Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

cp176

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by cp176

  1. Really - you want to go this route again? Not everyone agrees that advanced analytics tell the story in its entirety. No one that I can think of discredits the use of analytics as a tool to be used. Kind of looks to me as though if you don't agree with me and my small circle than you must be wrong and just don't get it. In this on going great debate about the over or under use of analytics, there is no right and no wrong IMO.
  2. I'll say one thing that doesn't seem to be very popular with some here. I'm very happy that we have DD doing the negotiating for us. I'm really not sure I see a great advantage to a Stanton signing which might cost us something significant as opposed to a Martinez signing which costs just $. We need at least one real power bat in that lineup. Both of these guys provide it. It has 0 to do with power being popular as opposed to trying to infuse some real hit into an otherwise fairly anemic offense. It's a good thing to have lots of little singles hitters particularly when they are hitting but it should not be considered a luxury to have somebody in there with the power to knock a few of our little fellows in.
  3. C's gut out another one this afternoon. Tatum's length is a weapon. Big effort from Theis off the bench. Good to see Smart have a little bounce back. Team just keeps digging.
  4. probably right
  5. Depending on what is decided about JBJ, the team overall could see a significant improvement with Martinez out there if you get the return you would expect for JBJ.
  6. ? Really??? I would be stunned - pleasantly I guess but my guess is no.
  7. This I know but I'm still not sold on it being enough of an upgrade to warrant trading away quality as well as taking on the contract. Martinez sounds like an awesome offensive upgrade as well and we still get to trade or not for immediate upgrades. Tell me why this doesn't make sense? I like Stanton as well but I just think that there is some common sense that gets factored in here as well.
  8. I would not give up any player who could or is helping us currently if I could sign martinez for just $. If I had to trade someone in that current outfield (JBJ) in order to make room for either Stanton or Martinez, I would sign Martinez and then make a trade for someone else who could helps us somewhere else. Common sense moves not sensational moves and signings. I'm not convinced that Stanton over Martinez is a huge difference in the upgrade department.
  9. Wouldn't it just be so much easier to sign Matinez? Get your hitter and still save your save chips.
  10. After last night - who can the hornets beat? That was some nasty bb played. I wasn't sure for a while if either team wanted to win. Gut check for the C's and they survived it. Is Howard really that much of a pecker head? And how about the call late in the game when Rozier stepped out of bounds. He might not have been pushed but hands were on his back and the only way Charlotte was going to stop the clock was to foul. could not believe the no-call. 2 words - Shane larkin.
  11. kiss principle has always worked even when people get in the way and try to over complicate things!
  12. I don't have any idea how they will work out the particulars, but I will be very surprised if the hard play isn't for Martinez. Just read Bradford's article and sounds to me as though he would be just what the doctor ordered. Sign him and then figure out what to do with him as well as the others. I am not sold at all on Benintendi moving to center and trading Bradley but who knows. You want good people in that dugout. After what happened last year, we need real people who actually get it in there.
  13. Has nothing to do with a belief in a mythical coming cliff. That is reality. Pretty sure that everybody is aware that contracts come to their conclusion. Players get traded, drafts are dealt with, new contracts get signed. Do you think maybe that this reality that has always existed represents some sort of dark foreboding cliff that we hear so much about? It surely has given some a topic to talk, vent, and gripe about. That's about it .
  14. I think that those are all good arguments. You have to think that DD is looking at some of these situations in the same light to be honest. I don't even want to make a guess as to how it all will be worked out but I do think that it will get worked out.
  15. No offense here meant Moon at all but some of us truly do not believe in the cliff concept at all. We don't see the sense of urgency that you see with respect to the next few years. I don't mind being considered blind or naive or someone who is simply in denial either. If the decision is made to at some time move Devers to first base with respect to making our team better, I will be on board with that as well. Since I do not believe in the impending closing of a wnner's window, I am also Ok with him being left at third.
  16. I'm a very fickle fan. I really don't care to watch many teams other than the ones I care about. I never really saw this kid play for any extended period of time. I have now. There is really nothing that I dislike about him. I hope that with his help we get to see some of the gaps in the rafters filled!
  17. Was Lambier the one Ainge bit?
  18. I've been sitting here with my son-in-law this morning talking about the nba in general (he gets it by the way). When the kids who never saw the "old guys" play like to say that they couldn't play in today's nba I just have to laugh. They really have no idea. Can you imagine Maravich in today's game? How many points might he have scored? Russell's 11 rings! This Celtics team is a throwback team for me. I'm saying it again too - Cousy is the only point guard that Irving reminds of. That is damned good company. We have our memories.
  19. He has a rifle for an arm. A big league third baseman's arm.
  20. I'm beginning to think that I might be old.
  21. Mel counts Actually just kidding - Baynes is possibly one of the more under rated big men of this era. I still can't think of even a banged up Walton being anybody's backup. God was he good.
  22. Look what I got going thee by simply mentioning Dever's footwork. I done good - lol!
  23. Win is a win. 10 - 2 with a banged up lineup. Walton when healthy was one of the best who ever played the game. Baynes is a little more like Wayne Embry. Remember him?
  24. You are assuming something that might just not happen. His thick lower half has nothing to do with his possibly growing out of the position. Gaining weight as we age does not need to happen. For the record - not sure I'm buying anything that you are selling. If he is lazy and gets fat, you might be right. It is more than simply footwork though - it is also about fitness.
  25. If Devers new instructors can't figure out that it is a footwork issue then they suck. He has the glove and the arm to be solid in that position. Since I don't subscribe to the cliff theory at all, I see 0 sense of urgency with respect to this kid playing third for us going forward. I wonder if the analytical geniouses have a way to measure the productivity of just his footwork?
×
×
  • Create New...