Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

sk7326

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sk7326

  1. There are very few managers who (tactically) add value. Francona - in terms of handling the pitching staff - qualifies. But - in terms of the lineup - even with Cleveland - he is not much of a tinkerer ... it's really hard to make much of a dent there.
  2. All of this. Managing is really hard. Hell, simply being the Red Sox' press secretary (which is part of the job) would drive most people insane.
  3. I think the stat line helps ... but really it is about whether he just deal with the lesser level of instruction. Can he make the adjustments on the fly - turn scouting reports and video analysis into action at the plate? Is he ready for (what I imagine could be) a fairly lonely situation. (although it helps there are a lot of young guys on the team - he'd be the only one who couldn't go to a watering hole) If those answers are fine - there is almost no chance he'd be worse than status quo at 3B. Now this doesn't mean I won't give Sandoval a chance - but Devers deserves credit for making this a conversation we're having in May 2017.
  4. From scouting fwiw, there is very little chance Moncada stays at 2B (there is a reason more 2B look like Pedroia than like Dez Bryant). Breathe - the team is playing .500ish ball ... just like the Cubs and the Guardians. They're 0.5 games out of a playoff spot. It has been a weird season so far - since the team has not actually been able to string anything together - good or bad. You are right about the Pomeranz deal and the Kimbrel one to a point. Sale - the price hurts some, but he is a really great pitcher. So far, DD's tenure includes a playoff berth, and a team with good chances of adding more. Now that is not all him - but no reason to panic yet.
  5. Fair enough - but again, the building blocks of runs - baserunners, solid contact ... all of that is still there. I wish the team were winning more games - but given how rough the start has been (injuries, luck) ... I am betting the over still
  6. They are 15th in the bigs in runs scored - but somehow 3rd in OBP and tops in lowest K-rate. I am pretty sure there were 35 games like this a year ago. There is more reason to expect improvement than regression (or even status quo).
  7. nothing that a few balls finding gaps won't fix. Generating tons of baserunners - not giving away outs. Essentially a middle of the pack offense with the underlying performance of a much better one, Really poor luck as much as anything right now.
  8. I think Pablo will get a fair chance. And if Devers comes up it is after the break - probably on the road. Just bat him 9th and let him figure it out.
  9. I think you are probably looking at for likelihood by July 50% Pablo 20% Devers 20% Patchwork (rotating cast - basically now) 10% Someone else The bar is very low for the position given what they have been getting.
  10. I do too. Last year just showed that A) Moncada was a little bit further away than it looked (but not at all "behind") The "bust" end of his range of outcomes (read Castillo, Rusney) was a little lower than it looked a year ago. The White Sox are in a better position for him to be a good player. They are not playing for 2017 - they can make moves with a longer view with him.
  11. I think the issue of dealing him was that he WAS going to be fairly low ceiling offensively - BUT if this what he is (modest power, average to above average on-base, good defense) ... that is a quality starter right now, and even if he doesn't get one bit better that is very valuable given cost control. The deal on its face is okay - Sox dealt surplus to get something they lacked. Could they have spun a blocked guy like Margot into more? I think so - but that is fair game at least.
  12. Guerra's stock has fallen as far as any 22 year old would - which is "some, but not that much". Plenty of time to bounce back from a rotten season.
  13. the market is pretty crazy ... now we can argue market efficiency (giggle, giggle) but whatever. I think what DD has done on this front is not atypical. And you can't deny Kimbrel's 55% K rate. This version of him is worth the bother - last year's model less so. I am happy with the output. He is starting to live up to his deal.
  14. i used to think this when i was little kid - until i realized that unless you miss games, injuries will not heal.
  15. Entering the season - there was a reasonable (30% or so) probability Rodriguez would end up this team's 2nd best starter - so far so good.
  16. The more interesting question is - how many relievers hold their value for more than a couple of seasons at a time? For the most part - very, very, few. And the second question is - how much of an edge does that give you over "above average" work - probably not that much. Now the ability to get 6 outs from time to time - that is worth paying for. But the ability to hold a lead for 3 outs with the bases empty is largely not that big a deal.
  17. These guys self scout constantrly - I think they knew they had something legit in Benintendi and Devers. I don't think they thought Devers would be in Boston this season - but he could be forcing them to re-look at it. It's early - but the signs are interesting. And we know DD will promote a guy aggressively if he believes in the kid.
  18. His avg/hr/rbi was good at AA ... he also struck out a third of the time against sub-major league pitching. The former would have indicated he had developed his hitting - the latter would have given pause.
  19. They are ... the Red Sox won the World Series in 2013 with their 3rd choice for closer, they beat a Cardinals team who won the pennant with its second choice for closer ... the Giants won 3 world series with three different closers - with their 2012 closer getting demoted in 2014. Closers in baseball are the equivalent of running backs in football ... some teams want to spend a ton of money for a hoss ... great. But a lot of teams do well doing what the Patriots do putting no money into it. After all, reliever performance is so volatile that churn is built into things - and there is a bottomless pit of candidates (basically any failed starter - since that's what relievers are).
  20. I think it is pretty straightforward. This is him - there will be streaks, good and bad. The defense will be marvelous - the throwing arm uncommonly excellent for the position. He is a starting caliber CF, which is intrinsically valuable. I do think he is outside of Devers the best trade chip the Sox have to pick up something more than say a back-end starter.
  21. Kimbrel manages to increase his strikeout rate which was over 55% entering the game - ridiculous
  22. Let me rephrase - Betts is their best player, and their most dangerous hitter. But Benintendi might be their best hitter in terms of craft, taking great at-bats and such. I am thinking along the lines of Allen Craig before his body fell to pieces, or like Harold Baines of my youth.
  23. In the regular season I am totally with limiting how often he does it - you don't want to ride him to death - but absolutely in certain spots, go right to your best guy. And Kimbrel has been really really good - he has nearly matched his 2016 fWAR already. (he's striking out over 55% of the hitters he faces - which is unsustainably insane)
  24. Defensively he might have a ways to go - although the talent is there ... but it is rather amazing that a kid in AA a year ago might very well be their best pure hitter.
×
×
  • Create New...