9. Brandon Walter, LHP 10. Blaze Jordan, 3B/1B 11. Chris Murphy, LHP 12. Roman Anthony, OF 13. Edinson Paulino, Wherever 14. Brainer Bonaci, SS 15. Wikelman Gonzalez, RHP 16. Gilberto Jimenez, OF 17. Cutter Coffey, SS 18. Nathan Hickey, C 19. Nico Kavadas, 1B 20. Shane Drohan, LHP
-
The mood swings are 100x more important than the GM here.
-
It's not. NOW, the firing of Dombrowski was not really justified because he did exactly what the owners wanted him to do. But Bloom has been fine - he is dealing with ownership level issues. Heck, Dombrowski's worst move - the extremely risky at the time extension for Chris Sale - had ownership buy-in. Ownership doesn't blindly delegate spending decisions like THAT.
-
A lot has to go right in a division there 83 wins might be last place. The bullpen makeover is encouraging - we know bullpen performance is volatile as a thing, but there is a lot of depth. The rotation has a lot of bodies. And I do trust Cora to piece that together more or less. Last year we had a case where the team got jack squat out of key offensive positions. (RF/1B) That should be better Of course, the center of the field is now uncertain. I will say last year, the team's farm guys all had rough seasons. And basic law of averages points to hopefully that not being the case. And yeah, Sale is a huge key - though at this point I am waiting for the next, innvovative way he gets himself injured.
-
ESPN (Kiley McDaniel) ranks Boston at 14
-
Ultimately the assessment of the system comes down to how one views the pitchers in it. The team has brought in a lot of pitchers with a fairly wide range of outcomes. Position player-wise the org is in a much better position for sure (4 guys in the top 100 is evidence there). And of course longer term, the goal is for the system to be able to get to where the Dodgers are in consistently being able to make players better, or how Cleveland has been able to spit out one young starting pitcher after another.
-
I will push back on 3. He is very transparent about the rankings - the folks who do public facing work in this area (as it turns out, most of them are friends and appear on each other's shows) are going to have less information than teams do. They are doing the best they can. He has mentioned often - that he, Longenhagen (Fangraphs), McDaniel (ESPN) or Jim Callis (MLB.com) have different rankings but that none of them are "wrong". They all go and see as many prospects as possible, and the process is sound. The other thing is - when I've heard him on shows, he will just give his opinion when asked without the usual "well, you never know" sort of stuff. He's paid for takes - there you go. And - to be fair - most prospects don't make it, and an honest assessment of any random sample of prospects is likely to be negative. FWIW, here is the blurb for #23 from the Athletic - https://theathletic.com/4138444/2023/02/02/mlb-farm-system-ranking-prospects/ Dodgers, Guardians, Orioles, Diamondbacks, Rays are the Top 5 (given where they have been drafted, the Orioles and D-Backs BETTER be good)
-
The thing with the Rays is that they have spent a LOT on infrastructure and I am curious whether that has followed in Boston. Like Tampa has one of the league's largest pro scouting groups. Bloom and Dombrowski both were intentional at adding arms and that has been good. But there is a lot of reliever risk with all of them - even the ones we like. Whitlock and Tanner Houck, M.D. both have a lot to prove there (I am more optimistic about Whitlock).
-
The ranking of the farm system is interesting - and it's driven by the one thing you really can ding Bloom for (and has been a real surprise) - the lack of pitching in the organization. The position players are interesting - 3 or 4 players are in the various Top 100s (4 for Law, 3 for ESPN). I think there has been a concerted effort to add pitchers - but besides Bello, the system has not produced anybody with great starter projection. I am old enough to remember Clay Buchholz coming out of AAA and pitching a no-hitter in 2007. There is no pitcher of that level of repute.
-
Well the Sox plummeted to the bottom having a 60 game stretch that lots of teams have in normal seasons. The next season they won 90 again. That said, the trade really is more about the Dodgers are the class org of the league - what the Red Sox could/should aspire to and way aren't at the moment.
-
You don't have to broadcast every specific move - but it's about series of moves reflecting an underlying plan. And that largely hasn't happened. There have been a series of band-aids. In 2021, the bandaids were good enough to come 6 wins from a most unlikely banner, last year those bandaids crapped out. The last decade of Red Sox baseball more than anything else has been a story of ownership's priorities with the ballclub whiplashing pretty violently. Amazingly, they were wire-to-wire the best team in baseball in 2 of those seasons. Baseball historians in 20 years or so are going to be very confused.
-
I think botching the Bogaerts negotiations was a different deal - just a different level of player. If ownership decided they'd give Devers or Bogaerts a megacontract but not both, obviously Devers is the priority. The tough part of the Bogaerts thing is at least the public perception (Bloom and reporting around him did not help) that the Sox were caught with their pants down. Since we have to take the Sox' tax concerns as a given - there is no point litigating that - I totally get the ambivalence towards a deal like the one the Padres gave him. The club has had trouble articulating a direction - exactly what are we trying to do here? And the moves on their own have not given much indicator either.
-
It was a failure - but mostly of ownership. As a baseball trade - I have indicated it has not been great, but given the circumstances the process was sound. If there is a complaint about the return at the time of the trade - it was the lack of pitching coming back, considering how horrifyingly bereft of organizational pitching depth there was/is.
-
This is true about all trades and about life. But evaluating process ex ante is still worth doing - it's the information the teams and fans have when the trade is made. After all, if every one of those players in the Soto trade got hit by a bus, are we going to go "well, time sure ruled on that trade".
-
Hard to say - it was obviously the best players they got offered. The more important question is when did the Red Sox know the situation was without resolution and what to do about it. The real sliding doors moment with Betts was the 2019 trade deadline. That was when the team could have had some substantial leverage, but it would have involved selling during a season they were in some "low but not THAT low" percentage wildcard contention.