This is true - although in a more long run sense. Rebuilding seasons are ok - as long as the plan is clear and the purpose is there. Theo in Chicago has had a couple of rough seasons - but the team was barren in the farm and bloated in the big league club. Moves so far have been turning Paul Maholm, Matt Garza, trading guys who were not going to be part of the next decent Cubs team - particularly good hauls for both. I severely doubt that the ND receiver gets much - still an average big league starter. Not like he is going to help a contender the way Garza projected to.
Running stuff in Boston is a tough gig. On some level, ownership sees the Red Sox as a TV channel and Tourist attraction that fields a baseball team. There are always those sorts of pressures from both the fans and the front office. A baseball operation sacrificing sexy moves for good baseball decisions is tougher here at times. Certainly in 2011-12 the team's management succumbed to those temptations - after the best decade in modern Red Sox history.
How would I rate the FO - can this team churn out 90 win seasons every year (assuming normal injury luck) ... can't really use "titles" as a criteria - since a FO can't control that? We are close to being there again. In some ways, the minors is like college basketball. You can have an amazing group of dudes, some of them graduate via trade or promotion - and then your system is bare except for guys in short season ball, if that. Cherington's team - and to be fair the final vestiges of Epstein drafts - have been able to restock the system with both guys who could help us, as well as help land veteran help. For Boston in particular, it is the ability to augment the financial advantages with the prospect inventory so that the Red Sox can fill virtually any hole on the big league roster. We are more or less there now. What I have seen good from Cherington so far is that he is not going to just sit on prospect depth - moving Iglesias for Peavy was a smart move which required some proactiveness. What I have seen bad is that he has done this to acquire "proven closers" - P U.
Next offseason will be fascinating - because the Sox will have the money and the prospect depth to makeover the team as radically (knock on Seattle and King Felix' door) or as conservatively as they want (give Nava some platoon help, add some bullpen help). They have more pieces than they have had in quite some time.