Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

FredLynn

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,867
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by FredLynn

  1. Gotta bring in Beninendi here.....why not send Hanley?
  2. I just don't know what to say about a post like that.
  3. There will come a point, perhaps, if Bradley cannot snap out of where he is at, when a replacement will be needed. That time is not now. It might be in June or so. For now, he plays, and we can all cringe when his turn to bat comes up. Yes...imagine how good we could be with a CF who can actually hit the baseball AND play an acceptable CF. Love to see it.
  4. Truth is, we may get neither. If Kimbrel is asking for a ridiculous amount of money I would let Hanley go (I would let him go in nearly any case) and also not sign Kimbrel if it means grossly overpaying him.
  5. If we are not hitting we should be looking to upgrade wherever possible. Its hard to find catchers who can hit. Not so with OF....there are more of them. Now who is available is the question, and at what price. Last year we struggled offensively. I do not want to see that again this year. If Bradley can at least hit .726 he might be worth keeping on a struggling team (offensively). It depends on the context.
  6. Nope. But he would certainly be our worst hitting OF. You need to score runs in this league to win. Preventing runs is great, but you also need to score.
  7. I disagree. Simple as that. You cannot take his offensive production in a vacuum. If we are last in hitting in the AL, for example, we cannot afford JBJ. If we are scoring, for example, one run per game, I don't care if JBJ is saving six. We still lose. We would, in that circumstance, need someone who can PRODUCE runs.
  8. No doubt he will improve on .399. Last year I think he was at .726. I don't think you can take those number in vacuum. If the team already has guys who cannot hit the baseball then we are going to need a CF who can hit better than .726. If the team is already hitting we can afford someone like Bradley who is basically inept with a bat in his hands but defensively is a genius. I am sure that management is going to consider the context in which JBJ is performing rather than his numbers in isolation.
  9. Last year, of the 62 AL OF with at least 200 PAs, Bradley ranked 44th in OPS. On the other hand, he ranked 15th in WAR. I do not value WAR as much as more objective data since WAR relies too much on subjective defensive metrics. Still, its obvious that Bradley is a very good defensive OF. There has to be a floor below which he should be removed from the lineup. So far this year his OPS is .399 with an OPS+ of 15. That is clearly below that floor. I have seen little evidence that he, as you put it, "will get better" so far. Where that floor is is the fodder for debate.
  10. Funny....you could also say that Bradley has been in a "slump" for his last 600 PAs. Or you can say that he isn't a very good offensive player. Never mind: I will say it. The only debate is whether or not his shortcomings with a bat are compensated for by his defensive prowess.
  11. The problem with this idea is that Benintendi is not going to play every game, and if he gets injured or needs a day off, who then plays CF? Betts might be able to do it, but his job is RF. If Bradley continues to look awful (.120/.414) at the plate, they are going to have to address it, eventually.
  12. One guy (I think he is a UFC fighter) said that the banned substance that turned up in his urine was because he ate meat (beef) from Mexico while he was training there. Who knows? At the end of the day the athlete has to be held accountable for positive test results IMO. Otherwise there will be a litany of excuses as to how the test results were positive. There is no other way.
  13. Making the playoffs because Ramirez is performing well isn't enough for me to want him on the team next year-we have to have a realistic chance to win a ring. We should have a pretty decent idea (yes, I know nothing is certain once we get into the playoffs) of where we stand relative to the other playoff teams. If we can go DEEP into the playoffs, go for broke. Otherwise, next year we will BE broke.
  14. Where will the stupidity end? Do these guys think they aren't going to get caught? https://www.boston.com/sports/boston-red-sox/2018/04/06/top-red-sox-prospect-michael-chavis-suspended-80-games
  15. And its still true
  16. Golf=bowling
  17. Obviously that was an exaggeration. However, he had an OPS of .726 last year and so far this year its under .400. How much time do you give him to prove he can hit the baseball? I say another month or so.
  18. Yeah. For two games. Then he will continue to suck. He has no clue at the plate.
  19. Damn....JBJ is up. As close to an automatic out as there is.
  20. Martinez has sure been a great signing so far.....you just can't GIDP there.
  21. Might as well leave him in now, right? Why waste another RP?
  22. Well Carson Smith officially sucks.
  23. Smith comes in to walk a guy who is probably the fastest guy in the league....pretty dumb.
×
×
  • Create New...