Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Nonetheless, offensive is not warranted, in my opinion. He was merely stating that you treat ZIPS as an authoritative source.
  2. moon's usage is perfectly consistent with some of the examples given here. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/gospel
  3. What? When did "gospel" the way moon used it become offensive? It's a common usage per any dictionary.
  4. And another pretty good player in Lynn.
  5. Although the A's won in 1972 without Reggie. Plus we were ahead 3-0 in Game 7 in 1975.
  6. Yeah, I'd have to say the 2004 team is the most special of the special. Not only breaking the drought, but beating the Yankees in miraculous fashion. And just an amazing group of players.
  7. And his nickname might been "Sir"...
  8. Indeed. Good times ahead!
  9. Plus his heroics in the 1978 playoff game (sigh).
  10. Amazing how many of those names are blotted out of my memory.
  11. Not yet we can't.
  12. If Dalbec had done something with those 12 PA's, you might have a point...
  13. True, but I think the sub-text was that Haywood Sullivan was willing to let Fisk go so his son could play more? I might have that wrong, but I'm too lazy to look up.
  14. True. To narrow it down a bit, going into 2021 there was a lot of head-scratching and skepticism about acquisitions like Kike, Pivetta and Renfroe, but they outperformed expectations and helped the team get as far as they did.
  15. Sure. But on the flip side, the 2021 team was expected to be about a .500 team or a little better, and they came close to the World Series. So maybe we should accept that Bloom has a clue what he's doing.
  16. Duran is an X factor, and it makes sense for them not to count on him, but at the same time to give him a chance. Or, as others have suggested, they might trade him.
  17. For the second year in a row, Bloom is befuddling us with his outfield construction...
  18. Yes, Barnes probably read your comments and was deeply affected by them.
  19. https://www.talksox.com/forum/threads/20141-Barnes-extended?p=1401960&viewfull=1#post1401960 "Some overvalue Barnes' small-sample 37-inning turnaround from his forgettable 2020 season." If "forgettable" isn't a negative opinion, I'm not sure what is.
  20. Stats are being provided here too. And readers are free to reach their own conclusions. So where's the issue? In the Barnes extension thread you made it a point to correct anyone who called it "highway robbery". You rendered your opinion. You do stoop to providing opinions sometimes.
  21. Well, maybe you should think about that the next time you tell us that we're over-valuing a Red Sox player or prospect, which you often do. In that case you're the one who's saying "they're not that good". And who knows if a relative of that player isn't reading? Sometimes your moral high ground gets a little too high.
  22. It's strictly for amusement, though. We're not hurting anyone. Not like the players are ever going to know.
  23. Next up: Worst Red Sox Scumbags of All Time.
  24. Franchy Cordero has also put himself in the conversation-small sample, but impressively bad.
×
×
  • Create New...