Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

sk7326

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,663

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sk7326

  1. sk7326
    Will be fun to see how it goes - the linescores don't affect my perception (you never know what he was asked to work on) ... see if he is still throwing free and easy
  2. sk7326
    I don't know - just speculating about who'd be the best fit there ... too many starters is a good problem to have though definitely.
  3. sk7326
    The forcing his way out (minor factor) and the suspensions after (less minor factor) make that hard. The Sox have definitely used the HoF as a barometer for the guys they retire. Ortiz will by the end of his career at least be in a discussion (I'd say no, but I'd listen). Manny probably won't given the precedent - at least for a while.
  4. sk7326
    Oh that'd be silly. More along the lines that Buchholz is more likely to be a Top 4 starter than Doubront ... Doubront at this time more likely to be a Top 3 reliever on this staff for October. Either way nothing wrong with "too many starters"
  5. sk7326
    Buchholz coming off an injury might HAVE to start because he needs his work regulated. Put him in the bullpen in October you are committing to him being ready in a moment's notice and on back to back nights. I think Doubront is much better equipped for that workload.
  6. sk7326
    I think they can wait until he retires. And it's a no-brainer ... the hero of the team that broke the curse and a stalwart thereafter. He also doubles as maybe the greatest scrapheap pickup in baseball history. Next Sox player to get his number retired is probably Pedro Martinez one'd imagine.
  7. sk7326
    I did - for now. Until Buchholz shows he's ready to go - it is a fair assessment. That said, if Buchholz is healthy and there is no WC to worry about ... I would leave off Dempster and move Doubront into the swing position. While he has been good, he is the least reliable of their rotation guys, and his stuff could be absolutely nasty in 30-40 pitch bursts.
  8. sk7326
    I think if De La Rosa had shown he could be the "other" short righty out of the pen to go with Tazawa, this would have been a more interesting discussion. But Workman has clearly won that battle - so it becomes "who is the multi-inning reliever". Dempster is really the only solid choice left.
  9. sk7326
    He has been striking guys out at a good rate too - and (just going from my hazy memory) the first time through the order he has been pretty solid - it's the other stuff that has been wobbly. The fastball will play up in the pen ... I think for 6 outs at a time in a situation where he can focus on fastball-splitter he can be an asset late in the season.
  10. sk7326
    Gostkowski yanked an extra point after the 3rd touchdown
  11. sk7326
    I am more confident in Dempster - he's closed and the strikeout rate has been solid all season. He has had issues turning over a lineup, but his stuff has been swing and miss this year and the fastball will play up a little with the job change. I figure Workman is safe as the second righty too - though more looks and more "unplanned" chances does not hurt. Morales v Thornton is probably the actual decision for the staff.
  12. sk7326
    Also another thing about Workman mopping up here ... You figure that Farrell will go with 10 pitchers for the playoff roster. You have your Top 4 starters and Dempster moving into the swing spot. That leaves 5 relief spots. Brelow, Tazawa, Uehara are locks. Workman, Morales, Thornton are probably "competing" for 2 spots. I think Farrell will take the time here to get as many looks at all three guys as makes sense.
  13. sk7326
    Given the cigarette prices in Massachusetts, this was probably $25 down the drain for him
  14. sk7326
    apparently a slo-pitch has broken out here ...
  15. sk7326
    I don't disagree - just speculating on his logic here. Certainly to me it's a signal he is counting on a key role for Workman in October. Part of that might be just getting him experience with getting up for these stints - both in high and lower leverage scenarios. Once we get to the big games, not going to have the luxury to space out Workman's appearances. I would have just promoted Wright for an occasion like this - but I do see the aspects of just getting guys ready for the postseason.
  16. sk7326
    If they want to give X a chance to earn the everyday job - that is one thing. But absolutely - to think we chose the wrong SS between Drew and Iglesias is folly. Drew has been very good this season - the optics of how much he strikes out I think throws some fans off the scent of how valuable he has been.
  17. sk7326
    I don't want X up here if he is not going to start - he is young enough that the AAA reps do not hurt at all. If you want Drew and Middlebrooks to man the fort next season, by all means but let it be them. Drew I think has had a good season and is clearly a Top 10ish shortstop. But I suspect somebody will offer him a multiyear deal - and he has, like Beltre did with us, rebuilt his value - and I don't think I'd want to do that.
  18. sk7326
    I wonder how much of it is just developing his ability to just get up on short notice - they seem to be grooming him to be Tazawa insurance here (given Tazawa's occasional cold streak and homerun bug). He has been starting and been stretched out so much, he might just need some work at just being ready for more condensed work. Only thing I can think of.
  19. sk7326
    Holy crap - I remember when Jeremy Bonderman was the Tigers #1! (like 2006 ...) now mopping up a September game.
  20. sk7326
    They are leaning hard on Verlander and Scherzer clearly ... Verlander has been way inferior to Scherzer this season, but he probably gets the call for Game 1
  21. sk7326
    There we go - if they can't land a guy like a Choo or something ... seriously, Nava/Gomes as a 2-headed left fielder is plenty effective.
  22. sk7326
    I think I'd settle for him being to spoil sliders low and away. We know "approach" is born and not made. He's never going to walk a ton and he's never going to see a ton of pitchers. That's fine - Nomar and Vlad Guerrero made fine livings being up there to hack. He just needs to square up the pitches he wants and being able to at least get a bat on the stuff that bothers him.
  23. sk7326
    2 years for a durable starter - you look at what the market pays for guys like Edwin Jackson for instance ... guys whose central virtue is that they never get hurt ... and that everybody is drowning in money (you know it's a buyers market when BJ Upton got what he got from the Braves - and it was "reasonable" for the free agent class). Dempster at 2/26 is a very fair price. I've been annoyed with the inconsistency, but he has been there every fifth day - and in a sport where you want your Kyle Weilands as far the hell away from any start that matters as possible, that is a talent in itself. We do not get to the playoffs without his contribution.
  24. sk7326
    It is - it also helps give you an idea at the sort of reliever you give real money to ... Rivera, your 2006-2008 Papelbon, prime Joe Nathan, Koji if he had more of a long run track record of 2013
  25. sk7326
    Oops - what I get for typing while you sent this
×
×
  • Create New...